What is a woman? Part II

Harry Leggs

Super Member
Says the guy who thinks there'd be sexual problems with men and women using the same bathroom...
You do not care about women's rights or safe spaces for females including underage. Biological males should not be allowed but they are under Biden mandates including biological males with a history of sex crimes. Let us say a repeat sex offender bio male in a dress who identifies as a female can hang out in the women's bathroom and if anyone objects the management cannot do anything since it would be discrimination under Joe Biden mandates. (Executive Order 13988). They would have no way of knowing the tranny's criminal or health history. (Could have monkeypox since it is spread thru anal sex) Sounds like you could care less. Sex is now interpreted in a manner that ignores sex. Up next. The Earth is flat
 

Furion

Well-known member
On the contray, you cant care about women's rights when you cant recognise a woman.
Saying nwrt is not going to get you anywhere.
Lefties are having a hard time lately. Maybe he is hurt about it, and he was left to defend the crazy on CARM all by hisself.

So much losing, and now their brains start to sputter when someone asks them what a woman is.

As they fancy themselves as potentially birthing males, it must be frightening to think you won't be able to abort your very first pregnancy.
 

Nedsk

Well-known member
Lefties are having a hard time lately. Maybe he is hurt about it, and he was left to defend the crazy on CARM all by hisself.

So much losing, and now their brains start to sputter when someone asks them what a woman is.

As they fancy themselves as potentially birthing males, it must be frightening to think you won't be able to abort your very first pregnancy.
Yeah but they were doing so good for so long. They never thought the day would come when roe would get the unceremonious dumping it so justly deserved. When your whole ideology is nothing but a house of cards you have to know that someday the wind is going to blow but the liberals never believed it would happen.
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
You do not care about women's rights or safe spaces for females including underage. Biological males should not be allowed but they are under Biden mandates including biological males with a history of sex crimes. Let us say a repeat sex offender bio male in a dress who identifies as a female can hang out in the women's bathroom and if anyone objects the management cannot do anything since it would be discrimination under Joe Biden mandates. (Executive Order 13988). They would have no way of knowing the tranny's criminal or health history. (Could have monkeypox since it is spread thru anal sex) Sounds like you could care less. Sex is now interpreted in a manner that ignores sex. Up next. The Earth is flat
Biden's mandates really don't have the force of law due to the fact that the Executive branch isn't tasked with making law. The Executive branch is tasked with enforcement of laws passed by the Legislative branch.

The other problem with this is the fact that sexual predators don't necessarily prefer children of the opposite sex. In other words, you're looking to protect girls from male sexual predators, but don't offer any solution to protect young boys from them. Why the double standard?
 

Harry Leggs

Super Member
Biden's mandates really don't have the force of law
Like hell, they don't.
due to the fact that the Executive branch isn't tasked with making law.
His mandates are reinforced with court cases that take sides for bio males or trannies against females. If some dude in a dress is hanging out in a female bathroom and somebody complains management will say nothing can be done about it because the clown is a gender female or whatever. That has the force of law.
The Executive branch is tasked with enforcement of laws passed by the Legislative branch.
Biden can sign executive orders which are in effect laws. Esp when they are enforced. Suddenly trannie males are a protected class that have access to female bathrooms or locker rooms. Anyone who complains or puts up a fuss, it is construed as discrimination against the trannie.
The other problem
What problem?
with this is the fact that sexual predators don't necessarily prefer children of the opposite sex.
Yeah so? Did i write they do?
In other words, you're looking to protect girls from male sexual predators, but don't offer any solution to protect young boys from them. Why the double standard?
Why would you assume i (or anybody here) do not care about boys? There is no double standard and i have no control over your weird interpretations.
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
Why would you assume i (or anybody here) do not care about boys?
Because you're only addressing trannies in girl's restrooms, duh.
There is no double standard
There most certainly is. How do you prevent men from molesting boys in the men's restroom? You don't seem to even be aware of that as a possibility. If you've figured out how to prevent it from happening in a men's room, please be so kind as to enlighten us all and perhaps we could apply that same technique with your problem with trannies in the women's restroom.

if you haven't got a solution, then you're just ignoring the problem, and we can just as easily ignore your one-sided hypocritical problem as well.
and i have no control over your weird interpretations.
You don't have any control over your own argument either. It's hypocritical and pointless.
 

Harry Leggs

Super Member
Because you're only addressing trannies in girl's restrooms, duh.
The title of this thread is ''what is a woman?'', not protecting boys in the bathroom. duh. Again you are cherry-picking my response and ignoring where you screwed the pooch.
There most certainly is. How do you prevent men from molesting boys in the men's restroom?
How do i? How do you? Why don't you go out and buy a cops uniform with a fake badge and go sit somewhere in a public bathroom under the guise of protecting boys. They are public bathrooms and both predators and children have access and there are no cameras. That means people have to pay attention.
You don't seem to even be aware of that as a possibility.
Seem to? I wrote why would you assume I (or anybody here) do not care about boys and you totally ignored in favor of your bias or whatever?
If you've figured out how to prevent it from happening in a men's room,
Depends on how far we want to go. Cameras, patrol, escorts, security checks? Leaving the safety of home can be risky.
please be so kind as to enlighten us all and perhaps we could apply that same technique with your problem with trannies in the women's restroom.
My problem of trannies in the girl's bathroom? It is not a problem for you? So you don't care about women's rights, safe spaces, or males having access to the women's bathrooms under the force of law? I don't think it is as much of a problem for bio females molesting little boys in the male bathroom. Most molesters are males according to the crime stats be they trannie males or regular-looking dudes who are on the prowl. They are males even if classified as females because of gender identity as a protected class. Suddenly a bio male is classified as a female in the crime stats? A man in a dress is in the women can with an erection and it goes down as female molestation because the perp identifies as a female but is actually a male? And the perp has a right (thanks to Biden mandates) to be there in the women's can? That is what this thread is about.
if you haven't got a solution, then you're just ignoring the problem, and we can just as easily ignore your one-sided hypocritical problem as well.
Start a thread on it. I may jump in. If not anything else to correct your errors. :D
You don't have any control over your own argument either. It's hypocritical and pointless.
Your assessment is both unwelcome and rude. Like i wrote before. I have no control over your reactions or your weird assumptions. If you do not think i care about boys as you accuse then make your case. Any a-hole can come on here and make unwarranted accusations and use weasel words like seem to. The only thing interesting is trying to figure out what logical fallacy you are employing here. It may be an appeal to ignorance.
 
Last edited:

BMS

Well-known member
Because you're only addressing trannies in girl's restrooms, duh.

There most certainly is. How do you prevent men from molesting boys in the men's restroom? You don't seem to even be aware of that as a possibility. If you've figured out how to prevent it from happening in a men's room, please be so kind as to enlighten us all and perhaps we could apply that same technique with your problem with trannies in the women's restroom.

if you haven't got a solution, then you're just ignoring the problem, and we can just as easily ignore your one-sided hypocritical problem as well.

You don't have any control over your own argument either. It's hypocritical and pointless.
Like what are men and boys doing in men's restrooms? The answer is they are both male. What sex are 'transmen' and 'transwomen' because that will determine whether they should be in male or female rooms
 

Nedsk

Well-known member
Like what are men and boys doing in men's restrooms? The answer is they are both male. What sex are 'transmen' and 'transwomen' because that will determine whether they should be in male or female rooms
That one's a real winner.
 

shnarkle

Well-known member
The title of this thread is ''what is a woman?'', not protecting boys in the bathroom. duh.
Glad to see you're admitting your bias. Again, the fact that this has suddenly jumped on your radar now spotlights the fact that your problem isn't with pedophiles as much as it's with tranny pedos.
Again you are cherry-picking my response and ignoring where you screwed the pooch.
I'm not ignoring anything. I'm simply pointing out that you couldn't care less about pedophiles in general, but only tranny pedophiles which is a bit weird to say the least.
How do i? How do you? Why don't you go out and buy a cops uniform with a fake badge and go sit somewhere in a public bathroom under the guise of protecting boys.
Because it's against the law, and I have better things to do with my time.
They are public bathrooms and both predators and children have access and there are no cameras. That means people have to pay attention.
You're starting to sound like you're more familiar with this subject than you originally let on.
Seem to? I wrote why would you assume I (or anybody here) do not care about boys and you totally ignored in favor of your bias or whatever?
Because you're only focusing on tranny pedophiles, that's why.
Depends on how far we want to go. Cameras, patrol, escorts, security checks? Leaving the safety of home can be risky.
Beside the point. it's risky regardless of the sexual orientation of the pedophile. So again, why focus on one particular type of pedophile rather than just pedophiles in general?
My problem of trannies in the girl's bathroom? It is not a problem for you?
It's no more of a problem for me than pedophiles in general. Why the focus on a segment of the population that dwarfs pedophiles in general?
So you don't care about women's rights, safe spaces, or males having access to the women's bathrooms under the force of law?
Why should I when they pale in comparison to the vast majority of pedophiles, rapists, etc.?
I don't think it is as much of a problem for bio females molesting little boys in the male bathroom.
I agree which is why I was referring to males pedophiles molesting little boys in the men's room.
Most molesters are males according to the crime stats be they trannie males or regular-looking dudes
Agreed. See above.
who are on the prowl.
I'm not the one doing the prowling here dude.
They are males even if classified as females because of gender identity as a protected class.
Correct.
Suddenly a bio male is classified as a female in the crime stats? A man in a dress is in the women can with an erection and it goes down as female molestation because the perp identifies as a female but is actually a male? And the perp has a right (thanks to Biden mandates) to be there in the women's can? That is what this thread is about.
No one has forgotten the OP. By your own admission, you're now focusing on how the perpetrator is classified. Ultimately, they end up serving the same amount of time in prison, and undergo the same stringent requirements after they're let out.
Start a thread on it. I may jump in. If not anything else to correct your errors. :D
You're not correcting any errors so far so there's really no point in bothering to start another thread.
Your assessment is both unwelcome and rude.
It's an accurate observation which you have failed to refute.
Like i wrote before. I have no control over your reactions or your weird assumptions.
No one cares that you're impotent to respond effectively to what others post here.
If you do not think i care about boys as you accuse then make your case.
I already did. I pointed out that your focus is on trannies which are a negligible segment of the population to begin with and an even smaller segment of the population of pedophiles. It's a pointless argument, and one that spotlights the real underlying issue which is your own bias against trannies.
Any a-hole can come on here and make unwarranted accusations and use weasel words like seem to.
The issue isn't who is making the argument, but the content of the argument itself which you are not addressing. You're committing the fallacy of the Ad Hominem.
The only thing interesting is trying to figure out what logical fallacy you are employing here.
And you're obviously still grasping at straws.
It may be an appeal to ignorance.
Nope. Try again.
 

Nedsk

Well-known member
Glad to see you're admitting your bias. Again, the fact that this has suddenly jumped on your radar now spotlights the fact that your problem isn't with pedophiles as much as it's with tranny pedos.

I'm not ignoring anything. I'm simply pointing out that you couldn't care less about pedophiles in general, but only tranny pedophiles which is a bit weird to say the least.

Because it's against the law, and I have better things to do with my time.

You're starting to sound like you're more familiar with this subject than you originally let on.

Because you're only focusing on tranny pedophiles, that's why.

Beside the point. it's risky regardless of the sexual orientation of the pedophile. So again, why focus on one particular type of pedophile rather than just pedophiles in general?

It's no more of a problem for me than pedophiles in general. Why the focus on a segment of the population that dwarfs pedophiles in general?

Why should I when they pale in comparison to the vast majority of pedophiles, rapists, etc.?

I agree which is why I was referring to males pedophiles molesting little boys in the men's room.

Agreed. See above.

I'm not the one doing the prowling here dude.

Correct.

No one has forgotten the OP. By your own admission, you're now focusing on how the perpetrator is classified. Ultimately, they end up serving the same amount of time in prison, and undergo the same stringent requirements after they're let out.

You're not correcting any errors so far so there's really no point in bothering to start another thread.

It's an accurate observation which you have failed to refute.

No one cares that you're impotent to respond effectively to what others post here.

I already did. I pointed out that your focus is on trannies which are a negligible segment of the population to begin with and an even smaller segment of the population of pedophiles. It's a pointless argument, and one that spotlights the real underlying issue which is your own bias against trannies.

The issue isn't who is making the argument, but the content of the argument itself which you are not addressing. You're committing the fallacy of the Ad Hominem.

And you're obviously still grasping at straws.

Nope. Try again.
So what is a woman?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMS

Harry Leggs

Super Member
Glad to see you're admitting your bias.
Referencing the voices in your head? Reminding you of the title of the thread ...What is a Woman ....is not admitting bias. It is putting context on the posts. It is about women, females. Not that facts matter to you.
Again, the fact that this has suddenly jumped on your radar now spotlights the fact that your problem isn't with pedophiles as much as it's with tranny pedos.
That is your accusation but you have not proved anything but made a good case for delusional thinking on your part. Is the Op also biased because it is made about women to the exclusion of men and who are you to presume to confess my problems? Do you think you are Dr Phil? Worry about your own problems. That much you should be able to do something about. 5 cent psychology of Peanuts?
I'm not ignoring anything.
You have been ignoring from the beginning. About Biden mandates not really law.
I'm simply pointing out that you couldn't care less about pedophiles in general, but only tranny pedophiles which is a bit weird to say the least.
Well you are wrong. You are accusing based on no positive evidence to support your accusations. Not only that you are ignoring the context of this thread in favor of your little kangaroo court because it does not support your indictments. You have to prove guilt in reality.
The issue isn't who is making the argument, but the content of the argument itself which you are not addressing. You're committing the fallacy of the Ad Hominem.
Now you are whining about personal attacks when your is nothing but a personal attack based on nothing? You dish it out and you get a small portion back and you whine? :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Top