Carbon
Super Member
Yep. If he could only see itNothing but worthless and empty denial by you.
You remain refuted.
Yep. If he could only see itNothing but worthless and empty denial by you.
You remain refuted.
I see thatHe doesn't care what Calvin was talking about.
He's only interested in finding texts he can twist to support his false teachings.
Since you have a difficult time seeing the truth of many other passages I expect you not to see the obvious truth here in Eph 2:8 as well.He didn't
salvation is not of yourself
You offer only your opinionSince you have a difficult time seeing the truth of many other passages I expect you not to see the obvious truth here in Eph 2:8 as well.
Says the one who tried to twist BDAG into saying what it did notHe doesn't care what Calvin was talking about.
He's only interested in finding texts he can twist to support his false teachings.
Do you have anything more than your opinion to offer ?You have no idea what Calvin is talking about.
Sorry but your imagination is getting the better of youYou offer nothing new, you're simply wasting everyone's time and wasting CARM resources by cutting-and-pasting the same garbage that I've already refuted.
you claim life lets us have faithRegeneration gives us Life, and Life lets us have Faith. Faith is the Gift of God because Life is the Gift of God...
As a non-Calvinist, you will want to talk about whether Calvinists believe Regeneration and Faith are two distinct Gifts of God. I'm sure some Calvinists will say they are indeed two different Gifts...
what you are ignoring is that the verb form of faith means "to entrust yourself to"Faith is always by forced consent.
It’s a serious error to believe that faith can ever be an arbitrary act of the will. That a man can ever believe or disbelieve because he chooses to.
How does that make any sense to you?
Faith is always the involuntary response of the mind to the evidence which has been presented to it.
Isn’t faith always grounded on what the mind considers sufficient evidence?
Augustine said,
We know what rests on reason; we believe what’s rests on authority,
you claim life lets us have faith
What is your scripture?
No one says it's "forced". Only the ignorantwhat you are ignoring is that the verb form of faith means "to entrust yourself to"
How can that be forced? What scripture or logic teaches that we can be forced to entrust ourselves to jesus?
Colossians 2:12,13 is referring to regeneration? Show us.Sorry but your imagination is getting the better of you
You have to do more that say no its not to refute anything Theo
This one verse alone refutes you
Colossians 2:12-13 (KJV)
12 Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.
13 And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
Our spiritual resurrection with Christ is through faith in the operation of God
That speaks of regeneration
further having had your sins forgiven (verse 13) precedes being quickened (regenerated)
and of course scripture is clear faith precedes remission
Additional however as was noted regeneration imparts life that is eternal
There is no such thing as regenerative life which is not eternal
You attempt to bifurcate life and eternal life but the bible uses them interchangeably
1 John 5:11-12 (KJV)
11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
12 He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
No Theo you have not refuted anything and you yourself are refuted
Define regenerationColossians 2:12,13 is referring to regeneration? Show us.
Also then you believe in baptismal regeneration??
That is calvinist double talk. As a Calvinist you will talk about how the person had no voluntary participation in receiving the Spirit, that it was done completely outside of their will, You describe a forced event yet do not want it to be called what it is?No one says it's "forced". Only the ignorant
If you can get a Cavinist to define anything, that would be a success. My experience here is that they do not want to be held down to any specific definition for crucial terms because they would then be pinned down to an actual position to defend, Keep it vague, keep it changing, Deny everything that gets too specific.Define regeneration
3824 παλιγγενεσία, παλινγενεσία [paliggenesia /pal·ing·ghen·es·ee·ah/] n f. From 3825 and 1078; TDNT 1:686; TDNTA 117; GK 4098 and 4100; Two occurrences; AV translates as “regeneration” twice. 1 new birth, reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration. 1A hence renovation, regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God
REGENERATING (Titus 3:5)
Although the word regeneration is used only twice in the Bible (Titus 3:5, where it refers to the new birth, and Mt 19:28 where it refers to the millennial kingdom), the concept of being born again is found in other passages, notably John 3. Technically, it is God’s act of begetting eternal life in the one who believes in Christ.
Charles Caldwell Ryrie, A Survey of Bible Doctrine (Chicago: Moody Press, 1972).
Regeneration may be defined as the communication of divine life to the soul … as the impartation of a new nature … or heart … and the production of a new creation.38
Succinctly stated, to regenerate means “to impart life.” Regeneration is the act whereby God imparts life to the one who believes.
Moody handbook of theology
Baptismal regeneration ?
I do not make the mistake of believing every mention of the word baptism refers to water
Matthew 3:11 (KJV)
11 I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire:
1 Corinthians 12:13 (KJV)
13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.
Scripture is clear the Spirit is received through faithThat is calvinist double talk. As a Calvinist you will talk about how the person had no voluntary participation in receiving the Spirit, that it was done completely outside of their will, You describe a forced event yet do not want it to be called what it is?
The opposite of forced is voluntary. When you deny force, then you are allowing voluntary participation.
But you deny voluntary participation.
Which is it?
That is calvinist double talk.
As a Calvinist you will talk about how the person had no voluntary participation in receiving the Spirit, that it was done completely outside of their will, You describe a forced event yet do not want it to be called what it is?
The opposite of forced is voluntary.
When you deny force, then you are allowing voluntary participation.
If you can get a Cavinist to define anything, that would be a success. My experience here is that they do not want to be held down to any specific definition for crucial terms because they would then be pinned down to an actual position to defend, Keep it vague, keep it changing, Deny everything that gets too specific.
Two phrases in thaht passage. "raised you up" and 'made you alive" both speak to the new life that was received by faith.Colossians 2:12,13 is referring to regeneration? Show us.
Also then you believe in baptismal regeneration??