Noah's flood was 65 myo? Better let Ken Ham know. On the other hand, if the flood was about 4,500 years ago then why don't we find a lot more undigested muscle tissue, as we do with Siberian mammoths? Your inconsistencies are showing here.
Of course! The only flood that ever occurred was Noah's flood. You might as well argue that every sunrise is consistent with a dung beetle rolling the sun across the heavens.
The information in DNA is the same problem as the OOL problem. Information in the environment is not the solution. You don't have an environment with trees and meadows and singing birds but rather solidified molten lava eroded into dust much like the moon or mars.
PRATT, The God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob has always existed is Spirit and does not require a designer.
Molten lava and dust do not contain DNA, so there is no issue: zero DNA, zero information; zero problem. Any environment contains information. Even a single pebble contains information.
Then there is a complex intelligence that was not designed. Hence the ID claim that specified complexity requires design is falsified. The Abrahamic God is a counter-example which the great majority of ID proponents will support. ID is self-refuting.
So you believe it is more reasonable to deduce the undigested muscle tissue in the poop of a T-Rex is better explained by 65 (actually 80-90 million yrs to be more exact) myo date than an earlier date of around 4 to 5 thousand years. That is all anyone needs to know. I would be interested in your case for a far later date seeing as how none of this was predicted before the fact and your preposterous conclusion is a science-free post hoc. If it all is so obvious then why was it not all addressed before the fact? Falsifying evidence against your dating, which is off by millions of years, Mr science guy
) is simply ignored, bounces off your head, (no surprise there) and the actual data is simply absorbed into the millions of years model.
None of this is worth the bother. Go away until you come up with something more compelling than schoolboy sarcasm as a sub for brain power.
You seem to have forgotten your initial goal of showing that the information in DNA/RNA resulted from the environment which your now claim is zero information.
I like how you guys take an ID claim and then reform it to fit your criteria and then tear it down. If your pet theory were really legit there would be not need for such child-like tactics. The claim is that the specified complexity in life is best explained by intelligence rather than non-directed naturalism or materialism. There is no mention of the identity of the designer. But assuming it were the Abrahamic God who is spirit. Does spirit follow the same laws of complexity as matter? You are making assumptions on things you know nothing about.
And you still have not shown why ID has to jump thru your hoops while everyone else gets off scott free.
There is no evidence of any living T. rex later than 65 myo. If you can find such evidence, as was done with coelacanths, then I will change my mind. Absent any such evidence then I will stick with the given dates.
Well show us how a millions year old late date better fits the facts than an earlier date of thousands of years for undigested muscle tissue discovered in T-Rex poop. You can't. You punked out. What a joke. Mr science guy. it is two models in contention for age. Multiple millions or thousands. Now make your case since you opted for the later date and the greater the claim, the more the burden of proof.
Not all of them. Various pairs within 'dinosaur kind', at least one pair and possibly more depending on how many baramins there were within the overall dinosaur clade. Those dinosaurs survived the flood on the Ark. Where are their footprints in the mud left by the flood? Where are their bones? Either all dinosaurs were already extinct before the flood, or some survived on the Ark. Either way you are wrong here.
The environment you described was too hot for DNA, so there was no DNA, or RNA, in that environment. There was, however, information.
There is a mechanism: random mutation and natural selection. RM provides a menu of information options. NS picks the options that better match the information in the environment. If you like, the information in DNA is specified by the environment the organism lives in. Marine organisms need to extract oxygen from water; land organisms need to extract oxygen from air. The environment specifies the requirement.
Would you take an untested vaccine? I would not accept an untested design detector. A lot of science is tested and retested. ID needs to learn to do that if it wants to be science and to be taught in science classes.
Show me a universal recent genetic bottleneck in all land tetrapod species. I will give you cheetahs for free. You have to show me the rest.
Paleontologists have also uncovered: (1) quinones from sea lily fossils that date to 350 million years in age; (2) ink within the ink sacs of fossilized cuttlefish, dating to 160 million years in age; (3) chitin from 34-million-year-old cuttlefish and 505-million-year-old sponges; and (4) shell proteins from 15 million-year-old mollusk fossils.
I knew you would punk out.
I knew you would not be able to show me evidence of a recent universal genetic bottleneck as is required by a literal worldwide flood. It is you and every other YEC creationist who is punking out.
You asked to dodge. When push comes to shove you resort to schoolboy. You got nothing. Science is not your friend since it does not support your delusions. You might as well believe in fairies.
You picked the environment not me. If it's too hot to handle then stay out.
What a croc. You need DNA before you can have RMNS or did you again forget your initial goal. That DNA has an explanation.
Avoiding that issue that you make up requirements for ID (jump thru hoops) but accept them with out question everywhere else. Your depth for deception continues to follow you.
Early life needed some form of information storage. It might have been DNA, it might have been RNA, it might have been proteins or it might have been something else. What we see today has been evolving for billions of years; it is not the same as the first life.
I gave you a reference to a scientific paper above. Science has already jumped through the hoops. Unless ID jumps through the same hoops then it is not science and is, rightly, excluded from science classrooms.
IOW, you have no explanation for DNA/RNA and RMNS is not the solution its existence. Why not simply start with that?
What you gave was a sciencey sounding reference with the claim that science has jumped through the hoops, without actually jumping through the hoops. How about archeological artifacts, the Rosetta stone, Stone Hedge. All of which are taken at face value without the need to show that their design detection is valid and specified complexity is all that suffices.
