The reason the climate science hot shot models fail, they don't understand science

A

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member


Take 102 models and look how not a single one comes close to accurate.

Dr Christie is a threat to the karbon shamen.

The CARM influencers are angry and wrong.

The real science is a threat to the carbon hoi polloi gravy trains.

Take a rational simple example. They 'say" the climate is going to get drier. More extensive droughts.

How can the earth get "warmer' without increasing ocean evaporation? Regardless of how old you think the world is, pretty much all, ALL the water evaporated condenses and falls back down.
 
Authentic Nouveau said:


Take 102 models and look how not a single one comes close to accurate.

Dr Christie is a threat to the karbon shamen.

The CARM influencers are angry and wrong.

The real science is a threat to the carbon hoi polloi gravy trains.

Take a rational simple example. They 'say" the climate is going to get drier. More extensive droughts.

How can the earth get "warmer' without increasing ocean evaporation? Regardless of how old you think the world is, pretty much all, ALL the water evaporated condenses and falls back down.
Click to expand...
“Christy’s stance on climate change puts him at odds with many colleagues. The vast majority of climate scientists readily admit that climate change is real,

…

In recent years, Christy has become a favorite of conservative legislators, who often request his advice on environmental issues in order to give their anti-environmental claims credibility. Christy gives lawmakers opposed to environmentalism a credible voice to dismiss climate change.”
 
Backup said:
“Christy’s stance on climate change puts him at odds with many colleagues. The vast majority of climate scientists readily admit that climate change is real,

…

In recent years, Christy has become a favorite of conservative legislators, who often request his advice on environmental issues in order to give their anti-environmental claims credibility. Christy gives lawmakers opposed to environmentalism a credible voice to dismiss climate change.”
Click to expand...


Take 102 models and look how not a single one comes close to accurate.
Click to expand...

Tell us why not a single one comes close. Not one.

Go back 20 years, look at temps
pull up 102 models and see what they predicted 20 years ago.

They all missed by a mile. You are at odds with reality.
 
Authentic Nouveau said:
ALL the water evaporated condenses and falls back down.
Click to expand...
Not on Venus, and not when it is decided that tinkering with cloud cover might be a good idea. Bill Gates, George Soros et al. are all of the opinion that we need more cloud cover to prevent global warming, but Venus has a lot of cloud cover and Venus doesn't appear to be cooling.

Climate manipulation technologies have been going on for over 100 years, and the patents for new technologies for manipulating the environment continue to accrue at the patent office.
 
Authentic Nouveau said:


Take 102 models and look how not a single one comes close to accurate.

Dr Christie is a threat to the karbon shamen.
Click to expand...
Dr. Christie is not a threat. He's one of their star cheerleaders! We know this because as long as we're talking about CO2, corporate mass polluters will continue to pump mega tons of toxic pollution into the air, streams, oceans, etc. with impunity.

This is a blatant, and pointless distraction from the real problem which is toxic pollution. Everyone on this planet has copious amounts of toxic crap that can easily found even in umbilical cords. Until you see someone in Congress bring up that topic, you can rest assured that they're nothing more than paid shills for their corporate sponsors.

They are quite effectively playing both sides of this scam perfectly.
 
shnarkle said:
Not on Venus, and not when it is decided that tinkering with cloud cover might be a good idea. Bill Gates, George Soros et al. are all of the opinion that we need more cloud cover to prevent global warming, but Venus has a lot of cloud cover and Venus doesn't appear to be cooling.

Climate manipulation technologies have been going on for over 100 years, and the patents for new technologies for manipulating the environment continue to accrue at the patent office.
Click to expand...
I have never heard of one that had potential to do more than short term local weather event change.
 
Backup said:
“Christy’s stance on climate change puts him at odds with many colleagues. The vast majority of climate scientists readily admit that climate change is real,

…

In recent years, Christy has become a favorite of conservative legislators, who often request his advice on environmental issues in order to give their anti-environmental claims credibility. Christy gives lawmakers opposed to environmentalism a credible voice to dismiss climate change.”
Click to expand...
He admits climate change is real.
He admits he tracked 102 activist/scientists and every one cranked out a bad model because they like you don't uinderstand the science and modeling.

Why do 102 out of 102 not even come close to reality with their stupid models?

Stupid models and 50 years of junk predictions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top