US Supreme courts Sotomayer allows NY school vaccine mandate

Faithoverbelief

Well-known member

shnarkle

Well-known member
The good of the populace out weighs any individual seems to be the horse to put your money on.
What is this "good"? From the beginning, Big Pharma has openly claimed that the benefit is limited to a "reduction in mild symptoms". For this claim, the FDA rushes an emergency use authorization application through that effectively kills anyone with at least 2 comorbidities.

Evidently, it is a necessary good to get rid of sick people. Who's next? Those whom the government classifies as "non-essential", aka "Useless eaters."
 

Bob1

Well-known member
What is this "good"? From the beginning, Big Pharma has openly claimed that the benefit is limited to a "reduction in mild symptoms". For this claim, the FDA rushes an emergency use authorization application through that effectively kills anyone with at least 2 comorbidities.

Evidently, it is a necessary good to get rid of sick people. Who's next? Those whom the government classifies as "non-essential", aka "Useless eaters."
The vaccines reduce your chances of catching covid, and if you do catch it, it reduces the severity of symptoms. Not too hard to understand. Stop drinking the right-wing koolaid.
 

DeSanto

Well-known member


Looks like the mandates are going to stick.


The good of the populace out weighs any individual seems to be the horse to put your money on.
Next up... #SCOTUSgate

Corruption at the highest levels.

This is gonna get ugly
 

DeSanto

Well-known member
The vaccines reduce your chances of catching covid, and if you do catch it, it reduces the severity of symptoms. Not too hard to understand. Stop drinking the right-wing koolaid.
Basic human rights obliterated over common cold.
 

vibise

Well-known member
Next up... #SCOTUSgate

Corruption at the highest levels.

This is gonna get ugly
I do think changes should be made in SCOTUS, starting with having those justices follow the same rules as other federal judges and other federal employees of financial disclosure, recusal due to conflicts of interest, limits on outside activities, and defined protocols for removal.
 

Yakuda

Well-known member


Looks like the mandates are going to stick.


The good of the populace out weighs any individual seems to be the horse to put your money on.
I wonder when the gestapo started wearing black robes?
 
Last edited:

HouOz

Well-known member
Basic human rights obliterated over common cold.
?
The common cold has never killed 700k people in the US in a span of 21 months.
It matters not if there were other causes of death that were included in the count - the fact is Covid-19 exacerbates pre-existing conditions to the point where it can kill.
Educate yourself.
 

DeSanto

Well-known member
I do think changes should be made in SCOTUS,
I’m sure you do!
starting with having those justices follow the same rules as other federal judges and other federal employees of financial disclosure,
Agreed, unfortunately, when the justice system is corrupt, those rules are not upheld.
recusal due to conflicts of interest,
HA! If that were the case we would have no federal judges...

limits on outside activities, and defined protocols for removal.
And who gets to remove them? The People?
 

DeSanto

Well-known member
?
The common cold has never killed 700k people in the US in a span of 21 months.
Yeah, so what the heck is killing people?
It matters not if there were other causes of death that were included in the count - the fact is Covid-19 exacerbates pre-existing conditions to the point where it can kill.
Educate yourself.
I have.
 

glenlogie

Well-known member
?
The common cold has never killed 700k people in the US in a span of 21 months.
It matters not if there were other causes of death that were included in the count - the fact is Covid-19 exacerbates pre-existing conditions to the point where it can kill.
Educate yourself.
But 34,300K had covid and survived.
 
Top