I do not care for that term either. I think "immutable" might be more appropriate.I am unaware of any unconditional covenant in the Bible. Can you show me where that is stated?
I do not care for that term either. I think "immutable" might be more appropriate.I am unaware of any unconditional covenant in the Bible. Can you show me where that is stated?
Yes, they had meaning before moses as well. they have meaning in Christ. but the Rabbi's misunderstood somethings due to their sectarian bent.sure, and believers did sacrifices way way way back as well
but not Mosaic law specific sacrifices
or water immersion or cups and bread with the Jewish context
there is Freedom in Christ -
perhaps those of The Church can just make up whatever they want to
lil' cracker pieces and thimble of grape juice, baby sprinkles
neither matters to or bothers me personally really
but those things (water baptism, cups and bread breaking) had meaning in Jewish life
Would you say the Covenant of Redemption is Unconditional?I am unaware of any unconditional covenant in the Bible. Can you show me where that is stated?
everything HAS to have "meaning in Christ" and The Jews just didn't get it!Yes, they had meaning before moses as well. they have meaning in Christ. but the Rabbi's misunderstood somethings due to their sectarian bent.
Probably tradition, but...John's baptism. The groom as well was baptizedAre you talking about Jewish Wedding Tradition or Law?
Would you agree that Baptism relates to Soteriology, because it pictures the Death, Burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ in good Conscience?
Well why all the ask jews stuff?everything HAS to have "meaning in Christ" and The Jews just didn't get it!
just like every verse has to conform to TULIP, because the Bible teaches TULIP
everthing about Israel is really talking about The Church now, because Israel is toast and those in the Land now are not the real Jews
and Everything Jesus said during His life was aimed at and spoken specifically to Christians,
and there is no worth or in trying to understand the Jewish context of anything, right?
a covenant where God says, "I will...blah blah" and the other covenanty only Believes God will make it happen is an unconditional covenant
a covenant with "you do this, I God will do this" and "you don't do this, I God will do this" is conditional
why not ask them on some things?Well why all the ask jews stuff?
Could you explain how the Bread and Wine are a Melchizadek thing, in relationship to Arminianism and Calvinism?Hey joline. Could you explain why Baptism is a Marriage thing, as it relates to Arminianism and Calvinism?
As for tradition, nothing wrong with that It could have been tradition from Abraham, or even Noah's time.Probably tradition, but...John's baptism. The groom as well was baptized
Joh 3:29 He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice: this my joy therefore is fulfilled.
Yes, we are buried with him, and are raised as well.
Romans 7:4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
On somethings yes. But by no means does that mean you will get a correct answer. For marital baptism, I had to look it up in connection with Marriage. For me at the time, It had to do with Mary and her being a betrothed wife. That does not mean her and Joseph were only engaged, though it can also mean that. It is a reference to her status as a wife. She was not just a concubine. So I actually came across this on accident. The wife of covenant.why not ask them on some things?
they gave us The Bible and the Savior, no?
-
Jesus' baptism had more meaning than just a bath?
there is a Jewish wedding tradition, and it might teach The Church something
about it's relationship to Messiah? hmmm
I am not up to speed on Calvinism, or Arminianism, sorry.Could you explain how the Bread and Wine are a Melchizadek thing, in relationship to Arminianism and Calvinism?
pv 26:11So did I, your inquiry was disingenuous.
I already did, your dross.
That's another subject. You're moving the goal posts. It is very difficult for you to admit being wrong, isn't it?
Saved by the Belle!
Well I'm glad you're here. Arminianism and Calvinism, IE Soteriology; are what we like to talk about...I am not up to speed on Calvinism, or Arminianism, sorry.
Well, thank you. How kind of you.Well I'm glad you're here.
Oh, that dizzies my head. I am not brainy enough to grasp that stuff. Sorry to barge in you guy's forum.Arminianism and Calvinism, IE Soteriology; are what we like to talk about...
Arminians and Calvinists agree when it comes to Total Depravity; that would be a good place for you to start. When Calvinists and Arminians differ very little on a subject, it helps people to get up to speed...
"IT", is the righteousness of Christ, that is imputed to the sinner's account while they are still ungodly.Genesis 15
6 And he believed in the Lord; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
Galatians 3
6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.
James 2
23 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
Romans 4
3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
What is the "it" that is counted for righteousness?
Romans 4
9 Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.
My question; What was counted/reckoned to Abraham for righteousness?
I believe "faith" here refers to the "law of faith" in Romans 3:27, which I define as the merits of Christ on Calvary.
Romans 3
27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.
I don't know exactly what the other poster meant but that covenant has conditions, but not for man to meet. Christ fulfilled the conditions.so you didn't bother to read the study on covenants
only God went thru the pieces of animals, not Abraham
in that covenant - it's on God to make those promises to Abraham a reality, not Abraham
The more the merrier...Well, thank you. How kind of you.
Oh, that dizzies my head. I am not brainy enough to grasp that stuff. Sorry to barge in you guy's forum.
It's the same with "Trinity".It’s the same with the covenant of works .