So does this mean Dark Matter is wrong and MoND is right? Or are there some things Dark matter gets right and MoND gets wrong and we need a third theory to bridge the two?
You've seen the simplified illustrations of the model as shown below:
The Lambda-CDM model where lambda is the cosmological constant and CDM is Cold, Dark Matter is supported by observational evidence; so it is a good physical non-relativistic model.
- The universe is expanding
- Spacetime is flat, not curved
- independent measurements confirm its predictions
These observations (measurements) include the CMB temperature, Cosmic neutrino background, predictions about Nucleosynthesis, and the Universe's acceleration
In the MOND model, mass is treated not as an inherent characteristic of matter, but as an inertial response of matter instead. Clearly, more exploration is needed since a portion of its predictions was found to be correct to date.
_________
NASA