The term "natural association" without further clarification is meaningless. Whoever the other nameless gentleman is is correct, both are, but that suggests to me apposition and both having the same referent.
One week consists of 7 days
that is the God of the Bible, as he described Himself!
God is One in Being, but self defined as 3 in Persons!
did not know "natural association" was a biblical Greek term?
He is certainly not saying with those words that he is a non-human being, for that is what it amounts to for someone to say that they are a “different” human being existentially than all other human beings .
Good is not a math equation.
The irony seems to be lost to you.
You don’t even have that. “7 Days” = “1 week,” “1 day” = “24 hours.” These are convertible propositions. That is not analogous to the Trinity. In other words “Three persons” is not “=“ to “1 God.” The “is” of predication rather than of identity is being invoked in the “ Triune formula.”
He is saying unambiguously that before he became a human being, he existed as a non-human being in heaven. I note you haven't addressed my other points.
If he is no longer the “ I” who existed before he became a human being, he would be lying about claiming to have existed as that I. Those are two different “I”s as per your claim.
Not so. Per the Old Testament, the use of the anthropomorphic "I" by Spirit entities (e.g. I am God) is accepted theology. There is thus nothing in the use of the anthropomorphic "I" that mandates an ultimate human source or referent.
That would be the case with you. We see this used many times in scripture as God is not a unitarian math equation- you know the typical strawman used by uni's.
Adam and Eve are literally two separate beings, notice they “become” “one flesh” ( not “one”) . This is a metaphorical oneness , not a literal one, denoting marriage , and has the copulation act between a man & a woman in view when their flesh is joined or becomes “one.” If this is seriously your analogy of the apparent “oneness” of God , then it is pure polytheism and paganism indeed. Begone.
Clueless as expected. The fact is One is used in many different ways in Scripture as I have proven. You are the one who rejects the biblical facts and truth regarding its usage.
You are not addressing the problem. You said he ceased being the non-human “ I” and became another “I” when he apparently became a human being. So he could not claim to be that other “I”.
“One” always denotes a singular. If a pagan denies polytheism when he worships Adam and Eve as the “one God” because he claims that they are “one flesh,” would you go along with the foolish pagan’s “logic” ? Yet you expect us to go along with your equally foolish Trinitarian nonsense.