Sethproton
Well-known member
red herringDo you understand the present tense verb ? or the present active participle ?
red herringDo you understand the present tense verb ? or the present active participle ?
no its basic truth and logic which you deny in favor of your Gnosticism that teaches Jesus was and is not a man or God.red herring
Because you are clearly ignoring what the new testament statesDo you understand the plumb line? What that means? It is the standard of right. If you did think that thru then I wonder why you say it does not change your thinking.
Incorrect. It's called comparing scripture with scripture 1 Cor. 2:13.How is it you ignore what scripture states and you add to texts what is not there
They call that twisting scripture
Sorry comparing scripture with scripture does not allow one to rewrite scriptureIncorrect. It's called comparing scripture with scripture
It surely can, but I don't expect you to understand that.Sorry comparing scripture with scripture does not allow one to rewrite scripture
Nowhere is such a definition found
World simply does not mean elect or sheep or those not destined to wrath etc
Produce a verse that says just thatIt surely can, but I don't expect you to understand that.
You will get the exact same results with this person as well who refuses to answer questions. Many here believe they are one in the same person as an FYI.Produce a verse that says just that
not one where you must read it into the text
and explain how that can be in the context
John 12:47 (KJV)
47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.
John 3:17 (KJV)
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
John 3:14-18 (KJV)
14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:
15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
It surely can, but I don't expect you to understand that.
No it's using the Biblical hermeneutic : comparing scripture with scripture 1 Cor. 2:13.Whenever thats what you want, right?
No it's using the Biblical hermeneutic : comparing scripture with scripture 1 Cor. 2:13.
Incorrect. It's called comparing scripture with scriptureHow is it you ignore what scripture states and you add to texts what is not there
They call that twisting scripture
Incorrect. It's called comparing scripture with scripture
Yes I remember seeing that statedYou will get the exact same results with this person as well who refuses to answer questions. Many here believe they are one in the same person as an FYI.
Amen which is what we suppose to do 1 Cor 2:13Incorrect. It's called comparing scripture with scripture
What you guys do is not comparing scripture with scripture. What you do is read your view into scripture and then ignore all the scriptural contradictionsAmen which is what we suppose to do 1 Cor 2:13
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
You have a problem, you dont believe in the saving results of the Death of Christ. You teach that people He died for shall yet be damned for their sins !What you guys do is not comparing scripture with scripture. What you do is read your view into scripture and then ignore all the scriptural contradictions
BTW before you can compare scripture with scripture you have to understand each verse you are going to compare in its context
and context is your enemy
What I don't believe is the defective manner in which you two interpret (sic) scriptureYou have a problem, you dont believe in the saving results of the Death of Christ. You teach that people He died for shall yet be damned for their sins !
Again, that's a serious issue when you teach that those Christ died for are yet damned or their sins. How does that honor Christ my friend ?What I don't believe is the defective manner in which you two interpret (sic) scripture
What you guys do is not comparing scripture with scripture. What you do is read your view into scripture and then ignore all the scriptural contradictions
BTW before you can compare scripture with scripture you have to understand each verse you are going to compare in its context
and context is your enemy
Clearly it honors the magnitude of the love of God and ChristAgain, that's a serious issue when you teach that those Christ died for are yet damned or their sins. How does that honor Christ my friend ?