If it was so easy, why did Simonides demand $10,000 (pounds? dollars? = going by memory here) to show a live demonstration of him (supposedly) easily writing the exact script of the Sinaiticus at normal handwriting speed before an audience?
I wonder which part of the manuscript he was planning on demonstrating, since there were undeniably multiple scribal hands and correctors that worked on Sinaiticus.
Jongkind, Milne & Skeat, Myshrall, Lake, Parker, Paulson, and numerous others have all done detailed analyses of the various writing peculiarities from scribe to scribe and corrector to corrector.
Different quirks in how individual Greek letters were written.
Different corinis (signatures) at the end of the books.
Different notation styles.
Different ways of adding omitted portions of a verse.
Different ways the text was corrected.
The colophons at the end of Ezra and Esther.
........All of which is impossible if Sinaiticus is a 19th century production that Simonides wrote himself, like he claimed, as a gift for the Czar.
Avery won't touch this aspect of the history of Sinaiticus for obvious reasons.
He'll waste page upon page writing about the coloring nonsense, while conveniently saying nothing about the color of Fuldensis (it's white)
...but that's all he's got.
1) the lies of Simonides
2) his manuscript color straw man
The professionals who have seen it, handled it, and can read it are "dupes."
The near octogenarian who has never seen it, has never handled it, and who can't read it is on the cutting edge of truth with his self proclaimed "research team."
And up is down.
Left is right.
KJVOs are scholars.