inertia
Super Member
Can "we" continually discover new knowledge or is there a limit? Was the use of scientific methodology only a temporary phase in human history?
John Horgan poses a similar question:
"Will our theories of the cosmos seem as wrong to our descendants as Aristotle's theories seem to us?"
Jim Peebles (astrophysicist) believes that there is "no end, and no cause for concern about the end of research", and this sentiment ostensibly feels valid due to our requirements for ever higher precision measurements and refinements in establishing higher standards in accuracy. Reducing uncertainty is exceedingly important and this requirement isn't going away anytime soon. Mathematically ignoring details when modeling at large scales does make solutions easier to come by, yet room for improvement is a continuous a gap away from a better grasp at understanding.
Sabine explains further: ( timestamp 4:50 - 10:02 )
___
.
John Horgan poses a similar question:
"Will our theories of the cosmos seem as wrong to our descendants as Aristotle's theories seem to us?"
Jim Peebles (astrophysicist) believes that there is "no end, and no cause for concern about the end of research", and this sentiment ostensibly feels valid due to our requirements for ever higher precision measurements and refinements in establishing higher standards in accuracy. Reducing uncertainty is exceedingly important and this requirement isn't going away anytime soon. Mathematically ignoring details when modeling at large scales does make solutions easier to come by, yet room for improvement is a continuous a gap away from a better grasp at understanding.
Sabine explains further: ( timestamp 4:50 - 10:02 )
___
.
Last edited: