Was there over 3300 deaths from covid vaccines between Dec 2020 and April 2021?

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Better yet, show us all ANYONE who has been able to actually isolate this so-called Covid 19 virus. So far, no one can affirm that they ever had an isolated virus. Again, given that the PCR test is useless in diagnosing anyone, there are no cases, nor can anyone legitimately conclude that anyone has died from this phantom virus.

Given that overall deaths are DOWN in 2020, there is no pandemic either.

Given that the CDC has now admitted that only 5% of all deaths are "Covid 19 only", that leaves us with somewhere around 30k Covid 19 deaths. Again, this doesn't come close to being a legitimate epidemic.
Follow this. If most of any and all deaths after March 1 2020 are attributed to Covid, heart attacks, car wrecks, thousands which had no lab tests,

why not attribute any and all deaths to people who had been jabbed, to the "vaccine"?

Take the obese, those with severe respiratory illness, cancer Diabetes, cardiac problems, and over 75 and plop them onto an actuarial table Jan 1, 2020.

40-50-70% had less than 50% chance to live another year?
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Computer simulation.

Computer simulation, and misidentification e.g. exomes look EXACTLY the same.
You are drifting into taboo territory. The "institutions" do NOT want to confront what you see.

We busted the global warming mess the same way. They presented simulations models as if they were factual solid data. We busted them before Climate gate "leaks" where the tricks were exposed.

NIH, CDC, WHO don't exactly do the lab work. They hold the purses and funnel money to partner labs which do "research, modeling, etc. and push papers" The ugly problem is peer review where most papers can't be or have not been replicated. They just got "endorsed".

If a partner lab publishes findings which do not validate experimenter's bias, they may not see more funding.
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
Follow this. If most of any and all deaths after March 1 2020 are attributed to Covid, heart attacks, car wrecks, thousands which had no lab tests,

why not attribute any and all deaths to people who had been jabbed, to the "vaccine"?

Take the obese, those with severe respiratory illness, cancer Diabetes, cardiac problems, and over 75 and plop them onto an actuarial table Jan 1, 2020.

40-50-70% had less than 50% chance to live another year?
I suspect that at some point, they will begin to make these attributions. That point is undoubtedly going to be when it is too late to matter. I think that point has already occurred due to their admission that their gene therapies can shed. From what I've read, it only takes about 30 million people to get jabbed before it (the spike protein process in the gene therapy) can spread throughout the whole population.
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
You are drifting into taboo territory. The "institutions" do NOT want to confront what you see.

We busted the global warming mess the same way. They presented simulations models as if they were factual solid data. We busted them before Climate gate "leaks" where the tricks were exposed.

NIH, CDC, WHO don't exactly do the lab work. They hold the purses and funnel money to partner labs which do "research, modeling, etc. and push papers" The ugly problem is peer review where most papers can't be or have not been replicated. They just got "endorsed".

If a partner lab publishes findings which do not validate experimenter's bias, they may not see more funding.
I think it's a moot point in that all the powers that be have to do is present their narrative, implement their plans, and while everyone is up in arms and presenting their opinions, lawsuits, etc., they continue to run their plans until it simply doesn't matter anymore. If push comes to shove, they can simply throw someone under the bus. For example, if they want to release a deadly bioweapon into the general population to get rid of the excessive amount of riff raff continually littering the planet, they release it, and while everyone is going bananas, they just sit back and wait until they're all dying like flies. They can toss the CDC, WHO, NIH, Bill Gates, etc. under the bus to pacify whoever is left, but so what? They got their way, and those who are left are left to pick up the pieces of their lives, probably under the control of the elites who could probably pick them off just for sport.
 

Harry Leggs

Super Member
You are trying to impose a ridiculous standard on routine protocols that have proven effective over and over again. We have had the initial sequence since Jan 2020, and repeated testing in thousands of labs has confirmed that sequence. That you want to dismiss the data as a fabrication is not going anywhere except to RW extremist websites.
How can C-19 be natural when it is not found in animals (humans only) and have not isolated bat population or intermediary. Unlike SARS1 and MERS? Does not spread outdoors.
Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University chemical biology professor, told National Review last month that their efforts helped to create the false impression that there is a scientific consensus against the possibility of a lab-leak origin. “No such consensus existed then. No such consensus exists now,” he said.
-------------------------------------


Looks like lab origins as a conspiracy theory is fake news.
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
How can C-19 be natural when it is not found in animals (humans only) and have not isolated bat population or intermediary. Unlike SARS1 and MERS? Does not spread outdoors.
Richard Ebright, a Rutgers University chemical biology professor, told National Review last month that their efforts helped to create the false impression that there is a scientific consensus against the possibility of a lab-leak origin. “No such consensus existed then. No such consensus exists now,” he said.
-------------------------------------


Looks like lab origins as a conspiracy theory is fake news.
Study the origin of "narratives" Fao Chi Min 2 million dead narrative was traced to england. He pulled it off the web.
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
I think it's a moot point in that all the powers that be have to do is present their narrative, implement their plans, and while everyone is up in arms and presenting their opinions, lawsuits, etc., they continue to run their plans until it simply doesn't matter anymore. If push comes to shove, they can simply throw someone under the bus. For example, if they want to release a deadly bioweapon into the general population to get rid of the excessive amount of riff raff continually littering the planet, they release it, and while everyone is going bananas, they just sit back and wait until they're all dying like flies. They can toss the CDC, WHO, NIH, Bill Gates, etc. under the bus to pacify whoever is left, but so what? They got their way, and those who are left are left to pick up the pieces of their lives, probably under the control of the elites who could probably pick them off just for sport.
How far along in development is the next deadly crisis?
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
How far along in development is the next deadly crisis?
How many of these end of the world scams are they going to foist on us? When I was a kid it was "duck and cover", then we're all going to drown as the ice melts due to climate change, then terrorists are everywhere, now it's going to be a never ending parade of mutant viruses out to get us. smh.
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
How many of these end of the world scams are they going to foist on us? When I was a kid it was "duck and cover", then we're all going to drown as the ice melts due to climate change, then terrorists are everywhere, now it's going to be a never ending parade of mutant viruses out to get us. smh.
This is large

2007 prediction of
4.5 billion could die of Global warming by 2012

Number of deaths when prediction was published? Zero
Number of deaths total by 2020 Zero


 

shnarkle

Well-known member
This is large

2007 prediction of
4.5 billion could die of Global warming by 2012

Number of deaths when prediction was published? Zero
Number of deaths total by 2020 Zero


Crud, I can't remember the site's name, but you might have heard about it. I think it starts with a "D". Regardless, their website has some sort of link to the CIA or the NSA, and they claim that something like 75 or maybe even 90% of the population of the US will be gone within the next 3 or maybe 5 years. Have you heard about this yet?
 

Faithoverbelief

Well-known member
How many of these end of the world scams are they going to foist on us? When I was a kid it was "duck and cover", then we're all going to drown as the ice melts due to climate change, then terrorists are everywhere, now it's going to be a never ending parade of mutant viruses out to get us. smh.
Oh you mean like socialism and communism and liberals will end the world? Oh yes I understand.
 

Authentic Nouveau

Well-known member
Crud, I can't remember the site's name, but you might have heard about it. I think it starts with a "D". Regardless, their website has some sort of link to the CIA or the NSA, and they claim that something like 75 or maybe even 90% of the population of the US will be gone within the next 3 or maybe 5 years. Have you heard about this yet?
Your details don't ring a bell. On the other hand, the fatal threats to the planet are so common that we are desensitized and ignore them.

The researchers fear that 75% of the species we know today could be lost in just two generations’ time. CNN

But if we have a million species, that means we must be losing 10,000 this year? They can't name 5 that were lost.

But they will be lost because of Global warming.!!!!
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
Your details don't ring a bell. On the other hand, the fatal threats to the planet are so common that we are desensitized and ignore them.

The researchers fear that 75% of the species we know today could be lost in just two generations’ time. CNN

But if we have a million species, that means we must be losing 10,000 this year? They can't name 5 that were lost.

But they will be lost because of Global warming.!!!!
Deagel.com, a private non-governmental online source of military capabilities of the nations of the world, has for some time now predicted in its forecast for 2025 a steep and unexplained decline in US population, from 328 million to 99 million. Seven out of ten Americans alive in 2021 would not be alive in 2025, a 70% decline. Or maybe millions just decide to emigrate.

Here's an excerpt:

After COVID we can draw two major conclusions:

The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low intensity one. It was assumed but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt.
The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so-called Great Reset.
The Great Reset; like the climate change, extinction rebellion, planetary crisis, green revolution, shale oil (…) hoaxes promoted by the system; is another attempt to slow down dramatically the consumption of natural resources and therefore extend the lifetime of the current system. It can be effective for a while but finally won’t address the bottom-line problem and will only delay the inevitable. The core ruling elites hope to stay in power which is in effect the only thing that really worries them.

As COVID has proven Western societies embracing multiculturalism and extreme liberalism are unable to deal with any real hardship.

The stark reality of diverse and multicultural Western societies is that a collapse will have a toll of 50 to 80 percent depending on several factors but in general terms the most diverse, multicultural, indebted and wealthy (highest standard of living) will suffer the highest toll.

The only glue that keeps united such aberrant collage from falling apart is overconsumption with heavy doses of bottomless degeneracy disguised as virtue. Nevertheless, the widespread censorship, hate laws and contradictory signals mean that even that glue is not working any more. Not everybody has to die. Migration can also play a positive role in this.

Six years ago the likelihood of a major war was tiny. Since then it has grown steadily and dramatically and today is by far the most likely major event in the 2020s.

Another particularity of the Western system is that its individuals have been brainwashed to the point that the majority accept their moral high ground and technological edge as a given. This has given the rise of the supremacy of the emotional arguments over the rational ones which are ignored or deprecated. That mindset can play a key role in the upcoming catastrophic events.

Over the next decade it will become obvious that the West is falling behind the Russia-China block and the malaise might grow into desperation. Going to war might seem a quick and easy solution to restore the lost hegemony to finally find them into a France 1940 moment.

If there is not a dramatic change of course the world is going to witness the first nuclear war. The Western block collapse may come before, during or after the war. It does not matter. A nuclear war is a game with billions of casualties and the collapse plays in the hundreds of millions.


 
Top