that's what the RCC is pre and post Vat II.The massive decline in Mass attendance is due to the loss of the Catholic Faith in Catholics. The loss of the Catholic Faith in Catholics is due to Vatican II creating a humanistic, naturalistic, man centered dogma-less religion in which it proclaimed that salvation can be found in any religion or even in no religion at all.
When you follow a non-Catholic religion, you become a non-Catholic.
That's your opinion, of which you know nothing about. The Vatican II religion is objectively a different religion than the Catholic religion.that's what the RCC is pre and post Vat II.
mica said:
that's what the RCC is pre and post Vat II.
sure I do. I was catholic pre and post Vat II - and in catholic schools. so much for what is taught in catholic schools - right?That's your opinion, of which you know nothing about. The Vatican II religion is objectively a different religion than the Catholic religion.
I think that of all the changes in the RCC stemming from Vat II that touched most plain and ordinary Roman Catholics was the change in the liturgy. These changes were equated with the replacement of Latin by whatever the local language was and so the squabbling over accuracy and what they believed was eloquence of the new authorized translation of the liturgy was disruptive to many RC's who didn't like adapting to the new words and gestures. But I think the changes were more deep-seated than even that, and that the new rites brought forth an altered understanding of God, the Roman Catholic Church, the priesthood and salvation.Do you know specifically what Vatican II changed and how it contradicted with what was previously taught before Vatican II by the Catholic Church?
The massive decline in Mass attendance is due to the loss of the Catholic Faith in Catholics. The loss of the Catholic Faith in Catholics is due to Vatican II creating a humanistic, naturalistic, man centered dogma-less religion in which it proclaimed that salvation can be found in any religion or even in no religion at all.
When you follow a non-Catholic religion, you become a non-Catholic.
To me being post and pre Vat 11 I did not mind the change to English. It made sense to me, it meant that most people might finally know what they were listening to and saying. I did not have a problem with Latin, as I ensured I knew the meaning.Has the decline in Roman Catholic Mass attendance been because of their liturgy being radically reshaped since 1965? Since that time their Sunday Mass attendance has declined by at least 50%.
Yes, for the average Catholic, who may not be versed in theology, the changes first manifested itself in the Mass.I think that of all the changes in the RCC stemming from Vat II that touched most plain and ordinary Roman Catholics was the change in the liturgy. These changes were equated with the replacement of Latin by whatever the local language was and so the squabbling over accuracy and what they believed was eloquence of the new authorized translation of the liturgy was disruptive to many RC's who didn't like adapting to the new words and gestures. But I think the changes were more deep-seated than even that, and that the new rites brought forth an altered understanding of God, the Roman Catholic Church, the priesthood and salvation.
Well it took a much softer look at sin and who will can be saved.Yes, for the average Catholic, who may not be versed in theology, the changes first manifested itself in the Mass.
Most Catholics, after all, have never read the documents of Vatican II. But they saw that the Mass was now in the vernacular languages. Before Vatican II, a Catholic could go anywhere in the world and go to Mass and feel at home because it was exactly the same Mass in the same language.
The altar had now been replaced with the Novus Ordo supper table.
The priest no longer faced God in the tabernacle, but now was turned to face the people.
The altar rails were no longer used, and in many cased torn down because now you no longer kneeled to receive the Blessed Sacrament on the tongue from only the hands of a priest, but now stood and received in the hand.
Soon there were "Eucharistic ministers" handing out communion. Gladys, who checked your groceries out at the supermarket earlier in the week, was now giving you the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ in you hand.
Eventually sacred music, Gregorian Chant, was replaced with guitars, drums and banjos, and there were "themed" masses: clown mass, balloon mass, cowboy mass, polka mass, etc. The more stupid and profane, the better, seemingly.
This would be bad enough, but the changes run even much more deeply than even the changes in the Mass. Theological changes that actually redefine what the Catholic Church IS.
I know enough to know it was false under Vat I and still false under Vat II. I was raised catholic, went to catholic schools, most of my family was catholic and many still are 'catholic'. Most of my friends were catholic and some are no longer catholic. Most still claim to be catholic but are just lost souls in this world. Most I can't even read their FB pages because of the vile nastiness they post, they support abortion (a good number have had an abortion), homosexuality and same sex marriage (and openly support and promote it). The words they use I wouldn't allow spoken in my home and I don't want to be around it. I usually read your posts / your version of what was and now is. I don't usually reply to them.Do you know specifically what Vatican II changed and how it contradicted with what was previously taught before Vatican II by the Catholic Church?
Yes, for the average Catholic, who may not be versed in theology, the changes first manifested itself in the Mass.
Most Catholics, after all, have never read the documents of Vatican II. But they saw that the Mass was now in the vernacular languages. Before Vatican II, a Catholic could go anywhere in the world and go to Mass and feel at home because it was exactly the same Mass in the same language.
The altar had now been replaced with the Novus Ordo supper table.
The priest no longer faced God in the tabernacle, but now was turned to face the people.
The altar rails were no longer used, and in many cased torn down because now you no longer kneeled to receive the Blessed Sacrament on the tongue from only the hands of a priest, but now stood and received in the hand.
Soon there were "Eucharistic ministers" handing out communion. Gladys, who checked your groceries out at the supermarket earlier in the week, was now giving you the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ in you hand.
Eventually sacred music, Gregorian Chant, was replaced with guitars, drums and banjos, and there were "themed" masses: clown mass, balloon mass, cowboy mass, polka mass, etc. The more stupid and profane, the better, seemingly.
This would be bad enough, but the changes run even much more deeply than even the changes in the Mass. Theological changes that actually redefine what the Catholic Church IS.
catholics knew / know little to nothing of what scripture says / teaches. They only know what they've been taught by the RCC and / or find in the ccc (to their limited understanding of it).Yes, for the average Catholic, who may not be versed in theology, the changes first manifested itself in the Mass.
most have never read a whole chapter in the Bible. Why would the documents of Vat II be more important than scripture? Unless of course if the RCC is your god, what you believe in and follow.Most Catholics, after all, have never read the documents of Vatican II. But they saw that the Mass was now in the vernacular languages. Before Vatican II, a Catholic could go anywhere in the world and go to Mass and feel at home because it was exactly the same Mass in the same language.
there is no need for an altar anyway. There is no more sacrifice. That was done many years ago.The altar had now been replaced with the Novus Ordo supper table.
The priest no longer faced God in the tabernacle, but now was turned to face the people.
The altar rails were no longer used, and in many cased torn down because now you no longer kneeled to receive the Blessed Sacrament on the tongue from only the hands of a priest, but now stood and received in the hand.
It isn't His body, blood etc. That is made up by the RCC. In NT time lay people passed around the bread... you're chained to rituals made up by men.Soon there were "Eucharistic ministers" handing out communion. Gladys, who checked your groceries out at the supermarket earlier in the week, was now giving you the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ in you hand.
Eventually sacred music, Gregorian Chant, was replaced with guitars, drums and banjos, and there were "themed" masses: clown mass, balloon mass, cowboy mass, polka mass, etc. The more stupid and profane, the better, seemingly.
I don't like change much... but boy, the changes that came when I was born again. A catholic can't even begin to imagine it. My rosary, missal, holy cards etc all landed in the trash. and that was minor compared to the change in my heart and my life. It was a life gloriously turned upside down and inside out.This would be bad enough, but the changes run even much more deeply than even the changes in the Mass. Theological changes that actually redefine what the Catholic Church IS.
Luke 17
20 And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
1 Corinthians 3
16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
1 Corinthians 6
19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.
2 Corinthians 6
16 And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people.
17 Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you,
18 And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
What is it you find that feeds your spirituality?eta - I did (once again) watch a few minutes of a catholic Mass (on TV) the other day. It was so mechanical - and boring (just as I remembered it to be). I'd be spiritually starved if that's what I was fed on.
mica said:
eta - I did (once again) watch a few minutes of a catholic Mass (on TV) the other day. It was so mechanical - and boring (just as I remembered it to be). I'd be spiritually starved if that's what I was fed on.
Him, His word, the Holy Spirit and fellowship with other believers.What is it you find that feeds your spirituality?
That is all manifest in the Mass and the parish. It may not be your cup of tea but it is for many people that very thing you state. Alleluia.Him, His word, the Holy Spirit and fellowship with other believers.
Mysterium Fidei said:
The massive decline in Mass attendance is due to the loss of the Catholic Faith in Catholics. The loss of the Catholic Faith in Catholics is due to Vatican II creating a humanistic, naturalistic, man centered dogma-less religion in which it proclaimed that salvation can be found in any religion or even in no religion at all.
When you follow a non-Catholic religion, you become a non-Catholic.
and what happened to OCAC? that's what we were taught. no way to get away from it. That was just another lie. maybe that was tossed out with Vat II.I wish someone telegraphed this newsflash to RCC apologists that keep using the outdated Trent to debate Protestants. They don't believe me when I tell them in what kind of 'church' they joined.