Unsupported. I recognize actual logic. No-one on the planet but you recognizes Terconian logic.
No you don't. And below is a good example of you doing just that.
Again, this is not what actual physicists say.
The problem that you and physicist have is that you cannot show otherwise. The logical truth exposes the atheist folly.
If all QM models require and entail observation and measurement before WFC and entanglement can be known to occur, then that means that the ONLY way and place that physicality can be known to occur is in and with a believing mind.
Explain how you now that "observation and measurement" isn't necessarily entailed in WFC and entanglement to occur.
Again, this doesn't address my point that we can know the rock continues to exist outside of our mind because this is the best explanation for the continuity of our perceptions.
Sure it does, because you can't show or know anything including QM models without a believing mind, belief is necessarily entailed in everything we know to occur. And because the ONLY things you know about rocks are what you believe about them entails a believing mind. And your perceptions tell you nothing about the truth and reality, only a believing mind is capable of that.
Actually if the only way and place "we can know the rock continues to exist" when we are not perceiving it is by believing it exists, and belief requires and entails a believing mind, then how can we "know the rock continues to exist outside of our mind", when belief entails and requires a mind silly? You need to stop pretending you know logic, because your words say otherwise.