No, not a strawman. And you didn't answer my question.
Are you suggesting that no-one thinks God is just religion?
Sure it does, as if the only way and place that the truth and reality can be known to exist is in and by a believing mind and the truth and reality always existed, because to suggest other wise self-refuting, then the truth and reality must have always existed in God's mind. If you have another way or place outside of God's and our mind that the truth and reality can be known to exist, then be so kind as to let me know? If not, then stop lying to yourself.That doesn't prove God to be reality.
I can argue for or against whatever I want silly. And if you agree with it don't respond, but if you disagree then your job is to rebut it.Why are you arguing for things no-one has ever denied?
Sure it does, as if belief is necessary in order to make the truth and reality known to you, then you must have a belief in reality before the truth and reality is made known to you. So, it really does matter.It doesn't matter whose belief it is. Belief alone is never sufficient for knowledge.
I did and if you disagree with its meaning then say so.I asked you to explain what you mean by 'hosting'. You've just used the word again without defining or explaining your use.
Yes. You are reificating and thus conflating knowledge which is an abstract object and a chair which is a concrete object and pretending that they are known and experienced by us in the same way. And FYI everything we know and experience in and about the truth and reality is the product of a believing mind, including your “chair”.You're talking about knowledge. I asked about existence: Can you prove that a believing mind is the only place in which reality can EXIST? Why can't reality instead EXIST outside of minds as a mind-independent physical universe of time and space?Do you understand the difference between act and object? For instance, the difference between a chair and knowledge of that chair? The latter is a capacity of mind (knowledge), but the former (the chair) is not.
How can you know about existence without knowledge silly? As existence is a form of knowledge, because how are you able to know anything about existence without any knowledge of something's existence silly?You're talking about knowledge. I asked about existence: Can you prove that a believing mind is the only place in which reality can EXIST? Why can't reality instead EXIST outside of minds as a mind-independent physical universe of time and space?
Strawman. Sure I did.You still haven't explained what you mean by 'hosting' or why reality needs to be hosted in the first place.
Sure it does, because if in reality the ONLY way and place that the truth and reality can be known to exist is in and by a believing mind, and nothing can be known and experienced without a believing mind, then where else outside of a believing mind can the truth and reality be known to exist? And your inability to answer this question for yourself but your denial of its truthfulness is just suppression of the truth by your mere unbelief and nothing else.That doesn't explain why you think reality must exist in the same place that beliefs about it occur.
Willful suppression of the truth and reality's existence. Do you like wallow around in the delusion?If truth and reality have always existed then we don't need to account for their origin. And we don't need to locate them in the mind of God either.
How can you "think" without the benefit of a mind or know anything in or about a place that is independent of minds (MIPUST) silly?I don't think reality has an origin, and I think it exists as a mind-independent physical universe of space and time (MIPUST). Can you disprove this MIPUST hypothesis?