The Loathsome Right and Girl Scouts

Electric Skeptic

Well-known member
In 2011 the Girls Scouts of America came out with a statement that they would welcome transgender children and adolescents who identified as girls into their organisation, saying (in part):

"...if the child is recognized by the family and school/community as a girl and lives culturally as a girl, then Girl Scouts is an organization that can serve her in a setting that is both emotionally and physically safe."

In response, of course, the whiny right claimed that the Girl Scouts had "lost its moral compass" and created a petition to get them to rescind their policy. The petition said, in part:

“This means girls in the organization will be forced to recognize and accept transgenderism as a normal lifestyle. Boys in skirts, boys in make-up and boys in tents will become a part of the program. This change will put young innocent girls at risk.”

They also organised a Girl Scout Cookie boycott which, of course, went absolutely nowhere.

Ten years later, I'd like to ask - where are the 'young innocent girls' who have suffered from this policy? Where is the harm that has come from it? Or was the right's fearmongering prompted by nothing more than their usual hatred of anything remotely liberal?
 

BMS

Well-known member
In 2011 the Girls Scouts of America came out with a statement that they would welcome transgender children and adolescents who identified as girls into their organisation, saying (in part):

"...if the child is recognized by the family and school/community as a girl and lives culturally as a girl, then Girl Scouts is an organization that can serve her in a setting that is both emotionally and physically safe."

In response, of course, the whiny right claimed that the Girl Scouts had "lost its moral compass" and created a petition to get them to rescind their policy. The petition said, in part:

“This means girls in the organization will be forced to recognize and accept transgenderism as a normal lifestyle. Boys in skirts, boys in make-up and boys in tents will become a part of the program. This change will put young innocent girls at risk.”

They also organised a Girl Scout Cookie boycott which, of course, went absolutely nowhere.

Ten years later, I'd like to ask - where are the 'young innocent girls' who have suffered from this policy? Where is the harm that has come from it? Or was the right's fearmongering prompted by nothing more than their usual hatred of anything remotely liberal?
They can be seen everywhere, and the expression of the hatred in woke ideology.
Since you cant see problem with girl scouts having boys under the deception of trans you wint realise it is all grooming and child abuse.
And one cant get much more depraved than child abuse and pro-choice abortion.
 

Temujin

Well-known member
They can be seen everywhere, and the expression of the hatred in woke ideology.
Since you cant see problem with girl scouts having boys under the deception of trans you wint realise it is all grooming and child abuse.
And one cant get much more depraved than child abuse and pro-choice abortion.
So, no evidence of any harm whatsoever. No cases of abuse. No assaults. No problems. Just you having a hissy fit.
 

BMS

Well-known member
LOL, if he was blind to reality then you should be able to provide evidence of harm, examples of abuse, etc.

The only one getting all upset appears to be you.
the evidence has been presented. Why do say otherwise??
Here is some more.

Gays and lesbians feeling they are getting groomed and abused, as the evidence shows, and you laugh. Shameful
Women feel like they are getting denied and abused, as the evidence shows, and you laugh. Shameful.

Everyone should be getting upset about it
 

Mike McK

Well-known member
In 2011 the Girls Scouts of America came out with a statement that they would welcome transgender children and adolescents who identified as girls into their organisation, saying (in part):

"...if the child is recognized by the family and school/community as a girl and lives culturally as a girl, then Girl Scouts is an organization that can serve her in a setting that is both emotionally and physically safe."

In response, of course, the whiny right claimed that the Girl Scouts had "lost its moral compass" and created a petition to get them to rescind their policy. The petition said, in part:

“This means girls in the organization will be forced to recognize and accept transgenderism as a normal lifestyle. Boys in skirts, boys in make-up and boys in tents will become a part of the program. This change will put young innocent girls at risk.”

They also organised a Girl Scout Cookie boycott which, of course, went absolutely nowhere.

Ten years later, I'd like to ask - where are the 'young innocent girls' who have suffered from this policy? Where is the harm that has come from it? Or was the right's fearmongering prompted by nothing more than their usual hatred of anything remotely liberal?
Leave to the moronic Left to not know the difference between a boy and a girl.

The Left is a bunch of child abusing freaks.
 

Mike McK

Well-known member
Gays and lesbians feeling they are getting groomed and abused, as the evidence shows, and you laugh. Shameful
Women feel like they are getting denied and abused, as the evidence shows, and you laugh. Shameful.
Of course, he laughs. Who do you think is doing the grooming? A child confused about his sexuality is easy picking for Democrats.
 

BMS

Well-known member
No. Grooming is when you brainwash a child to trust and obey the preacher.
The girl scouts dont have preachers mate.
And the evidence has been given so your opinion is worthless unless it comes with some evidence and reasoning.
 

Mr Laurier

Well-known member
By indulging their sexual confusion?
No. By teaching them that no adult has any right to touch them. And teaching that that its ok to come forward and tell someone.
All you're doing is preparing them for your perversion.
What "perversion"? What "perversion" am I preparing them for by teaching them that no adult has any right to touch them, and that its ok to come forward and tell someone if an adult does touch them inappropriately?
What "perversion" am I preparing them for by teaching them to punch any boy who tries to touch their bum?
Please do tell?
 

Mr Laurier

Well-known member
Yep. Brainwashing someone is grooming, too, and it's just as wrong as you teaching children to be sexually confused so you can molest them.
Yes. Teaching a child that they are just "confused" does seem to make it easier for predators to molest kids. Which is why we are trying to counter that practice by helping children see that they are NOT confused.

And why would I want to molest them?
 

TeabagSalad

Active member
the evidence has been presented. Why do say otherwise??
Here is some more.

Gays and lesbians feeling they are getting groomed and abused, as the evidence shows, and you laugh. Shameful
Women feel like they are getting denied and abused, as the evidence shows, and you laugh. Shameful.

Everyone should be getting upset about it

lol...the LGB Alliance. A "charity" known for being Anti-Trans (and specifically formed to be such). It also turns out that they are associated with neo-Nazi groups and other homophobic groups in the USA.
 

BMS

Well-known member
lol...the LGB Alliance. A "charity" known for being Anti-Trans (and specifically formed to be such).
LOL Every charity should be anti-trans since its mentally deficient ideology. It is anti-women and anti-transsexuals, anti gays and lesbians and anti-reality.

It also turns out that they are associated with neo-Nazi groups and other homophobic groups in the USA.
Ypu will need to provide some evidence for that piece of imagination. lol
 
Top