Same thing ....I pointed the 'and' out to you in my first post... see the blue underscored vav. If you don't recognize that as 'and' then all you've demonstrated is you lack even a rudimentary knowledge of Hebrew. Further conversation is pointless...
All you said in your first response was the text had an AND.
Which it does ......
However, you never said the AND was between good and evil.
Now then, we have been round and round on this.
And you STILL have not shown the AND between good evil; the name of the tree was good evil.
It's the same thing ......
Then the good evil shows ...... good and evil for their prioria.
IT IS STILL THE TREE OF GOOD EVIL.