The Double Predestination Of Non-Calvinists!

TomFL

Well-known member
Rom 9 teaches double predestination and unconditional election and reprobation. I'm here to testify to it!
Sorry double predestination and unconditionbal election are not even mentioned

This is a simple case of you reading your theology into a passage

and your theology gets contradicted in Chapter11 of the same book
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
Sorry double predestination and unconditionbal election are not even mentioned

This is a simple case of you reading your theology into a passage

and your theology gets contradicted in Chapter11 of the same book
Yes they are mentioned, very clearly may i add
 

TomFL

Well-known member
Yes they are mentioned, very clearly may i add
Then point it out

Sorry double predestination and unconditional election to salvation are not even mentioned

This is a simple case of you reading your theology into a passage

and your theology gets contradicted in Chapter11 of the same book
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
Then point it out

Sorry double predestination and unconditional election to salvation are not even mentioned

This is a simple case of you reading your theology into a passage

and your theology gets contradicted in Chapter11 of the same book
I already have. The parts of Rom 9 about the twins, thats unconditional election and reprobation and when about the potter, thats double predestination !
 

TomFL

Well-known member
I already have. The parts of Rom 9 about the twins, thats unconditional election and reprobation and when about the potter, thats double predestination !
No you have not

you simply asserted it

Then point it out

Sorry double predestination and unconditional election to salvation are not even mentioned

This is a simple case of you reading your theology into a passage

and your theology gets contradicted in Chapter11 of the same book
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
No you have not

you simply asserted it

Then point it out

Sorry double predestination and unconditional election to salvation are not even mentioned

This is a simple case of you reading your theology into a passage

and your theology gets contradicted in Chapter11 of the same book
Yes I have
 
Top