670,000 dead Americans would disagree, if they could.Got your hands over your eyes?
The odds of "damage" have been exaggerated.
670,000 dead Americans would disagree, if they could.Got your hands over your eyes?
The odds of "damage" have been exaggerated.
aka. not an effective weapon.The odds of "damage" have been exaggerated.
670,000 dead Americans would disagree, if they could.
The media is a watchdog - if their friends and families were being affected, I couldn't see money shutting them up.Fear and guilt are quite effective ways to manipulate people, aren't they.
Worse, because it only takes a second to hurt yourself, giving you very little time to react to the possibility of it happening.Kinda like shooting yourself in the foot.
Given the jokes that were the election fraud lawsuits and hearings, I no longer consider "sworn affidavits" (or 'affa-davids' as that drunken blonde said in Michigan) to be credible or worth consideration.Please Debunk...
Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum submitted a 27-page ‘Request for Investigation’ to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague back in April 2021 alleging the UK Government and its advisors were complicit in crimes against humanity in the name of Covid-19.
On the 28th of April 2021, the pair received a formal acknowledgement from the ICC and were assigned a case number – ‘141/21’. Since then the pair have been gathering new evidence to use in their ICC claim and have established connections with lawyers and research scientists from around the world.
A new press release released on the 17th August, which can be viewed here, confirms that the pair have received sworn affidavits from leading experts including research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier, and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.
Professor Luc A Montagnier, who won a Nobel prize for his work on the HIV virus, claimed in April 2020 that he believed the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Then in May 2021 the expert virologist stated that “Mass vaccinations are a scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants”.
A new claim has also been submitted to the ICC due to the vast amount of new evidence and information that has come to light in the past few months, and the lawyers say they now have compelling evidence that “the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are deliberately engineered bioweapons that have been released in two phashes on unsuspecting peoples of the world”.
![]()
New evidence, including a sworn affidavit from Prof. Luc A. Montagnier, has been submitted to the International Criminal Court alleging World Governments are complicit in genocide and crimes against humanity
New evidence, including sworn affidavits from leading experts such as Professor Luc A. Montagnier, has been submitted to the International Criminal Court by lawtheexpose.uk
The media is a watchdog - if their friends and families were being affected, I couldn't see money shutting them up.
You would be naive to think otherwise.
aka. not an effective weapon.
It's telling that you omitted my argument when you quoted me, which might be yet another example of right-wing projection (re. accusing others of the very things right wingers are guilty of themselves). Here it is again so that you can respond substantively to it: I have no hopes that you actually will, because running away from points seems to be your specialty, but maybe it'll cause a few of the fence-sitters to reconsider.
A bio-engineered weapon that damages the inventor as much as the inventor's enemy is a terribly-designed weapon.
I thought I heard some quote from Lindsey graham the other day; something about being able to get (if he wanted one) an affidavit swearing that gravity was a communist conspiracy...Given the jokes that were the election fraud lawsuits and hearings, I no longer consider "sworn affidavits" (or 'affa-davids' as that drunken blonde said in Michigan) to be credible or worth consideration.
You don't appear to know what that word means...Well how manipulative of you...aka. not an effective weapon.
It's telling that you omitted my argument when you quoted me, which might be yet another example of right-wing projection (re. accusing others of the very things right wingers are guilty of themselves). Here it is again so that you can respond substantively to it: I have no hopes that you actually will, because running away from points seems to be your specialty, but maybe it'll cause a few of the fence-sitters to reconsider.
A bio-engineered weapon that damages the inventor as much as the inventor's enemy is a terribly-designed weapon.
Then like I said, it's a piss-poor bio-engineered weapon.Like I said - it isn't as big a threat as it's been made out to be.
As a pro-lifer, I'm sadly not surprised to see you pretending that almost three quarters of a million dead people isn't a big deal.But they've been pretty effective at making the majority believe it is.
I don't know. How much?Let's just look at Pfizer. How much have they made?
I presume he could get that from MTG? Or the GED bozo....I thought I heard some quote from Lindsey graham the other day; something about being able to get (if he wanted one) an affidavit swearing that gravity was a communist conspiracy...
Like I said - it isn't as big a threat as it's been made out to be. But they've been pretty effective at making the majority believe it is.
Yes, the woo-peddlers sure like that. Look at Tucker Carlson.Power and money ...
How much has DeSantis made from hawking Regeneron while his citizens die?Let's just look at Pfizer. How much have they made?
You don't appear to know what that word means...
Then like I said, it's a piss-poor bio-engineered weapon.
As a pro-lifer, I'm sadly not surprised to see you pretending that almost three quarters of a million dead people isn't a big deal.
I don't know. How much?
The doctors and scientists have the authority and expertise to make this determination.Not all FROM covid. Not even close.As a pro-lifer, I'm sadly not surprised to see you pretending that almost three quarters of a million dead people isn't a big deal.
So pretty much, all you've got are vague half-truths.Things aren't always what they appear....or what some try to make appear....
But if you convince people it is a big threat, you've got control.
Not all FROM covid. Not even close.
That bit of information might tell you something.
The doctors and scientists have the authority and expertise to make this determination.
You - a partisan voter - do not.
Isn't that what we find in churches?A possible endgame. A population easy to control.
None of this changes the fact that doctors and scientists have the authority and expertise to decide who was killed by COVID, and who was not.And some were determined WITH covid. And some were added from reviewing records. By hospital administrators? And some were determined from having a couple symptoms. Like a headache and stuffy nose?
You posted those CDC guidelines yourself.
You can reject data all you want, but if you want to be taken seriously, you would need an actual reality-based explanation of why those numbers are wrong. So far, your side has not presented anything close to that.Not all FROM covid. Not even close.
And that is just one of the big red flags....
But churches have no army to compell, so faulty comparisonIsn't that what we find in churches?