The only form of birth control that’s 100% effective is abstinence.

[Authentic Nouveau]

As the saying goes, the only form of birth control that’s 100% effective is abstinence. “Most of the time, birth control does work, but ‘accidents’ can happen,” Dolan says.

Siobhan Dolan, MD, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology and women’s health at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

WebMD

How many abortion apologists rail against abstinence?

Enraged pro-abortion activists refuse to cough up a single case of failed abstinence.

 

[Temujin]

WebMD

How many abortion apologists rail against abstinence?

Enraged pro-abortion activists refuse to cough up a single case of failed abstinence.

I would think that at some point in the sex life of every normal person there is at least one case of failed abstinence. They don't always lead to pregnancy of course. Any policy that relies on abstinence for birth control is doomed to failure. Sustained abstinence is abnormal.

 

[rossum]

WebMD

How many abortion apologists rail against abstinence?

Enraged pro-abortion activists refuse to cough up a single case of failed abstinence.

Abstinence does not prevent rape. So not 100% effective.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

WebMD

How many abortion apologists rail against abstinence?

Enraged pro-abortion activists refuse to cough up a single case of failed abstinence.

These apologists who rail against abstinence are facing an STD pandemic.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

How can the abortion chamber make money on abstinence?

 

[Electric Skeptic]

These apologists who rail against abstinence are facing an STD pandemic.

There are no apologists who rail against abstinence. Actually, there is nobody who rails against abstinence. Well, except in your imagination.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

Siobhan Dolan, MD, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology and women’s health at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

The local nut cases are not sources of medical facts.

 

[Yakuda]

Abstinence does not prevent rape. So not 100% effective.

All rapes lead to pregnancy? whats wrong with you?

 

[Temujin]

All rapes lead to pregnancy? whats wrong with you?

Of course they don't. But some do. Hence "not 100% effective."

 

[Yakuda]

Of course they don't. But some do. Hence "not 100% effective."

i was only saying that because im not sure what rape has to do with anything. You are right, the ONLY 100%efective way of avoding pregnancy is 100% abstinence. Period.

 

[Temujin]

i was only saying that because im not sure what rape has to do with anything. You are right, the ONLY 100%efective way of avoding pregnancy is 100% abstinence. Period.

And what is the 100%way of avoiding rape? Rape can cause pregnancy irrespective of how freakishly abstinent you are.

 

[rossum]

All rapes lead to pregnancy? whats wrong with you?

Some rapes lead to pregnancy. Hence abstinence is not 100% effective because some abstinent rape victims become pregnant.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

Abstinence does not prevent rape. So not 100% effective.

Twisted thinking. Why do you spit on medical science?
Only the uneducated think a attempted rapist without penetration can cause pregnancy. Your country needs science classes.

 

[Temujin]

Twisted thinking. Why do you spit on medical science?
Only the uneducated think a attempted rapist without penetration can cause pregnancy. Your country needs science classes.

Only the completely stupid would be taken in by your obvious non sequiturs. The only person fantasising about the mechanics of rape, is you. Rape by definition, requires penetration, though not necessarily by the penis. Not all rape results in pregnancy. Some do. The stupidity of your intervention would beggar belief if it was made by anyone else.

 

[Electric Skeptic]

Twisted thinking. Why do you spit on medical science?
Only the uneducated think a attempted rapist without penetration can cause pregnancy. Your country needs science classes.

That's not correct. It is possible - though unlikely - to become pregnant without penetration. Not to get too graphic, but ejaculate on the exterior of female reproductive parts can result in sperm making their way inside the vagina and meeting up with an egg.

 

[Authentic Nouveau]

Here is the problem. Pro-deathers launch into atheist word games. Quibling.

That's not correct. It is possible - though unlikely - to become pregnant without penetration. Not to get too graphic, but ejaculate on the exterior of female reproductive parts can result in sperm making their way inside the vagina and meeting up with an egg.

So that is not abstinence.

Do you want to bluff your way out of your bad science and attitudes?
Just a reminder, your false claims that the undelivered baby is a parasite is a sick and WRONG claim.

You are a medical outsider like the Wails jailer.

 

[Electric Skeptic]

Here is the problem. Pro-deathers launch into atheist word games. Quibling.

Since there are no pro-deathers, who cares?

So that is not abstinence.

Irrelevant to the issue. You were wrong; I corrected you.

Do you want to bluff your way out of your bad science and attitudes?

Bluff? What are you talking about?

Just a reminder, your false claims that the undelivered baby is a parasite is a sick and WRONG claim.

It is neither sick nor wrong.

You are a medical outsider like the Wails jailer.

Personal comment; irrelevant.

 

[Yakuda]

Only the completely stupid would be taken in by your obvious non sequiturs. The only person fantasising about the mechanics of rape, is you. Rape by definition, requires penetration, though not necessarily by the penis. Not all rape results in pregnancy. Some do. The stupidity of your intervention would beggar belief if it was made by anyone else.

I mentioned rape after someone else did einstein.

 

[Temujin]

I mentioned rape after someone else did einstein.

As this post was not aimed at you, your point is moot, Darwin.

 

[Yakuda]

As this post was not aimed at you, your point is moot, Darwin.

Then don't reply to with with such an inane response skippy.