Mr Laurier
Well-known member
huh?Then change the color of your shirt and sailor cap.
Your total non-sequitur depends on my owning a sailor cap.
And you should try to be a little less dishonest in quotemining me.
And the letter "U" is a thing
huh?Then change the color of your shirt and sailor cap.
No, they're not - or, to precisely the same extent, festivals/events/objects/etc created in reference to other deities would be evidence of their existence. Is the fact that the days of the week and months of the year are named for ancient gods evidence of their existence?Actually, they are.
Again, that is not the case. The bible could have been written, and all of the above lines included, whether God exists or not.Matthew 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
James 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Notice the progression.
If God didn't exist, there would be none of these things mentioned.
A worthless opinion given that you don't know what evidence is and refuse to learn.Actually, they are.
False and completely unsupported.If God didn't exist, there would be none of these things mentioned.
How could you possibly show that this assertion is true? Seriously: look at it from an analytical point of view. How could one demonstrate that, given no God, no such things could possibly have happened?Actually, they are.
Matthew 7:20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
James 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
Romans 10:17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Notice the progression.
If God didn't exist, there would be none of these things mentioned.
This was done by man and is in no way proof of god.Here's objective evidence of God:
1. Time divided into BC and AD.
These are human organizations that help people - there is no evidence that God is involved.2. Organizations such as the Red Cross and Salvation Army.
They use science.3. Hospitals built by Christian organizations.
I like Hindu and Muslim artwork - it does not prove Allah is real.4. Beautiful Christian artwork, edifices, statuary and literature.
Put there by men, not god.5. IN GOD WE TRUST on our coins and UNDER GOD in our pledge of allegiance.
Quotes from the Koran are displayed in public all over the world.6. The Ten Commandments and other literature displayed in public.
Ramadan and Diwali.7. Christmas & Easter
Muslim bumper stickers and flags.8. Symbols on bumper stickers and flags.
Debates in the name of Islam.9. Public debates in the name of Christianity.
Erected by men - the same as shrines to Allah.10. Crosses and billboards erected to testify of Jesus Christ.
None of this is objective evidence for god in any way.If God didn't exist, neither would this evidence.
God uses man to do His will; He used a lying spirit to do His will; and in two instances that I know of, He let Satan do His will.This was done by man and is in no way proof of god.
And who says Jupiter, Zeus, Odin, or Osiris didn't exist back then?You listed a bunch of human created things that are dedicated to a god - no different than the human dedicated things to Jupiter, Zeus, Odin, or Osiris.
The existence of these specular things does not prove God as you claimed. Can you prove that God used man?God uses man to do His will; He used a lying spirit to do His will; and in two instances that I know of, He let Satan do His will.
I see no reason to believe they did. Do you believe they did? How did you prove that?And who says Jupiter, Zeus, Odin, or Osiris didn't exist back then?
I think we're going in circles here.The existence of these specular things does not prove God as you claimed. Can you prove that God used man?
Yes, I believe they did; and the burden of proof is not on me, because I don't go by science.Lighthearted Atheist said:I see no reason to believe they did. Do you believe they did? How did you prove that?
A competent God would do His things Himself.God uses man to do His will
Everything?A competent God would do His things Himself.
I can't say.Everything?
God certainly works in mysterious ways, doesn't He?I can't say.
What I can say, though, is that Christians believe God created (ultimately) flawed beings who were then condemned to Hell for being imperfect. For God to then use these beings to "do His will" is ridiculous; a competent creator would use the best tools available, and humans definitely are not one of them.
ps. and really, a creator God would have no need of tools...
Not really. I asked if you had any proof of your beliefs and you have none. Fairly linier.I think we're going in circles here.
If you do not use science then how do you know what is real and what is not?Yes, I believe they did; and the burden of proof is not on me, because I don't go by science.
Faith.If you do not use science then how do you know what is real and what is not?
No. That He's incompetent is no mystery.God certainly works in mysterious ways, doesn't He?
I start the car. If it starts its gas. If not then it was something else and I need to gather evidence to figure out what the liquid was. Not faith at all.How do I know it's gas I'm putting in my car at the gas pump?
There are 10,000 gods and you have chosen one to be real. So your chance is 1 in 10,000. Might have better luck with the lotteryI'm willing to take that chance.
I see no reason to believe that quote is from a god - but I am glad it makes you happy.The outcome is as follows:
2 Timothy 1:12 For the which cause I also suffer these things: nevertheless I am not ashamed: for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day.
The burden of proof is on you I'm afraid because you made the claim.I think we're going in circles here. Yes, I believe they did; and the burden of proof is not on me, because I don't go by science.
huh?
This was done by man and is in no way proof of god.
These are human organizations that help people - there is no evidence that God is involved.
They use science.
I like Hindu and Muslim artwork - it does not prove Allah is real.
Put there by men, not god.
Quotes from the Koran are displayed in public all over the world.
Ramadan and Diwali.
Muslim bumper stickers and flags.
Debates in the name of Islam.
Erected by men - the same as shrines to Allah.
None of this is objective evidence for god in any way.
This would be evidence for god:
- Manna from the sky we can test
- God appears and speaks to humanity
- Jesus rises from the dead while doctors and scientists examine him
You listed a bunch of human created things that are dedicated to a god - no different than the human dedicated things to Jupiter, Zeus, Odin, or Osiris.