stiggy wiggy
Well-known member
After I made the comment that omnipresence doesn't mean being in places that don't exist, he said:
"Omnipresence is the state of being everywhere at the same time
EVERYWHERE means EVERYWHERE - existent or not"
When I challenged this by telling him for example that I don't believe God exists in a Taco Bell on Jupiter, he told me that I worship a weak and limited God.
I was tempted to say I now don't believe He exists in his brain, but I resisted, because his brain must exist to allow the motor skills to even type such foolishness.
Any atheists here agree with the doctrine of this very silly theistic atheist?
"Omnipresence is the state of being everywhere at the same time
EVERYWHERE means EVERYWHERE - existent or not"
When I challenged this by telling him for example that I don't believe God exists in a Taco Bell on Jupiter, he told me that I worship a weak and limited God.
I was tempted to say I now don't believe He exists in his brain, but I resisted, because his brain must exist to allow the motor skills to even type such foolishness.
Any atheists here agree with the doctrine of this very silly theistic atheist?