Unsupported nonsense that God is truth and reality. Truth is a correspondence relation and reality is MIPUST, so your unbelief in them makes you ignorant of reality.
Nonsense, as if the truth and reality cannot be known to exist anywhere else outside of a believing mind, then reality must exist in a believing mind.
Does the "Truth" and its "correspondence relation and reality" knowable with a believing mind? NO!
So your "MIPUST" is just the product of a YOUR unbelieving mind.
Strawman. I am not claiming that my knowledge doesn't require a mind. Try again: I have a believing mind that believes in a reality (MIPUST) beyond my own mind, just as you have a believing mind that believes in a reality (God's mind) that exists beyond your own mind.
How is YOUR "(MIPUST) beyond" YOUR "own mind", when you just said that YOU "have a believing mind that believes in a reality (MIPUST)". So, how is YOUR "(MIPUST) beyond" YOUR "own mind" or "mind-independent", when YOUR "(MIPUST)" is still dependent on YOUR "believing mind that believes" it for its existence silly?
Do you even think before you write this nonsense?
Yet clearly one of us believes wrongly, so belief alone does not guarantee truth.
Strawman. Actually you just disbelieve the truth and I believe it.
Unsupported that only minds can be known to exist. And I am not claiming that things other than minds can contemplate anything, nor is contemplation a requirement for existence. Again, we both believe in something existing independently of our own minds, so mind-independence in this specific sense cannot be impossible.
Strawman and projection.
You are contradicting yourself here, as if YOU are "claiming that" NO other "things other than minds can contemplate anything" and YOUR "anything" means and includes everything, including "existence" itself and its "contemplation", then YOUR claims contradict one another. As if "contemplation" is "a requirement for" contemplating anything's and everything's "existence", then "existence" itself requires contemplation too. And if it doesn't, then explain how you know it doesn't without using your mind and its capacity to contemplate silly? haha have fun.
At no time have I said that is what you think. Rather, I correctly said that you think reality exists beyond and independently of YOUR mind.
Strawman and you're projecting YOUR atheism (unbelief).
Actually what I have stated is that nothing can be known to exist beyond a believing minds, as everything that exists is only known in and because of a believing mind and it is only believing minds that are knowable and have the capacity to know and share the truth and reality. And outside of a believing mind this isn't possible.
Strawman. Again, I am not claiming that my knowledge doesn't require a mind. Try addressing what I said: You believe in something that exists independently of your own mind, so if you can do that for God then we can do the same for MIPUST.
Strawman, that is not what I believe at all, a matter of fact it is the opposite of that nonsense that I believe.
Actually what I believe is that nothing can be known to exist beyond believing minds, as everything that exists is only known in and because of a believing mind and it is only believing minds that are knowable and have the capacity to know and share the truth and reality. And outside of believing minds this isn't possible. So, to suggest that I "believe in something that exists independently of" or without MY "own mind" is a outright lie.