Eightcrackers
Well-known member
Give the definition of existence.I did. BY DEFINITION!!!
Or should I say, give the one you are using.
"There was nothing, then, something" does not violate the LONC.AND the fact that to claim otherwise leads one to violate the law of non-contradiction.
Nor does "there was something, then, nothing".
I agree.To claim that existence doesn't exist is a contradiction!
But you seem to be conflating the state/property of existence with the things that exist.
Again, agreed.Likewise, to claim that nothing exists is also a blatant contradiction.
But to claim that nothing existed, then something existed, is not.