We are not pagans. We do not invoke names as to make sure our spells work.
Why are you still dodging my question? Again, we both agree the name of the Father and the Son are the same in Matthew 28:19. But, the name of God the Father is YHWH per 38 out of 39 books in the OT. I am asking in particular why you think it is better to conclude that the Father's name is Jesus as opposed to thinking that Jesus inherited another name from his Father, the name that God was called 6500 times in the OT. Remember, the OT calls God YHWH more than the NT calls Jesus Jesus.
God Bless
So you agree that the name of the son is not "son"?
Then how exactly do you folks baptize in the name of the "son" without saying his name?
Are you now administering silent baptisms like the COC?
As far as the Father's name being Jesus, Jesus was named by his Father, 'Jesus" via the angel in Matt 1.
The angel did not make up that name, but his Father did.
Everyone called him "Jesus" from Matt to Rev.
Jesus even called himself, "Jesus"....(16
I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star).
Then, Heb 1:4 says Jesus specifically got his name via INHERITANCE.
So, it means to inherit something from someone infers prior ownership by the original owner.
You can reject this, but the end result is you still don't fit in with Peter and the 3000 at Pentecost's church, but the anti Acts 2:38, Baptist church.
I just don't know how you are going to pull it off in the end.