Daniel.
Member
When I see contradiction of scripture I will as I am moved.
Last edited by a moderator:
When I see contradiction of scripture I will as I am moved.
I offered a possible solution. You ignored it.Then stop posting to pretend you have responses.
You have no response.
That objection was pre-empted in the OP : Jesus is "the same yesterday today and forever", and the OT teaches us about the NT (Scriptures provided in the OP), and we see many dynamics persisting through to the NT, and this is yet another that persists (in that Jesus speaks of names being blotted out of the Book of Life).I offered a possible solution. You ignored it.
Well it has a different name. It certainly may be a different book. It may have to do with life on earth.That objection was pre-empted in the OP : Jesus is "the same yesterday today and forever", and the OT teaches us about the NT (Scriptures provided in the OP), and we see many dynamics persisting through to the NT, and this is yet another that persists (in that Jesus speaks of names being blotted out of the Book of Life).
Can names be blotted out of the Book of Life?
Psalm 69
28Let them be blotted out of the book of the living; let them not be enrolled among the righteous.
So, as I've been saying, only the righteous are going to be enrolled in the Book of Life; those who go on sinning willfully are blotted out of the Book of Life.
LOL Yes, unrighteous people immediately physically die, only righteous people live at all.Well it has a different name. It certainly may be a different book. It may have to do with life on earth.
It also could be simply that the book of life isn’t a list of the righteous, but a list of everyone. And all the non elect get blotted out over time.
I have responded to your OP, Daniel: you have failed to provide exegetical support for your position, as usual.You're right : I have not provided an absence of exegetical support.
"I laugh in the general direction" of your "total absence of [English skills] you have not provided."
So you have no response. Not surprised.
Thanks for failing in front of everyone.
Would you kindly link me to your response?I have responded to your OP, Daniel: you have failed to provide exegetical support for your position, as usual.
you responded to it.Would you kindly link me to your response?
I have responded to your OP, Daniel: you have failed to provide exegetical support for your position, as usual.
You made the claim, now substantiate your claim.Would you kindly link me to your response?
Sorry, I didn't seen any substantive responses to the OP made by you--where others have made substantive responses to the OP, I have interacted with them, and if you show me where you made one I will interact with it.you responded to it.
You responded to my response, Daniel.You made the claim, now substantiate your claim.
Isn't it obvious that you owe me that?
You responded to my response, Daniel.
Daniel, you said I didn't respond to your post, but I did.Sorry, I didn't seen any substantive responses to the OP made by you--where others have made substantive responses to the OP, I have interacted with them, and if you show me where you made one I will interact with it.
Thanks
I don't deny that you typed words and hit the "Post Reply" button... but you didn't interact with the OP as far as I saw. Everyone can see that I interact with people who do that. You haven't.Daniel, you said I didn't respond to your post, but I did.
I did interact your with OP, Daniel. I criticized it.I don't deny that you typed words and hit the "Post Reply" button... but you didn't interact with the OP as far as I saw. Everyone can see that I interact with people who do that. You haven't.
All right, have a good day I guess (?).I did intersct your with OP, Daniel. I criticized it.
You made the claim, now substantiate your claim.
Isn't it obvious that you owe me that?
Just as your OP does.All right, have a good day I guess (?).
You emptily complained that you thought it lacked exegesis.I did interact your with OP, Daniel. I criticized it.