The Election Conspiracy

vibise

Well-known member
No one can debunk what I've seen with my own eyes. If I see you shoot someone, others can debunk it all they want, it doesn't change what I saw.

I don't know what was on those ballots but I know they ejected oversight and then started processing ballots after they left. That's a problem. It needs to be investigated.
If you saw something problematic with your own eyes, you should report it and ask to be a witness. Make public the specifics. Where, when, who, how? Name names.

Did you actually see something as a poll watcher, or are you just parroting things you heard from RW sources?
 

vibise

Well-known member
The things which I said weren't a myth are supported by facts. I listed them.

They've laid it out for the public. MSM blocks the evidence and slants the news as a propaganda machine for never-********. I spent an entire episode on CNN and saw what they were doing. I know better because I did my own checking. I didn't vote for Trump in 2016, but Biden Kamala is a horror story that will never end, but you all don't care.

Sorry, I got carried away. The courts won't hear the evidence. That's a problem.

Yep. Dismissed without viewing the evidence. They are either influenced by MSM or have political affiliation with the Democratic party even if they claim they are republican. You know what a RINO is, don't you? It's not a new beast. They've been around for a long time.
None of your referenced and so-called facts have been submitted in court, where there are serious consequences for lying.

Who laid it out for the public? RW media?

You actually watched a whole "episode" on CNN and decided their reporting was false because....???? I note you provided no details of the alleged false reporting.

You claim that courts won't hear the evidence, but what about the Trump or GOP appointed judges - are they in on some leftie conspiracy?

Bottom line - if you have the evidence, produce it. Details are critical, as is logic and attention to law.

Just because your team lost, does not mean the game was rigged.

So far, after about 50 court cases, Trump's lawyers can't do this, so clearly they got nothing...
 

brotherofJared

Well-known member
If you saw something problematic with your own eyes, you should report it and ask to be a witness.
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
What makes you think I haven't. Does it make any difference? If a judge won't hear it, I might as well as not have seen anything. That's my point. You all are being duped. There are hundreds of witnesses. We're all in the same boat. We're stuck in the boat being cast off of the good ship The United States Presidential Coup.
Where, when, who, how? Name names.
I'm a witness, not an investigator. I didn't take a roll call of the criminals involved. I know where and when, but I can't find out how until an investigation takes place.

Get me in front of a judge with Gulliani and my witness who will hear my case and we'll go from there. So far, that hasn't happened.
Did you actually see something as a poll watcher, or are you just parroting things you heard from RW sources?
LOL. Now you're the investigator. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
What makes you think I haven't. Does it make any difference? If a judge won't hear it, I might as well as not have seen anything. That's my point. You all are being duped. There are hundreds of witnesses. We're all in the same boat. We're stuck in the boat being cast off of the good ship The United States Presidential Coup.

I'm a witness, not an investigator. I didn't take a roll call of the criminals involved. I know where and when, but I can't find out how until an investigation takes place.

Get me in front of a judge with Gulliani and my witness who will hear my case and we'll go from there. So far, that hasn't happened.

LOL. Now you're the investigator. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Then tell us where and when. Tell us exactly what you saw.
 

brotherofJared

Well-known member
None of your referenced and so-called facts have been submitted in court, where there are serious consequences for lying.
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
This is so dumb. It's like trying to catch greased pigs. You tell me that no evidence has been submitted when there has been, refusing to see the evidence is not the same as it wasn't submitted. And then you warn me that there are serious consequences for lying. Like, why would you tell me that. Am I lying? Do you have any evidence that I'm lying? No. You don't. But you do have evidence that all these "myths" did actually take place. Why aren't these being heard in court? It's not because there is no evidence being submitted, that's for sure.
 

DeSanto

Super Member
If you saw something problematic with your own eyes, you should report it and ask to be a witness. Make public the specifics. Where, when, who, how? Name names.

Did you actually see something as a poll watcher, or are you just parroting things you heard from RW sources?
You act as if it would make some sort of difference if he was a poll watcher that reported an incident and testified in court under oath live on public television. 🤔
 
Last edited:

brotherofJared

Well-known member
You actually watched a whole "episode" on CNN and decided their reporting was false because....????
The slant. I can tell propaganda when I see it. Like your quips to push me to become a "witness". You have nothing that would forward my position with any judge. It's just a ploy to drag out information show you can make fun of it. But, I've asked for the purported debunking of one video that I saw. So, let's see it.

I'm guessing I'll never see the 50 courts and their judges' affiliation...
 

brotherofJared

Well-known member
You act as if it would make some sort of difference if he was a poll watcher that reported an incident and testified in court under oath live on public television. 🤔
I know, right? It's ridiculous. They accept their LW media and reject anything that opposes their view claiming anything that does as being debunked. Offer 50 courts with mostly Trump appointees... It's all smoke and mirrors.
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
I know, right? It's ridiculous. They accept their LW media and reject anything that opposes their view claiming anything that does as being debunked. Offer 50 courts with mostly Trump appointees... It's all smoke and mirrors.
Why is the fact that over 50 courts (many with Republican appointed judges, some with Trump appointed judges) rejected the suits "smoke and mirrors"?
 

Carol

Well-known member
If it is not a myth, then it should be supported by facts.
So, if your arguments are true, then why haven't Trump's lawyers laid out the actual evidence for the courts and the public?
So far they have not. Which means that when push comes to shove, they have nothing.

Their court cases have been dismissed quickly, and sometimes with harsh words from the judges. In at least one case, these decisions came from a judge appointed by Trump, and in other cases from other Republican appointed judges.

There is no there there. To quote Gertrude Stein.

Give it up.

Game over.

It isn't yet over here in Michigan. SS Benson may be getting a subpoena from the legislature.
We'll see what happens tomorrow.....
 

DeSanto

Super Member
Why is the fact that over 50 courts (many with Republican appointed judges, some with Trump appointed judges) rejected the suits "smoke and mirrors"?
This just in...

(self-censored version)

Start connecting dots my friend. . . .

The swamp runs deep.
 

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
This just in...

(self-censored version)

Start connecting dots my friend. . . .
There's nothing to connect. No evidence that this has any relationship at all to the election.
The swamp runs deep.
And right in the middle is Trump, still trying to steal the election.
 

vibise

Well-known member
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
This is so dumb. It's like trying to catch greased pigs. You tell me that no evidence has been submitted when there has been, refusing to see the evidence is not the same as it wasn't submitted. And then you warn me that there are serious consequences for lying. Like, why would you tell me that. Am I lying? Do you have any evidence that I'm lying? No. You don't. But you do have evidence that all these "myths" did actually take place. Why aren't these being heard in court? It's not because there is no evidence being submitted, that's for sure.
Trump supporters and lawyers can say what they want on RW websites.
But they can't make false statements in court.

So they tell lies to their supporters, and are careful to tell judges they have no evidence of fraud.

If you want to make your case, you have to lay out the evidence, with names and dates and videos or paper records. So far, none of that has been brought forth.

We get it that you don't like the result of this election, but if you seriously expect to overturn it, you have to have serious evidence.
 

DeSanto

Super Member
There's nothing to connect. No evidence that this has any relationship at all to the election.
And right in the middle is Trump, still trying to steal the election.
I don’t believe you’re that obtuse. I’m beginning to wonder if you are not compromised by China too.
 
Last edited:
Top