Yes, he was advocating it.
Yes, we should be separated from Pagans in all ways...through our food and what we ingest through our eyes,, etc.. and we should also be obedient to God in everything.
And I don't see the argument not offending a weaker person vs. disregarding God.
Yep.
There was no "New Covenant" for Abraham. There was only the original covenant.
There is nothing in the Genesis text about the Messiah.
YOU don't have to separate your fabrics because you are not part of the People of Israel. For Jews, this is a commandment. People didn't blend threads back then. Mixing the fabrics means having clothing made out of both.
You can do anything you want with numbers. It means nothing. If the destruction of the temple were punishment for killing Jesus, it would have crumbled the day he died.
Again, this type and shadow nonsense. Puhleeze. You should know by now that we just shake our heads when you go into this blather. The Torah says NOTHING about Yom Kippur being a foreshadowment of anything.
Being that God said sacrifices would have to be in the place of His choosing, earth, and in Jerusalem in the temple, you're wrong Biblicon.
Dear Rachel, you are misunderstanding the context. He was not advocating it. In I Cor.10:27-29, he is talking about eating with unbelievers. We know that God showed Peter that food is not to be a barrier in reaching the Gentiles. So in this case when being presented with Gentile food, a believer is not to ask where it came from for conscience sake verse 27. But if he is told specifically that the food was sacrificed to an idol, he is not to eat it.
The Jews were tested for forty years in the wilderness.
You have just demonstrated again your complete lack of understanding of how God uses foreshadows and typologies.
The once a year tabernacle sacrifice was not Yom kippor. Yom Kippur was adapted from it.
Abraham was operating as Christians operate under the New Covenant. He was being led by the Spirit, as are Christians who have been indwelt by the Holy Spirit.
It's all abut the messiah. You can't see it because you do not belong to the messiah.
People didn't blend threads back then because God told them not to. Wool clothes were made of wool and cotton cotton. They embroidered on both types of clothing.
Nope because God is merciful and He wanted to give His people a chance to accept the Messiah. Jesus prophesied that it would be destroyed because they did not receive Him and His prophecy was accurate.
You are mistaken.
This is no different than when Muslims claim that Abraham was a Muslim.
If they "have received Jesus," then they are Christians and not Muslims. Muslims accept that Muhammad was a prophet, aka that the Quran is from God. The Quran teaches that Jesus didn't even die.
Em, it was your cue to quote the text and point out where in that text the messiah was written. Otherwise you are just making unsupported statements.
The Canaanites didn't blend fabrics because God told them not to? Sir, it simply wasn't done and had nothing to do with God.
I've don't that many times and it all went over your head. If you are not called, you are not called so you that's why you can't see it.
I am not talking about the Canaanites, I am talking about the Jews. They didn't blend fabrics, weave them together because God told them not to.
Muslim means "surrendered to God." Abraham was led by the Spirit Muslims are not.
They call themselves Muslims because they have not disconnected themselves from the culture. They believe what the Bible says about Jesus but they still call themselves Muslims. One man I know of actually came to Jesus by reading the Koran.