The twelve behind COVID misinformation

inertia

Super Member
I agree. While we should not be living in fear over covid, neither should we be dismissive about it, and ignore its potential dangers. My husband knew a pastor in his 50's, in good health, who did not take covid seriously, and never took precautions. He died of covid 5 months ago.

It is always best to be wise and prudent about covid-19, realize its potential for transmission and seriousness, and take necessary precautions. That just shows good, common sense, to minimize exposure to a potentially serious disease.

...in his 50's! Wow 😲


 

Carol

Well-known member
Even if ^that^ were true, it's always wise to protect oneself and one's family. Misinformation as shown throughout this thread is never in the category of "good". Real, honest, careful, evaluation based on the best information available is a better strategy.



An unrelenting mistrust and suspicion of hard-working scientists, especially when there is no reason to be suspicious, is an unsound attitude when rational action is readily accessible.

A coffee enema isn't a sound treatment for COVID-19. No, vaccines do not magnetize people. Vitamin supplements do not cure COVID-19.

Do you find logical fallacies convincing?

Scientists are just as fallible as the rest of us.

There is plenty of reason to distrust government and industry.

...and God wanted Paul to communicate truth concerning governing authorities and our behavior/ attitude about them for all time.



That's your opinion.

A government of, by and for the people, with a Bill of Rights.

You'd rather have rulers?
 

Carol

Well-known member
I agree. While we should not be living in fear over covid, neither should we be dismissive about it, and ignore its potential dangers.

Do you always go to such extremes?

My husband knew a pastor in his 50's, in good health, who did not take covid seriously, and never took precautions. He died of covid 5 months ago.

It is always best to be wise and prudent about covid-19, realize its potential for transmission and seriousness, and take necessary precautions.
That just shows good, common sense, to minimize exposure to a potentially serious disease.
 

Bonnie

Super Member
Do you always go to such extremes?
Where are the "extremes" in my post?? What I posted about that pastor is absolutely true. My husband knew him.

And what was "extreme" about what I wrote about taking sensible precautions?

Your definition of "extreme" must be 'way different than mine!
 

Carol

Well-known member
Where are the "extremes" in my post?? What I posted about that pastor is absolutely true. My husband knew him.

And what was "extreme" about what I wrote about taking sensible precautions?

Your definition of "extreme" must be 'way different than mine!

Well maybe you could provide quotes of those dismissing it and ignoring it's potential dangers.

And not buying it's as dangerous as it's being made out to be doesn't count.
 

Bonnie

Super Member
Well maybe you could provide quotes of those dismissing it and ignoring it's potential dangers.

I did--that is what my husband told me twice that his friend believed. He knew this pastor--I did not. But sorry, I cannot quote the pastor who ignored the covid virus' potential dangers--HE'S DEAD FROM IT.
And not buying it's as dangerous as it's being made out to be doesn't count.
Huh? All I wrote is that it is sensible and prudent to take precautions against a disease that can potentially turn dangerous. Which is true.
What is wrong with that?
 
Last edited:

inertia

Super Member
I did--that is what my husband told me his friend did--twice. He knew this pastor--I did not. But sorry, I cannot quote the pastor who ignored the covid virus' potential dangers--HE'S DEAD FROM IT.

Huh? All I wrote is that it is sensible and prudent to take precautions against a disease that can potentially turn dangerous. Which is true.
What is wrong with that?

Using hyperbole:

I have rights.JPG

Yes. We have rights.


 
Last edited:

vibise

Well-known member
Well maybe you could provide quotes of those dismissing it and ignoring it's potential dangers.

And not buying it's as dangerous as it's being made out to be doesn't count.
You contradict yourself.

First you are claiming that no one is ignoring covid or dismissing its dangers.
Then in the next sentence you claim you don't think it is dangerous!!!
 

Carol

Well-known member
I did--that is what my husband told me his friend did--twice.

But what does it have to do with the discussion here? Did you feel a need to warn us?

He knew this pastor--I did not. But sorry, I cannot quote the pastor who ignored the covid virus' potential dangers--HE'S DEAD FROM IT.

Is that what you believe?

Huh? All I wrote is that it is sensible and prudent to take precautions against a disease that can potentially turn dangerous. Which is true.
What is wrong with that?
 

inertia

Super Member
...

That's your opinion.

...

No, in fact, Jesus never interfered with governing authorities and even told people to give the government what was theirs (taxes).

Paul and Peter were correct about governing authorities in our lives.


 
Last edited:

Carol

Well-known member
No, in fact, Jesus never interfered with governing authorities and even told people to give the government what was theirs (taxes).

Paul and Peter were correct about governing authorities in our lives.



So the U.S. republic was against God's will?
We are to have rulers rather than a representative government?
 
Last edited:

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
No, in fact, Jesus never interfered with governing authorities and even told people to give the government what was theirs (taxes).

Paul and Peter were correct about governing authorities in our lives.


But you still insist God was incorrect about the Flood of Noah? You invested a lot of hours denying Biblical Creation.
 

Carol

Well-known member
No, in fact, Jesus never interfered with governing authorities and even told people to give the government what was theirs (taxes).

Paul and Peter were correct about governing authorities in our lives.


So the U.S. republic was against God's will?
We are to have rulers rather than a representative government?

So when you vote are you voting for rulers who'll impose rules you agree with?
Is this a libertarian position?
And your opinion there's nothing wrong with government confiscating people's money and distributing it to business/industry- a libertarian position?
 
Top