dingoling.
Well-known member
Yes it did.Because NOTHING salvific happened at the Last Supper
Yes it did.Because NOTHING salvific happened at the Last Supper
What does scripture say is the blood of the covenant?
Jesus said, "“Drink from it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins."Scripture says a death is required
I offer a resolution for that verse, you ignore versesJesus said, "“Drink from it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins."
A death is required.I offer a resolution for that verse, you ignore verses
You already agreed that Jesus didn’t die at the last supper.A death is required.
No he didn't.You already agreed that Jesus didn’t die at the last supper.
You didn't answer my question.
Jesus definitely called the contents of the cup his blood of the covenant.
So how can the blood of the covenant be symbolic?
No death= no propitiation, no new covenant in effect, no sin penalty paidNo he didn't.
Have you found anyone that disagrees with what was said?What does scripture say is the blood of the covenant?
The blood of the covenant cannot be symbolic and Jesus called the contents of the cup his blood of the covenant. The Eucharist instituted by Jesus is not symbolic, it is his body and blood.Have found anyone that disagrees with what was said?
Have you found anyone who thinks symbolic speech needs to be labeled?
I understand your dilemma, you’re forced to choose between what your church tells you is true, and what was actually accomplished on the cross. You chose your church over the cross.The blood of the covenant cannot be symbolic and Jesus called the contents of the cup his blood of the covenant. The Eucharist instituted by Jesus is not symbolic, it is his body and blood.
I understand your dilemma, you’re forced to choose between what your church tells you is true, and what was actually accomplished on the cross. You chose your church over the cross.
symbolic, obviously otherwise it would be sin.Jesus said, "“Drink from it, all of you; for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins."
Unlike your self that thinks it happened at the Last Supper and your personal intepretation is actually saying Jesus had His apostles sin thus making Him no longer spotless.I understand your dilemma, you're forced to choose between what your church tells you is true and what is actually accomplished on the cross and made present to us in the Eucharist.
His blood shed on the cross.What does scripture say is the blood of the covenant?
Nope, no where does scripture say that Jesus blood shed on the cross is the blood of the covenant. What scripture does say is the blood of the covenant is the contents of the cup. So since the blood of the covenant cannot be symbolic and that Jesus blood shed on the cross is the blood of the covenant, then we have to conclude that the contents of the cup is the blood Jesus said on the cross.His blood shed on the cross.
Jesus statements disagree with you.No death= no propitiation, no new covenant in effect, no sin penalty paid
Your statements disagree with Jesus and God's word.Jesus statements disagree with you.