Apostle John disagrees with you!Hi YeshuaFan,
As usual your comments are vacuous and don't engage the content of what you're responding to.
What day is the Lord's day? Here's a hint: It's not Sunday.
Apostle John disagrees with you!Hi YeshuaFan,
As usual your comments are vacuous and don't engage the content of what you're responding to.
What day is the Lord's day? Here's a hint: It's not Sunday.
and where would that beApostle John disagrees with you!
The early churches started to assemble and worship on the Lords day of resurrection Sunday per the Apostles themselves!Icyspark said:
Hi YeshuaFan,
As usual your comments are vacuous and don't engage the content of what you're responding to.
What day is the Lord's day? Here's a hint: It's not Sunday.
---------------- end quote
and where would that be
and don't give me
Rev.1:10
I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day,
and heard behind me a great voice,
as of a trumpet,
Rev is all about
"the Day of the Lord
The day of Battle and War
The sound of the 10 Trumpets in Leviticus
and the great Trumpet
the call to Judgement
Hi CharismaticLady,
You said: "So you believe your fathers will and testament continues even after you inherit and make your own will and testament for your children?"
To which I replied: How long was the Old Covenant in effect? Was there any point during that time that God allowed anyone to add or subtract from what both parties agreed should be observed?
You're attempting to erect a straw man in substitute for what I stated. I asked whether anyone changed the old covenant during the time that it was in effect. The answer is no. Your premise that "your father's will and testament continues even after you inherit" is null and void as it is irrelevant to the issue at hand. No one added or subtracted from the old covenant once it was put into effect.
Thank you for coming around to admitting this. However this acknowledgement reveals a fatal flaw in your premise that you are being Spirit led and that your truth is not His truth. This is further illustrated by your insistence in attempting to marginalize the law and again erecting another straw man. The law was never intended to make anyone holy or righteous. The law points out sin and our need of a Savior. You (and most critics of Adventism) get rid of sin by pretending that the law that identifies sin is no longer in effect thus making the whole world sinless! That is how you attain your version of being sinless. Jesus wasn't sinless because there wasn't a law to define sin. He wasn't sinless because He is God. He actually and factually kept His Father's commandments--perfectly (John 15:10). That is why the Jewish leaders had to look to false witnesses (Matthew 26:20) to accuse Him at His mock trial (see also John 8:46).
If God's Spirit is within you He will enable you to keep the law which reveals whether you truly love Jesus:
John 14:15“If you love me, keep my commands.John 14:21Whoever has my commands and keeps them is the one who loves me. The one who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love them and show myself to them.”John 15:10If you keep my commands, you will remain in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commands and remain in his love.1 John 2:3We know that we have come to know him if we keep his commands.1 John 5:3In fact, this is love for God: to keep his commands. And his commands are not burdensome,Keeping God's commands isn't what saves you. It merely reveals whether your claim to loving God is true. Obedience reveals whether your faith is real. How do you know whether you are truly "in the faith" (2 Corinthians 13:5)? It's certainly not by blindly following some untested spirit guide who misinforms you about the law's purpose.
Proverbs 27:6Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses.
You have addressed me as your friend. I appreciate that and likewise consider you my friend. Please accept any "wounds" you receive from me in the spirit of true friendship.
I pray this helps.
The early churches started to assemble and worship on the Lords day of resurrection Sunday per the Apostles themselves!
Start ofthe new covenant and new era
Respond to me. I can give you a scripture for everything I believe.Text please. Oh wait, what? You don't have one? That's what I thought.
Please reply to my response to you, #58 and thereafter. Why did you stop responding? You really need to read my posts; they have things you don't seem to know; or, maybe, just don't want to consider.
Hi CharismaticLady,
Sorry, but your rationale is based on a major misconception of what a covenant is. You continue to illustrate that you conflate the agreement/covenant with what was agreed upon. Thus you make the perfect, unchanging God of the Bible into an imperfect, changeable humanistic god of your own imagination. There's not much I can say when a person believes so strongly in what the spirit dwelling in them tells them to believe which is shown to be blatant heresy. I'm sure we'll talk more but there's only so much dismissal of what the Bible says on any particular topic before I have to allow the Spirit time to impress upon an individual the truths already presented.
God bless!
What I've said to you is God's Word. You are displaying what scripture says about your concept of the Old Covenant, and AGAINST Christ's New Covenant. The Covenant of the Spirit is understood by those with the Holy Spirit. You don't even believe in the covenant of the Spirit, thus you cling to the ministry of death, the laws engraved on stone.
2 Corinthians 3:
For until this day the same veil remains unlifted in the reading of the Old Testament, because the veil is taken away in Christ. 15 But even to this day, when Moses is read, a veil lies on their heart. 16 Nevertheless when one turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. 17 Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. 18 But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord.
The Ten Commandments is for sinners. Why can't you understand that sinners are the very reason why Jesus came. To take their sin away!
Your nonsense transfers the fault from "the people" over to god. That's not the God I worship. It seems to me "the veil" is still in place for someone else.
Your nonsense transfers the fault from "the people" over to god.
Then you haven't been listening. The "people" was ADAM. It was his willful sin that was at FAULT, NOT GOD, AND ADAM'S SIN damned the earth and all the people. They got so bad that God had to make laws to harness them under threat of death! But God had a plan to redeem man from the SIN that was causing all the evil and the threats. He sent His own Son to die and be resurrected, so we who would believe in Him could also die to our sin nature, and be resurrected to be slaves of righteousness, and right in God's eyes.
If you believe you still have a sin nature, then you ARE following another god.
Hi CharismaticLady,
As I said, I really don't wish to further engage but you keep illustrating serious errors which call for a rebuttal.
I provided a link in the post to which you just replied indicating the fault was with "the people" and if you would've just checked it maybe you would've seen this strange error before posting this. Aside from the obvious fact that the word "people" comprises more than one person (i.e. Adam doesn't qualify as a plurality as you insist), but the context of that quote indicates that the people were at fault because they did not remain faithful to God's covenant. Adam had nothing to do with the covenant which "the people" did not obey.
Hebrews 8:7-13For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 8 But God found fault with the people and said:“The days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares the Lord. This is the covenant I will establish with the people of Israel after that time, declares the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and write them on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest. For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.”By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear.Context, context, context.
This is blatant error as was your earlier contention that "the law was holy." This is easy, milk-of-the-Word stuff.
- Was Adam involved "with that first covenant"?
- Was Adam one of "their ancestors" whom God lead "out of Egypt"?
- Was Adam involved in any way in "not remain[ing] faithful to" God's covenant?
- What covenant was made "obsolete and outdated" and was Adam around to participate in this covenant/agreement?
I am apparently wounding you my in correcting and rebuking your errors and for that I am sorry. But if not me, then who?
Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses.
I pray this helps.
Yes, it was the people, but WHY couldn't they keep the law? That is the big hurdle in your mind you have to get over. If you can't answer that question, you will stay blind and in the dark.
The reason you don't want to engage with me is because I know the MEANING of scripture in the New Testament far better than you ever will while you refuse to even study them.
You bringing this up again - This is blatant error as was your earlier contention that "the law was holy." - shows your hatred of a fellow believer and have committed murder. 1 John 3:15 Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him.
I already explained I used Past Tense because I am no longer under the law for sinners. You will still have to say it IS holy for yourself.
Thank you for admitting your error about Adam vs the people. I find it strange that immediately after acknowledging your own blatant error that you attempt to spin the narrative to the issue being in reality my error and that I'm the one supposedly "blind and in the dark."
Hmm. So the fact that I'm engaging you in reality means I not actually engaging you? That's rather strange, don'tcha think? If you "know the MEANING of scripture in the New Testament far better than ever will" how is it you're making such blatant errors regarding New Testament issues? This contention is very hard to justify in relation to your recent string of errors.
Wow. So now you're resorting to accusing me of "hatred of a fellow believer and hav[ing] committed murder"? I really don't think you understand the New Testament as well as you suppose. You certainly don't understand me or my motives. In fact, in my previous post I indicated that I am your true friend and quoted Proverbs 27:6: "Wounds from a friend can be trusted, but an enemy multiplies kisses." But apparently you think you not only know the New Testament better than me but you know me better than me. The reality, however, is that you don't know me or my motives. I correct and rebuke your errors in keeping with the Paul's New Testament admonition to "correct, rebuke and encourage--with great patience and careful instruction." Proverbs 10:17 says, "Whoever heeds discipline shows the way to life, but whoever ignores correction leads others astray." I correct you so that you do not lead others astray.
What's even more absurd is that by your own standard of what you suppose should be considered "hatred" you are condemning yourself as being hateful. You are attempting to correct what you perceive as being errors on my part, but apparently your corrections are loving and righteous, while my corrections of blatant errors are hateful and wicked? Yeahhhh, logic doesn't work like that and neither does the Holy Spirit.
Speaking of the Holy Spirit, let's consider what Paul says about those who walk according to the Spirit:
Galatians 5:16-26So I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the flesh desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the flesh. They are in conflict with each other, so that you are not to do whatever you want. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law. Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit. Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other.
If you are walking by the Spirit do you think the Spirit is leading you to accuse me of being hateful? Since I am not in any way meaning to be hateful, then I can tell you that the Spirit is not leading you to accuse me of something which is not true. If that's the case does that not mean that you are embracing "the acts of the flesh"? Are you not--using your own expressed standard--being hateful toward me? Are your words not discordant? Are your words showing the fruit of the Spirit? Are your words showing forbearance toward me? Kindness? Gentleness and self-control? If not, then according to Paul you are not being led by the Spirit and you are still under the law.
Paul didn't qualify it the way you are attempting to do so.
Romans 7:7-12What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.” But sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of coveting. For apart from the law, sin was dead. Once I was alive apart from the law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died. I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death. For sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, deceived me, and through the commandment put me to death. So then, the law is holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous and good.
In this passage Paul confirms what is said elsewhere in the New Testament that transgression of the law is what determines sinful behavior. Your attempt to read into this passage something explicitly not there is not allowed for believers who are walking by the Spirit. Paul doesn't say, "The law is holy, righteous and good, but only for those who are no longer under the law." That is your private interpretation. Your dismissal of what the New Testament uses as the definition of sin is apparently what allows you to consider yourself sinless. After all, if there is no definition of sin, then effectively you are sinless. That's not New Testament. That's Your Testament.
until we receive our glorified body (soon) and go Home we are still not entirely free though? that Day being a fulfillment of being saved the way i think you mean that ….. by law I understand sin and death, flesh…. to be at war with His law of life…. Consider that whole purpose of the 10 commandments was and is to protect us until that Day…. seen in that way as a protection for us from the evil realm, then it’s understandable that we still need to listen Him all the time. I think I get what you might mean that as souls if we are in Him and listen Him and left behind this world…(which is still obeying Him!) then we are under His law now which is the law of the spirit of life. There is always a law at work (a law is a reality) such that it is His or it is of sin….I used Past Tense because I am no longer under the law for sinners. You will still have to say it IS holy for yourself.