The influenza and covid-19 viruses are very different viruses with minimal sequence homology.it was taken using the obsolete test** on an asymptomatic 62 yr old female and not a group according to this.
Virus Isolation (SOVI) by Morell, Cowan & Kaufman
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimallyandrewkaufmanmd.com
here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms (she was asymptomatic) which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness...
** From your link.
Hygiene at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), as described previously (
---------
That looks like the test that was rendered obsolete referenced in my previous post. Perhaps two pages back. Because the test failed to distinguish the difference between flu and C-19.
So it sounds like you still have a difference in opinion among experts and the errors are things that i have been able to pull but it does sound reasonable to use multiple sick people and not just one 62 yr old asymptomatic female. That means she was not even sick.
The twelve behind COVID misinformation
- Thread starter inertia
- Start date
Steven Avery
Well-known member
Do you really believe that the (generally beneficial) detoxification of the flu is caused by a "virus"?
One that hijacks cell replication, bursts cells, and all that stuff?
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
As a medical and also a science research outsider, you have no authority to establish boundaries.
Your handbook when you are outside of a rational argument.
RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
I have no idea what you mean by "detoxification of the flu".
Flu is indeed caused by a virus, the influenza virus.
All viruses have small genomes and depend on cellular genes to complete their replication cycle after infecting a cell. Some viruses are lytic and will burst cells open, releasing progeny virions. Influenza does not do that. Its new particles are released from the infected cell by budding:
Influenza A: Understanding the Viral Life Cycle
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Harry Leggs
Super Member
Which has not one thing to do with my post. The point being the so called gold standard test could not distinguish between flu and C-19 and that is why it was removed. Prior it was touted as gold standard.
inertia
Super Member
That is why peer-reviewed, refereed, scientific journals should be used when sharing scientific information.
The most prestigious journals, such as Nature, are scrupulous in selecting papers for publication. Many scientific journals have higher rejection rates than others - even up to 90% of the papers they receive. Sometimes several months have elapsed since submission.
Reading and sharing these kinds of papers doesn't require specialized "insider" knowledge from a particular cohort. It's about sharing valid science. It's never been about insider information or one's authority on a given subject.
Last edited:
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
So 15 days to flatten the curve 500 days ago.
Masks didn't work
PCR tests don't work well
Lockdowns didn't work
The jab is not working.
Social distancing didn't work
Steven Avery
Well-known member
Is this a reference to:
Complete Genome Sequence of a SARS-CoV-2 Strain Isolated in Northern Germany
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7272567/
Do you have the exact title in Nature?
Maybe a url.
Thanks!
inertia
Super Member
Searching...
This applied research was originally published by the Journal "American Society for Microbiology". Similar to Nature, this journal rigorously applies peer-review with working scientists globally.
(ASM Journals publish 26% of all microbiology articles and contribute 44% of all microbiology citations as of 2018.)
Here is the URL: https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/MRA.00520-20
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Sources say
Bonnie
Super Member
I am surprised Adams isn't on there, also. Especially after I listened to one of his rants a few months ago:
Situation Update, Mar 26, 2021 - Vaccinated people are walking biological time bombs
Today's sponsor is the Satellite Phone Store: http://www.MetalsWithMike.com For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world...
Remember this?
No Jab for me...here's why...Web site
When it hits the fan, I promise I won't say...I told you so. You're bible speaks of a one world order...is the trib about to begin? Revelation is rife with symbolism, and too many people take much of its symbolism too lliterally, or incorrectly. 75% of the symbolism is based upon the OT. But...
forums.carm.org
Look at some of the wild claims he made in this video.
It is absolutely....awful. And this guy runs Natural News. And some people LIKE this website?? And try to use it to support their anti-C-vaccination opinions?
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
Can ya'll name the documented source of lying that doubled down and insisted Michael Mann (from global warming Mannia) won Nobel Peace Prize?
Double source of misinformation. The same global warming fear mongers pivot to Wuhan Fru fear mongering.
Double source of misinformation. The same global warming fear mongers pivot to Wuhan Fru fear mongering.
Bonnie
Super Member
Aren't there separate tests for covid and inflluenza? They are not the same disease at all, despite sharing some of the same symptoms.
Bonnie
Super Member
Interesting...I didn't know flu viruses "budded". Thanks for the new news (to me, anyway).
inertia
Super Member
I am surprised Adams isn't on there, also. Especially after I listened to one of his rants a few months ago:
Situation Update, Mar 26, 2021 - Vaccinated people are walking biological time bombs
Today's sponsor is the Satellite Phone Store: http://www.MetalsWithMike.com For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world...web.archive.org
Remember this?
No Jab for me...here's why...Web site
When it hits the fan, I promise I won't say...I told you so. You're bible speaks of a one world order...is the trib about to begin? Revelation is rife with symbolism, and too many people take much of its symbolism too lliterally, or incorrectly. 75% of the symbolism is based upon the OT. But...forums.carm.org
Look at some of the wild claims he made in this video.
It is absolutely....awful. And this guy runs Natural News. And some people LIKE this website?? And try to use it to support their anti-C-vaccination opinions?
Yes, I do remember the thread. Thanks for sharing a portion of it again for reference.
( opening now...)
The web archive would not allow the video to be viewed. hmm...
Last edited:
COVID cases are twice as high in Republican counties than in Democrat counties, despite Democratic counties being more densely populated.
obviously your source is a crazy, anti-science conspiracy blog
Dr Saeed Qureshi: His Life & Work Advancing Empirical Science | Principia Scientific Intl.
Dr Saeed Qureshi came to the only logical conclusion: if an invalid test is used, there can be no valid results. He was referring to a test – the drug dissolution test – used worldwide in the pharmaceutical industry. He not only recognized the flaw in the testing protocol, but created the...principia-scientific.com
What is interesting is that a climate denier blog has now largely become a COVID denial blog.
I started a thread about this the other week and got a lot of pushback, even though my observation was obviously correct, as always.
inertia
Super Member
it was taken using the obsolete test** on an asymptomatic 62 yr old female and not a group according to this.
Virus Isolation (SOVI) by Morell, Cowan & Kaufman
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally
here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms (she was asymptomatic) which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness...
** From your link.
Hygiene at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf by real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), as described previously (
---------
That looks like the test that was rendered obsolete referenced in my previous post. Perhaps two pages back. Because the test failed to distinguish the difference between flu and C-19.
So it sounds like you still have a difference in opinion among experts and the errors are things that i have been able to pull but it does sound reasonable to use multiple sick people and not just one 62 yr old asymptomatic female. That means she was not even sick.
Quantitative multiplexed real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the "gold standard". It's not obsolete.
"sounds like" doesn't hold any water