Biblican
Well-known member
If the image is indwelt, then it is divine. Jesus' Spirit is the Holy Spirit.Identifying is different from being. An image is not divine.
If the image is indwelt, then it is divine. Jesus' Spirit is the Holy Spirit.Identifying is different from being. An image is not divine.
Sounded like it with your comments.I never said God sits on a commode, silly.
Then your divine image sits on a toilet. That's laughable. Just ask Elijah.If the image is indwelt, then it is divine. Jesus' Spirit is the Holy Spirit.
Solomon sitting on YHWH's throne does not make Solomon YHWH.And Solomon sat on YHWHs throne.
I never said Abraham was an idolater, you're just in a fantasy world.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.Sounded like it with your comments.
Why are the terms lord, God, YHWH, used with men?Solomon sitting on YHWH's throne does not make Solomon YHWH.
To address a man as God in Judaism is considered idolatry, also in Islam.
And Moses is God in Exodus 7:1, etc. So what?Abraham addresses a man as God in Genesis 18, and sees Him as God.
Yes, Jesus was a man and He had to poop too, He also had to wear diapers as a baby. He was also underwent a horrific death just to save us, when God should have incinerated all of us. Understanding that God is humble even though He is so great is a principle that is never understood by the proud.Then your divine image sits on a toilet. That's laughable. Just ask Elijah.
You should never use the term poop with the divine. Besides the fact that you had no support for this. It's derogatory.Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Then he wasn't divine. Elijah would laugh at such a god.Yes, Jesus was a man and He had to poop too, He also had to wear diapers as a baby.
That's your opinion.He was also underwent a horrific death just to save us, when God should have incinerated all of us.
You should brush up on it.Understanding that God is humble even though He is so great is a principle that is never understood by the proud.
I suggest that you go and study how those terms are applied in the original language always taking into consideration the context and how it affects the meaning.Why are the terms lord, God, YHWH, used with men?
And Moses is God in Exodus 7:1, etc. So what?
I didn't. The scriptures use the term "ease" in relation to God getting rid of His enemies like excrement. I didn't invent this, it's in the Word. God says He will "ease" Himself of His adversaries and that's what the word means in context with the word usage in Deuteronomy. It's God's choice of terminology not mine. He is showing us a really graphic picture of how He views those who hate Him, He rejects them like poop.You should never use the term poop with the divine. Besides the fact that you had no support for this. It's derogatory.
I know how they are.I suggest that you go and study how those terms are applied in the original language always taking into consideration the context and how it affects the meaning.
The Hebrew shows Moses was God. There is no "a" in there. He was in the authority of God. Use that as a learning point.The text in Exodus 7:1 does not say Moses is God, it says God made Moses as a God to Pharaoh. The Egyptians worshiped many gods and God is saying that He made Moses as one of them so that Pharaoh would see him performing with godlike powers.
Show your proof.I didn't. The scriptures use the term "ease" in relation to God getting rid of His enemies like excrement. I didn't invent this, it's in the Word. God says He will "ease" Himself of His adversaries and that's what the word means in context with the word usage in Deuteronomy. It's God's choice of terminology not mine. He is showing us a really graphic picture of how He views those who hate Him, He rejects them like poop.
You don't really understand what is divine.Then he wasn't divine. Elijah would laugh at such a god.
That's your opinion.
You should brush up on it.
Anyway, I'm done.
The "a" is inserted for context by the translators. It's showing us that Moses is not YHWH only a representative. If you think Moses, a man is YHWH, that would be idolatry according to your folks.I know how they are.
The Hebrew shows Moses was God. There is no "a" in there. He was in the authority of God. Use that as a learning point.
Not man or anything created as Jesus was.You don't really understand what is divine.
You had zero proof of this.Jesus fulfilled Isaiah 53, Daniel 9 and every other prophecy about the Messiah there is except one that is is in the future.
Yep. No need to rehash the same stuff with you.You're done? I'm glad.
So are all other men. Judges are call Ho Theos in Exodus 22:8-9. Same with the house of David, Zechariah 12:11.The "a" is inserted for context. It's showing us that Moses is not YHWH only a representative.
A rep in His place.If you think Moses, a man is YHWH, that would be idolatry according to your folks.
Yep. Fork in it.I thought you were done?Go and get some lunch.
Jesus was begotten, birthed from a pre-existing substance, not created.Not man or anything created as Jesus was.
You had zero proof of this.
Yep. No need to rehash the same stuff with you.
I gave you those scriptures in another post already. Just shows you haven't been paying attention.Show your proof.
Haelohm in Exodus 22 means rulers or judges with god given authority. They are not being addressed as YHWH. It's not saying they are "God."So are all other men. Judges are call Ho Theos in Exodus 22:8-9. Same with the house of David, Zechariah 12:11.
A rep in His place.
Yep. Fork in it.