Top oncologist: Cancer in patients exploding after COVID shots

ferengi

Well-known member

'This must be aired and debated immediately'​

The well-established link between the COVID-19 mRNA shots and blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is reason enough to stop the vaccine program, argues a London oncologist.

And further, the average age of death from COVID-19 in the United Kingdom is 82, which is higher than the age for all other causes, 81.
But there is another reason enough to halt the shots, wrote Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London, in a letter to the British Medical Journal.

"As a practising oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel," he wrote to the BMJ's editor in chief, Dr. Kamran Abbasi.
"Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters," he wrote. "They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster – one developing leukaemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long Covid since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder."
 

'This must be aired and debated immediately'​

The well-established link between the COVID-19 mRNA shots and blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is reason enough to stop the vaccine program, argues a London oncologist.

And further, the average age of death from COVID-19 in the United Kingdom is 82, which is higher than the age for all other causes, 81.
But there is another reason enough to halt the shots, wrote Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London, in a letter to the British Medical Journal.

"As a practising oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel," he wrote to the BMJ's editor in chief, Dr. Kamran Abbasi.
"Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters," he wrote. "They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster – one developing leukaemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long Covid since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder."
Cancer accelerator?
 
So 2 years ago, we read and I posted comments
A person with a weakened immune system, over reacts in the membranes of the respiratory system and their blood 02 level drops. They run 'blood gases"

The goal of the clot shot is to hinder the immune system from becoming "over defensive" against the pathogen. So the by product of the clot shot looks like it weakens the immune system against the various cancer cells.

Just a little bonus free education.
We give a patient atropine before surgery. They do not drink fluids before surgery and atropine reduces salivary and respiratory secretions and to prevent aspiration. Under general anesthesia the patient doesn't swallow. This causes a very dry mouth. No saliva enters the lungs. With covid, the over reaction causes fluid and reduces O2 transfer.
 

'This must be aired and debated immediately'​

The well-established link between the COVID-19 mRNA shots and blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is reason enough to stop the vaccine program, argues a London oncologist.

And further, the average age of death from COVID-19 in the United Kingdom is 82, which is higher than the age for all other causes, 81.
But there is another reason enough to halt the shots, wrote Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London, in a letter to the British Medical Journal.

"As a practising oncologist I am seeing people with stable disease rapidly progress after being forced to have a booster, usually so they can travel," he wrote to the BMJ's editor in chief, Dr. Kamran Abbasi.
"Even within my own personal contacts I am seeing B cell-based disease after the boosters," he wrote. "They describe being distinctly unwell a few days to weeks after the booster – one developing leukaemia, two work colleagues Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and an old friend who has felt like he has had Long Covid since receiving his booster and who, after getting severe bone pain, has been diagnosed as having multiple metastases from a rare B cell disorder."
I wonder what else they will discover about these jabs as time goes on.
 
I wonder what else they will discover about these jabs as time goes on.
And they called some crazy for questioning if nano chips were in the shots - anything is possible for those who vote for hair sniffing racists who murder 63 million in the womb.
 
This is from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. One of the top medical institutions specializing in cancer:

Myth: The mRNA vaccines change your DNA and could cause cancer.

Truth: None of the vaccines interact with or alter your DNA in any way, and therefore cannot cause cancer.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is not the same as DNA and cannot be combined with DNA to change your genetic code. Here’s now mRNA vaccines actually work:

The mRNA vaccines use a tiny piece of the coronavirus’ genetic code to teach your immune system how to make a protein that will trigger an immune response if you get infected. The mRNA is fragile and it delivers the instructions to your cells to make antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The mRNA does not enter the nucleus of the cell — the part that contains your DNA.

Therefore, there is no truth to the myth that somehow the mRNA vaccine could inactivate the genes that suppress tumors.


And this from Reuters:

Fact Check-No evidence COVID-19 vaccines have caused increase in cancers, contrary to claims made on social media

Even the observations made by the "top oncologist" are not any kind of controlled study, but are merely his anecdotal observations in his own practice, which are likely to be influenced by his know pre-existing opposition to the covid vaccination program, as can be seen from his numerous protestations to that effect. It looks like confirmation bias has caused this doctor to find reason to vindicate his own early claims about the vaccine.
 
That is a good question. They will release the research in 55 years. Unless we sue
Lawsuits require lawyers, and lawyers cost money, and money is acquired though income which usually is the product of being employed - and that's why you'll never sue.
 
This is from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. One of the top medical institutions specializing in cancer:

Myth: The mRNA vaccines change your DNA and could cause cancer.

Truth: None of the vaccines interact with or alter your DNA in any way, and therefore cannot cause cancer.

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is not the same as DNA and cannot be combined with DNA to change your genetic code. Here’s now mRNA vaccines actually work:

The mRNA vaccines use a tiny piece of the coronavirus’ genetic code to teach your immune system how to make a protein that will trigger an immune response if you get infected. The mRNA is fragile and it delivers the instructions to your cells to make antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The mRNA does not enter the nucleus of the cell — the part that contains your DNA.

Therefore, there is no truth to the myth that somehow the mRNA vaccine could inactivate the genes that suppress tumors.


And this from Reuters:

Fact Check-No evidence COVID-19 vaccines have caused increase in cancers, contrary to claims made on social media

Even the observations made by the "top oncologist" are not any kind of controlled study, but are merely his anecdotal observations in his own practice, which are likely to be influenced by his know pre-existing opposition to the covid vaccination program, as can be seen from his numerous protestations to that effect. It looks
So now we have contradictory data - what should we do?
 

Fact Check-

Contrary to the CDC's claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not "change or interact with your DNA in any way," a new Swedish study finds Pfizer's shot goes into liver cells and converts to DNA.

It's the first time that researchers have shown in vitro – or inside a petri dish – how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, the Epoch Times reported.
However, the researchers at Lund University in Malmö, Sweden, found that the mRNA vaccine enters human liver cells and triggers the cell’s DNA in the nucleus to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA.

The whole process occurred rapidly, within six hours, concluded the study, which was published by the university's Department of Clinical Sciences. -https://www.wnd.com/2022/03/study-pfizer-covid-shot-converts-dna-human-cells/
 

Fact Check-

Big Pharma exec: COVID shots are 'gene therapy' ... not vaccines​

Acknowledges public would have refused method prior to pandemic'​

Many skeptics have contended that the mRNA-based Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots are not "vaccines" but rather a form of gene therapy that poses untold risks by altering a recipient's DNA.

The federal government and health-care experts have denied that claim. But the president of Bayer's Pharmaceuticals Division is on record describing the mRNA shots as "cell and gene therapy" and acknowledging public wariness of the technology.
Bayer executive Stefan Oelrich, LifeSiteNews reported, made the statement at the World Health Summit, which took place in Berlin Oct. 24-26, drawing 6,000 people from 120 countries.

Oelrich said his company is "really taking that leap" to drive innovation "in cell and gene therapies."
"Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy," he said.

"I always like to say: If we had surveyed two years ago in the public – 'would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?' – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate," Oelrich said.
 
This is from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. One of the top medical institutions specializing in cancer:

Myth: the jab is safe

CDC knew COVID vax associated with myocarditis but left off post-vax surveys​

Data released under court order shows 1 in 3 among earliest populations to get vaccinated reported needing medical care, missing school or work, or inability to "perform normal daily activities." CDC still fighting to keep v-safe "free-text field data" secret.
he earliest demographics to get COVID-19 vaccines, such as healthcare workers, reported a surprisingly high rate of serious complications from them, according to data the CDC turned over under court order.

Among the 10 million-plus users of the agency's v-safe active monitoring smartphone app through July — 8.5 million of whom signed up between December 2020 and April 2021, before all adults were eligible for COVID vaccines — nearly 8% said they required medical care after receiving the vaccines.

For patients ages 3 and older needing such care, nearly 3 in 4 couldn't rely on telehealth visits. They required urgent care (48%), emergency room (15%) or hospitalization (10%). For infants, who were authorized to receive the jabs this summer and are enrolled in v-safe through parents or guardians, hospitalizations were much lower (2%) but urgent care much higher (66%).

Another 12% of v-safe users reported they were unable to perform normal daily activities, and 13% said they missed work or school, meaning 1 in 3 had more than mild adverse reactions.
The fact that the agency didn't prompt users to consider adverse events of special interest (AESI) it had already identified in an early v-safe protocol is "one of the best and most compelling pieces of evidence supporting premeditated [wrongful] conduct," Siri wrote in the second of what he told Just the News would be at least a 12-part series of posts on the disclosures.
 
Back
Top