Theo1689
Well-known member
That verse does not apply to apologetics amongst believers. It applies to evangelism of the unbeliever who is resisting the Gospel. Its not about having to refute false teaching.
I see...
So you think discussion amongst believers should include being rude and insulting.
Sorry, I'm going to have to disagree.
Do you really need to know why I have hope? No, you do not...
Don't know, don't care.
Confronting false teaching is not simply a matter of confronting what is taught. Its also needing to endure the mentality that has an affinity for such false teaching. Its not pleasant for me to endure.
Oh, you poor baby...
Maybe if you tried a more positive attitude, you'd get a better response?
(Just a thought...)
If what you claim about Calvinism were true? You should be correcting and teaching us misinformed believers, if TULIP as we see it is not what Calvinists promote.
I disagree.
But there you go again, waving that big ugly chip on your shoulder around, trying to goad me into arguing with you.
Sorry, not interested.
I'm secure enough in my beliefs that I don't need your opinion to make me feel better.
I'm sorry that you are so insecure in your own beliefs.
Instead? You only can say I am entitled to my opinion. That leaves the other person hanging with nothing to think with, to even repent if need be.
Like I said, if you were sincerely interested (which clearly you are not), there are literally thousands of books you can read.
monergism.com
But you aren't interested in learning, you simply want to argue and insult.
And to that I simply say, "Sorry, not interested".
Now, what part of "no" don't you understand?
And, I thought it would be helpful to know if you are a naturally shy person. Its not an insult.
It's irrelevant red herring and ad hominem.