The Resurrection Body of Christ

G

guest1

Guest
Agreed. Are we arguing at cross purposes here?


I am not saying they believed they would have no bodies (though I do not think that is certain). I am saying the bodies were of a different nature - of spiritual matter (in some sense) rather than flesh and blood,


I am. Apologies if I have not been clear, I am discussing what the earliest Christians believed, including Paul. I have tried to qualify what I have said to make that clear but likely slipped a few times.

I do not believe there was an empty tomb, and I do not think Paul believed that either; I think it was made up later. Paul believed Jesus was raised in a new spiritual body, which may well have been physical, but was not flesh and blood. The idea that Jesus was raised in his original body, complete with crucifixion wounds, came later.
Lets look at what spiritual actually means from the bible in relation to our bodies.

Phil 3:20-21
For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; 21 who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself.
NASB

Rom 8:11
But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who indwells you.
NASB

Believers bodies will be transformed from its current state which is corrupt, sinful mortal to a body like His which Incorruptible, Holy/Sinless and Immortal in the Resurrection as per 1 Cor 15, Romans 8:11, Phil 3:21.

And when we compare the above with Paul in these passages below we see that the body(soma) in the context is a real material body which is physical in the Resurrection but controlled completely by the Spirit in the afterlife.

Natural(psychikos) body
Spiritual(pneumatikos) body


1 Cor 15:44
it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.

Below we see how Paul uses and contrasts the words natural (psychikos) and spiritual (pneumatikos) below;


1 Cor 2:14-16
14
But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. 15 But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no man.

Paul is clearly contrasting the unsaved with the saved with the natural man and spiritual man. One is controlled by the natural or the flesh while the other is controlled by the spirit/spiritual- Holy Spirit. Just like in 1 Cor 15:44 where Paul is contrasting the natural body that is controlled by the flesh with the spiritual body that is controlled by the Spirit. Both are real physical bodies but the difference is one is controlled by the flesh which is carnal and the other is controlled by the Spirit and is spiritual. One has the appetites and desires of the flesh while the other has appetites and desires controlled by the Spirit. Hence a spiritual body is one that is controlled by the Spirit of God in the Resurrection.

Paul’s usage below of spiritual(pneumatikos) in 1 Cor 10 where he calls the rock, food and drink spiritual it does not mean an immaterial rock, food and drink but a real Rock, Manna and Water which were with the Israelites in the wilderness wanderings.

1 Cor 10:1-4
For I do not want you to be unaware, brethren, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; 2 and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea; 3 and all ate the same spiritual food; 4 and all drank the same spiritual drink, for they were drinking from aspiritual rock which followed them; and the rock was Christ.

Now Paul drives home the point of our new literal physical bodies below in heaven from the text in 2nd Cor 5 below;

2 Cor 5:1-5
For we know that when this earthly tent we live in is taken down (that is, when we die and leave this earthly body), we will have a house in heaven, an eternal body made for us by God himself and not by human hands. 2 We grow weary in our present bodies, and we long to put on our heavenly bodies like new clothing. 3 For we will put on heavenly bodies; we will not be spirits without bodies. 4 While we live in these earthly bodies, we groan and sigh, but it's not that we want to die and get rid of these bodies that clothe us. Rather, we want to put on our new bodies so that these dying bodies will be swallowed up by life. 5 God himself has prepared us for this, and as a guarantee he has given us his Holy Spirit.

You see there is no bodiless spirit men in heaven unclothed(no body) but indeed with a heavenly body(like Jesus) has now in heaven which is flesh and bones like He said His Resurrected body was to His Disciples.

hope this helps,
 

Manfred

Well-known member
exactly. Mortal bodies do not inherit eternity. A soul must receive an eternal body from heaven
Ok, yes, that's your doctrine.
You are promoting the idea of a bloodless corpse as our new body.
Can you acknowledge that Jesus said to the disciples that he was flesh and bones and not a Spirit? I can it is there in sceipture:
Luk_24:39 See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.”

Can you acknowledge that Jesus had a bloodless body and that Jesus was very much active and coherent (not a corpse as you claim) and that He appeared to the Disciples from behind locked doors and windows.

I am sure you cannot acknowledge these things because they refute you.

Can you prove anyone promoting a bloodless corpse as you accuse.
Resurrection of a corpse on it's own means no longer a corpse, why would you think anyone promotes such a thing.
Resurrection of a corpse does not mean resurrection of a spirit.
 

ReverendRV

Well-known member
I will suggest that the Atheists here, know the Church teaches the Bodily Resurrection of Jesus Christ; in the Flesh...

To try and persuade them otherwise, is to Patronize their comprehension skills when the Bible quotes Jesus saying, "Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have.”
 
Last edited:
G

guest1

Guest
As I understand this particular thread, the posters here are not necessarily Christian, but I thought it might be interesting to put some ideas out here about the Bible.
This one is about the kind of body Christ got after He died and resurrected. While it is not a standard Christian idea, the Bible has many verses that tell a different story from standard Christianity.
When He died, He left that body behind in the tomb and His soul went to the place of the dead. When he resurrected, He received a body from heaven and His old fleshly body was disposed of.
One of the first clues in the Bible was that when He resurrected and appeared to those who knew Him, nobody recognized Him by His face or voice.
This irritates Christians, but it seems to be what the Bible teaches.
Lets not make assumptions based on ones jaded ideas. Lets examine the bible in depth on the topic.

Jesus said a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have. Blood is the life of both man and animal. In 1 Cor 15 it also represents the corruptible body which the bible says cannot inherit the kingdom of God. Jesus resurrected body was no longer corruptible but was a new glorified body of flesh and bones.

Luke 24:39
39 " See My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself; touch Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have."

1 Cor 15:50-51-
50 Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.


Paul not only states that one of the main tenants of the gospel is the belief that Jesus rose from the dead, but in verse 17, he goes on to say that “if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins.” For centuries, Christians have taught and defended the doctrine of the resurrection – teaching that Jesus physically rose in the same human body in which He died. Notice the correlation between the perishable human body and the imperishable resurrected body as described in 1 Corinthians 15:42-44:
“So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.”


The Greek term, soma” for “body” is always used in Scripture to refer to physical nature. Likewise, the term “spiritual” is used in the Scripture to denote “supernatural” behavior—not a “spiritual” essence of being. Thus, the phrase “spiritual body” in the passage above speaks of a “physical supernatural” body—not a “spirit body.” Another example of the term “spiritual” referring to “supernatural” behavior is 1 Corinthians 2:15 where we read, “But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no man.” The “spiritual” person in both of these passages is behaving in a “supernatural” way, not ontologically transforming “human” essence into “spirit” essence.

1 CORINTHIANS 15:50: “Now I say this, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable.” Ron Rhodes
Jehovah’s Witnesses claim that Jesus could not have risen in His human body of flesh and bones, because Scripture states that “flesh and blood” cannot inherit the kingdom of God. Notice that Jesus did not say that His resurrected body was made of “flesh and blood.” Rather, He said His body was made of “flesh and bone” (Luke 24:39). This is significant because the term “flesh and blood” is often used in Scripture to refer to mortal humanity,in contrast to the imperishable, resurrected body alluded to by the phrase, “flesh and bones.”
As noted earlier, Jesus’ blood provided the atonement for sin. He did not take His “blood” back, but merely resurrected his body of flesh and bones. Far from claiming that the resurrected human body cannot inherit God’s kingdom, this passage asserts that the mortal, perishable human body (made of flesh and blood) cannot inherit the immortal, imperishable kingdom of God. Indeed as 1 Corinthians 15:53 states, “this perishable must put on the imperishable, and this mortal must put on immortality.”

A spiritual body denotes an immortal body. A spiritual body is one that is dominated by the spirit, not one that is devoid of matter. The Greek word pneumatikos means a body that is directed by the spirit as opposed to one under the dominion of the flesh. It is not ruled by the flesh that perishes but by the spirit that endures. (1 Cor 15:50-58). A spiritual body does no mean immaterial or invisible but immortal and imperishable. Paul makes these parallels:

Earthly- Heavenly (verse 40)
Perishable- Imperishable (verse 42)
Weak- Powerful (verse 43)
Natural-Supernatural (verse 44)
Mortal- Immortal (verse 53)

The content shows that spiritual (pneumatikos) could be translated supernatural in contrast to natural from the parallels of perishable and imperishable, corruptible and incorruptible. Pneumatikos is translated supernatural in 1 Cor 10:4 regarding the supernatural rock that followed them in the wilderness. In the translation spiritual refers to physical objects. In 1 Cor 10:45 Paul spoke of the spiritual rock that followed Israel in the wilderness from which they got spiritual drink 1 Cor 10:4.But the OT story (Ex 17,Num 20)reveals it was a physical rock from which they got literal water to drink. The actual water they drank from the material rock was produced supernaturally. Further Paul spoke about a spiritual man 1 Cor 2:15 he obviously did not mean an invisible, immaterial man with no corporeal body. He was as a matter of fact speaking of a flesh and blood human being whose life is lived by the supernatural power of God, a literal person whose life is Spirit directed. A spiritual man is one who is taught by the Spirit and who receives the things that come from the Spirit of God. (1 Cor 2:13-14). The resurrection body can be called a spiritual body in much the same way we speak of the bible being a spiritual book. Regardless of their spiritual source and power both the resurrection body and the bible are material objects.

Life giving Spirit does not speak of the nature of Christ’s resurrected body but of the divine origin of the resurrection. Jesus physical body came back to life only by the power of God. (Rom 1:4). Paul is speaking about its spiritual source not its physical substance as a material body. If spirit describes the nature of Christ’s resurrected body then Adam with whom He is contrasted must not have a soul since he is described as of the earth, made of dust (verse 47). But the bible clearly says that Adam was a living soul (Gen 2:7). Christ’s body is called a spiritual body (soma) which always means a physical body when referring to an individual human being. The resurrected body is called spiritual and life giving spirit because its source is in the spiritual realm, not because its substance is immaterial. Christ’s supernatural resurrection body is from heaven as Adams natural body was from the earth. (verse 47). But just as the one from earth has an immaterial soul even so the One from heaven has a material body.


1 Cor 15:50-54
50 I declare to you, brothers, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 51 Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed— 52 in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. 53 For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality. 54 When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: "Death has been swallowed up in victory."

Paul said earlier in the chapter if Christ be not risen your faith is in vain and you are still dead in your sins- an unbeliever who is lost. Those who deny the physical bodily resurrection of Jesus such as the JW's who teach that Jesus is now a spirit based being fit into this camp. They deny the resurrection.

If we look at what Paul is saying in this passage, it is that corruptible flesh and blood shall not enter the kingdom. Paul says corruptible does not inherit the incorruptible. Paul is not saying the resurrection body will not have flesh but what he declares is that resurrected body will not have perishable flesh. Remember in Luke Jesus said see here My hands and feet, touch Me a spirit/ghost does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have. Peter, Paul and John all agree that Jesus still had flesh well after His ascension. 1 John being the last of the books of the three Apostles declared that Jesus having come in the flesh and those who deny this are the spirit of antichrist. John makes it clear that the Incarnation was permanent. Jesus is forever both God and man. This is what Paul teaches in the whole 15th chapter of 1 Corinthians. The glorious physical bodies that we will have in the resurrection. We will have incorruptible bodies just as Jesus now has in heaven.

Soul= immortal, imperishable and
Flesh=mortal, perishable.

Now in the resurrection in 1 cor 15 the perishable (your body now ) with put on the imperishable(body that does not perish). Just as we see with Jesus Resurrected body it is physical, has flesh and bones, the scars from His crucifixion which proves it was the same body but had changed from mortal to immortal.

hope this helps,
 

The Pixie

Well-known member
Yet Jesus said His resurrected body was flesh and so did Paul in 1 Cor 15.
I do not think they did. I see nothing in 1 Cor 15 where Paul said that, in fact I think he is specifically saying flesh and blood will not be allowed in the kingdom of God. With regards to Jesus, I think those words were put in his mouth, after the beliefs changed.

Job declared after his body was rotted away and eaten by worms he would see God in the future in his flesh .
I will acknowledge that that is a puzzler. But does it make sense to say he will see God in the flesh, after the flesh has rotted away?

And I dare / challenge anyone anywhere to find where soma used in the NT is not physical and can mean immaterial . I’ve studied the topic for 45 years and know every usage in the NT.
I am not saying spiritual in the sense of immaterial, but in the sense of being closer to God. A spiritual body, made of spiritual matter rather than flesh and blood, is one that is closer to God.

You do realize there are secular sources/ historians that acknowledge his life, death and resurrection and that his followers died for that cause don't you ?
I am dubious there are any secular scholars who acknowledge his resurrection.

I am not suggesting it was all made up. I am reasonably certain the disciples saw something they were convinced was the risen Jesus, but they saw it in Galilee, not Jerusalem, as is apparent from Mark (I would further guess Peter saw it first, and was on a boat). I do think much of the passion was made up, however.
 
G

guest1

Guest
I do not think they did. I see nothing in 1 Cor 15 where Paul said that, in fact I think he is specifically saying flesh and blood will not be allowed in the kingdom of God. With regards to Jesus, I think those words were put in his mouth, after the beliefs changed.


I will acknowledge that that is a puzzler. But does it make sense to say he will see God in the flesh, after the flesh has rotted away?


I am not saying spiritual in the sense of immaterial, but in the sense of being closer to God. A spiritual body, made of spiritual matter rather than flesh and blood, is one that is closer to God.


I am dubious there are any secular scholars who acknowledge his resurrection.

I am not suggesting it was all made up. I am reasonably certain the disciples saw something they were convinced was the risen Jesus, but they saw it in Galilee, not Jerusalem, as is apparent from Mark (I would further guess Peter saw it first, and was on a boat). I do think much of the passion was made up, however.
Would you die and be tortured for something that was made up, a lie let alone the truth or would you deny it if it was true to spare your own life ?
 

The Pixie

Well-known member
Would you die and be tortured for something that was made up, a lie let alone the truth or would you deny it if it was true to spare your own life ?
I do not doubt that they all believed utterly in the resurrection of Jesus. Nevertheless, I am sure some parts of the passion were made up later - in part because the disciples did not actually know what happened, so went to the OT for inspiration.
 

Sethproton

Well-known member
I didn't claim Scripture is irrelevant, I claimed your "argument" about John is irrelevant given what Scripture says about the Resurrection of Jesus.
My argument was the facts about what John saw and said. You are claiming those things are irrelevant
 
G

guest1

Guest
My argument was the facts about what John saw and said. You are claiming those things are irrelevant
John did not know what heaven would be like since he was alive at the time he wrote the epistle. So that was Johns point which has nothing whatsoever to do with your idea.

The problem is for you and what every single cultist and false teacher does is try and ISOLATE a passage not only from its immediate context, chapter, book but the rest of the bible that contradicts their conclusion from their ISOLATED verse ripped out from the rest of Scripture.

That has been your method over the years and has not changed. And we are patiently waiting for you for once to use a lexicon and exegete a single passage.

Your method which is the exact opposite of mine is called eisegesis by scholars and theologians. I have already in many posts in this thread demonstrated exegetical principles from the immediate context, defining words, showing how the author uses them and then using the rest of scripture in unison to demonstrate its truth.

If you were to try that type of defense in a courtroom to defend your beliefs you would get laughed out of the courtroom for a lack of evidence and testimony that cannot back up its claims and assumptions. You have no evidence for your claims.

The physical, bodily Resurrection can be proven in a court of law by its evidence just as any other historical fact can be verified by the evidence.

hope this helps !!!
 

4Him

Administrator
Staff member
Agreed. Are we arguing at cross purposes here?


I am not saying they believed they would have no bodies (though I do not think that is certain). I am saying the bodies were of a different nature - of spiritual matter (in some sense) rather than flesh and blood,

Yet someone in this thread is arguing that isn't a 'body'
I am. Apologies if I have not been clear, I am discussing what the earliest Christians believed, including Paul. I have tried to qualify what I have said to make that clear but likely slipped a few times.

I do not believe there was an empty tomb, and I do not think Paul believed that either; I think it was made up later. Paul believed Jesus was raised in a new spiritual body, which may well have been physical, but was not flesh and blood. The idea that Jesus was raised in his original body, complete with crucifixion wounds, came later.

No, it didn't come later, since Jesus is the one that said it.
 

4Him

Administrator
Staff member
My argument was the facts about what John saw and said. You are claiming those things are irrelevant

No, I am not...I am claiming it is irrelevant to your argument about Jesus not being raised in literal body of flesh and bone.
 
G

guest1

Guest
Oh and @Sethproton is you ever studied and researched the Resurrection you would know there have been several atheist's and agnostics who have set out to disprove the resurrection and later through their research have been convinced of its truth and validity. Some while setting out to disprove like you are doing have been persuaded and converted to the Christian Faith because of the evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus.

So there is still hope for you if you honestly seek the truth about the bodily Resurrection and Ascension of Jesus.

I have several of those books I could recommend if you are sincerely interested in knowing the truth instead of fighting against the truth with no knowledge of the topic. Your arguments are purely those of a skeptic that has not looked into or examined the evidence for the Resurrection of Christ.

Let me know as I have a whole shelf of Scholarly books on the topic. I can recommend some depending upon your level of education and steer you in the right direction accordingly.

hope this helps !!!
 
G

guest1

Guest
1. The corruptible will "put on" the incorruptible (1 Cor. 15:53, 54). A natural body does not yet have this.

2. They are like the angels in that they "neither marry, nor are given in marriage."


Christ's physical resurrection
1. He had "flesh and bones" (Luke 24:39).
2. He offered to show the marks from the nails in His hands and the mark from the spear that was thrust into His side (John 20:27).
3. He ate fish (Luke 24:41-43).
4. The disciples took hold of His feet (Matthew 28:9).
Ditto !
 
G

guest1

Guest
I would imagine someone who was creamated might receive a new body..BUT...the "new body" Jesus got still has scars.
If you doubt that...ask Thomas.
I'm reminded of Jesus words to Thomas afterwards because his faith was only by sight. Blessed are those who believe and yet do not see. We are dealing with someone who lacks biblical faith. And we know there is so much biblical evidence for His bodily (physical ) Resurrection/Ascension.

John 20:29
Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”
 

Sethproton

Well-known member
I do not doubt that they all believed utterly in the resurrection of Jesus. Nevertheless, I am sure some parts of the passion were made up later - in part because the disciples did not actually know what happened, so went to the OT for inspiration.
I wonder about your position, is it based on some facts, or is it conjecture based on trying to reconstruct what we know?
 
Last edited:

Sethproton

Well-known member
Can you acknowledge that Jesus said to the disciples that he was flesh and bones and not a Spirit? I can it is there in sceipture:
Luk_24:39 See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself. Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.”

Can you acknowledge that Jesus had a bloodless body and that Jesus was very much active and coherent (not a corpse as you claim) and that He appeared to the Disciples from behind locked doors and windows.

I am sure you cannot acknowledge these things because they refute you.

Can you prove anyone promoting a bloodless corpse as you accuse.
Resurrection of a corpse on it's own means no longer a corpse, why would you think anyone promotes such a thing.
Resurrection of a corpse does not mean resurrection of a spirit.
I find it interesting that you are promoting a bloodless body, but you object to me calling it a bloodless corpse which means body.
Or did you not know that corpse means body?
By the way, have you looked at any of the verses presented by me and others in this thread that state their are two bodies?
Have you ever heard of the city in texas called Corpus Christi? The corpse of Christ.
 
G

guest1

Guest
I find it interesting that you are promoting a bloodless body, but you object to me calling it a bloodless corpse which means body.
Or did you not know that corpse means body?
By the way, have you looked at any of the verses presented by me and others in this thread that state their are two bodies?
Have you ever heard of the city in texas called Corpus Christi? The corpse of Christ.
Have you ever heard of a bodiless resurrection?

Talk about a walking talking contradiction
 

Manfred

Well-known member
I find it interesting that you are promoting a bloodless body, but you object to me calling it a bloodless corpse which means body.
Or did you not know that corpse means body?
By the way, have you looked at any of the verses presented by me and others in this thread that state their are two bodies?
Have you ever heard of the city in texas called Corpus Christi? The corpse of Christ.
Corpse means a lifeless dead body.

The way you write is af is Jesus was a corpse after He was resurrected.
That is a really silly stance to take and denies He was made alive.

That is your aim though,to try and make the resurrection of a corpse null and void

It's also quite unsurprising that you refuse to acknowledge that Jesus had a tangible body and that He Himself said He was not a Spirit after appearing in the midst of people who locked themselves in a room

You always claim you engage and talk about scripture when people engage you,but from your response it would seem you don't as you ignored those scriptures without even an acknowledgment.

You stand refuted. Jesus died on the cross and His corpse was bound with burial cloth and placed in a tomb. It was His corpse that was resurrected and was made alive again. Raised from the dead. He appeared to the disciples in a locked room and told them that He was not a Spirit.

As you deny the resurrection of the dead, you are to be pitied most of all as Paul writes
 
G

guest1

Guest
Corpse means a lifeless dead body.

The way you write is af is Jesus was a corpse after He was resurrected.
That is a really silly stance to take and denies He was made alive.

That is your aim though,to try and make the resurrection of a corpse null and void

It's also quite unsurprising that you refuse to acknowledge that Jesus had a tangible body and that He Himself said He was not a Spirit after appearing in the midst of people who locked themselves in a room

You always claim you engage and talk about scripture when people engage you,but from your response it would seem you don't as you ignored those scriptures without even an acknowledgment.

You stand refuted. Jesus died on the cross and His corpse was bound with burial cloth and placed in a tomb. It was His corpse that was resurrected and was made alive again. Raised from the dead. He appeared to the disciples in a locked room and told them that He was not a Spirit.

As you deny the resurrection of the dead, you are to be pitied most of all as Paul writes
Amen his heterodox views are being exposed for what they really are unbiblical.
 
Top