johnny guitar
Well-known member
EVASION. You did NOT deal with Acts 5.Christ is the Holy Spirit. 2 Cor 3:17
Yep.
EVASION. You did NOT deal with Acts 5.Christ is the Holy Spirit. 2 Cor 3:17
Yep.
no need to force anything. as u been told, the Lord Jesus is the Holy Spirit. now, let's take a close look at JESUS the Holy Spirit.Still trying to force The Holy Spirit being Christ.
Why don't u look at verses 8 & 9 of the same chapter 5?EVASION. You did NOT deal with Acts 5.
He knew who He was. In that sense. Yes. Prophets spoke as if they were the mouth of God at at times.He communicated as BOTH.
EVASION. You did NOT deal with Acts 5.
Well said. I will take your advice.Warn a divisive person once, and then warn them a second time.
After that, have nothing to do with them. You may be sure that
such people are warped and sinful; they are self-condemned."
Titus 3:10-11
Its your hope that he will change by your "reasoning."
How many fallen angels were reasoned with by God before He finally let them go to be as they wished?
We can become a reenactment of themselves before the angels to watch.
God gave us Titus 3:10-11 so that we do not wear ourselves out.
That we find our peace in knowing God, not in getting those who choose evil to change their ways. That's God's job if its ever going to happen. Look at Paul's conversion as an example.
Warn a divisive person once, and then warn them a second time.
After that, have nothing to do with them."
You are wearing me out watching you not obeying that verse. Just 'walk away.' God does not need our help for something He can not do.
If God could change evil? Satan would now be in heaven worshiping the Lord! Jesus died for our sins. Not for evil.
You already warned him more than two times. Your obligation has been met..
If you could just walk away? He would be left alone to be his own peace.... Which he would not find.
grace and peace .........
I did.Why don't u look at verses 8 & 9 of the same chapter 5?
![]()
Then perhaps the problem here isn't that Jesus, the Father, and the Holy Spirit aren't YHVH.Jesus is YHWH. He is "the first" (Revelation 1:17), not the second person in a Trinitarian Godhead, because the Bible says, "in him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily" (Colossians 2:9). Trinitarians say Jesus is in the Godhead. The Bible says the Godhead is in Him.
All statements are strawmen.Right. According to Trinitarian Catholic Catechism 252...
The Church uses (I) the term "substance" (rendered also at times by "essence" or "nature") to designate the divine being in its unity, (II) the term "person" or "hypostasis" to designate the Father, Son and Holy Spirit in the real distinction among them, and (III) the term "relation" to designate the fact that their distinction lies in the relationship of each to the others.
So when Trinitarians refer to God as ONE, they are supposed to use the pronoun "IT".
So if they are praying to the one "substance", they should pray...
"God loves you and IT has a plan for your life."
Or if they are praying to the three "persons", they should pray...
"God loves you and THEY has a plan for your life."
Well said. I will take your advice.
Along with the heretics.If you start ignoring people you think are heretics, then the forum will die.
Along with the heretics.
Keep in mind....
The Father is Deity
The Son is Deity
The Holy Spirit is Deity.
So? What differentiates all three from the other?
The Father consists solely of Deity.
One nature only.
No second nature in union for the Father.
The Son and Holy Spirit each have two natures.
Natures that are in union with the Father.
What is the second nature of the Son that is in union with God?
The Son has a soul = humanity.
What is the second nature of the Holy Spirit that is in union with God?
The Holy Spirit has a spirit, like an angel is a spirit!
(unlike the Son who is also soul)
Both angels and men are represented in the Trinity.
Both angels and mankind are very.. very.. very special to the Father.
grace and peace +
Then perhaps the problem here isn't that Jesus, the Father, and the Holy Spirit aren't YHVH.
But that you're using terms to make sure that you are in control of who you think they are, instead of letting them be who they actually are.
The thing that I'm seeing here is that you think this is an argument to win, but in this, you appear to have missed that we are to be engaged in a relationship with YHVH, through Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit regenerates us, and works in our lives, he seals, and dwells in us as a deposit and guarantee of our inheritance in Christ.
So.... instead of trying to figure out how to make others believe you are better than they are, engage in learning to follow Jesus as he is.
This is untrue. First, God is beyond your conception. How many "persons" are within God is unknown to you because God is invisible. What can be known is the subject of revelation. God is complex and unitary (united) and we can't limit God.
As to this, it is clear that "the Logos" is a person (divine thought/command/action centre) distinct from "the (power of) God" per Jn 1:1b; as also seen from Revelation., where God and the Lamb are always distinguished.
I did no such thing. If you think you can show me how I did any of this?
Not there. Its probably one of the best known verses to Christians. But, since you swerved off the road.
Try sticking with what you avoided.
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.." John 1:3This!Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.................
We are talking about why Trinitarians teach an "eternally begotten Son". It is not the same as talking about the deity of Jesus, According to Luke 1:35, the reason he is called the "Son" is because of his miraculous conception. Can you please read Luke 1:35 and Galatians 4:4?
They do not claim to understand how He is eternally begotten. They find in the texts tenses that reveal He is eternally existing.
So, by faith they accept it as being so.
Here is one example. One that average translations skim over and over simplify.
Who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. " Philippians 2:6-8
Simple enough?
When someone sticks with the depth of the Greek tenses this is what scholars used to find, and is one reason they claim that He has always been eternally begotten.
Who {Christ}, though He eternally existed in the essence of God,He did not think equalities {plural} with God a gain to be seized{means to violently take} and held.
Its no coincidence that scholars who STUDIED from the original languages (before translations came out)
came up with some of the conclusions they had.
We get stuck too often with shallow translations that leave us shrugging our shoulders when such matters come up.