I am currently studying the early Rabbinical writings say about the messiah and He is seen as a suffering servant and also a ruler in the Messianic age. Their concept of Him matches what the Christianity teaches about Him. The primary function of the Messiah is to be the atonement offering for the soul. That as to come first before He returns to rule and reign.
There's one you are misreading the text. No where in any of the early Rabbinical writings I have studied so far do any of them suggest that there are two Messiahs.
I don't have a link, I am giving you the reference from the text where I am getting it from.
In the once a year sacrifice all sins are covered. Numbers is talking about the sacrifices that are done during the year.
The holy of Holies represents heaven. Only one special priest was allowed to enter once a year to make atonement for the souls of the people. Symbolically he was entering "heaven" which the Holy of Holies represents. When Jesus was crucified the heavy curtain in the temple that separated the Holy of Holies from the sanctuary was torn in two by an earthquake showing us that Jesus made it possible for all to enter heaven in His name. Forty years after that God permitted the temple to be destroyed showing us that it was no longer necessary to continuously offer animal blood for atonement. The plan of redemption God instigated in Eden and foreshadowed through the Old Testament was fulfilled.
No one who willfully and deliberately continues to sin has seen Jesus or known Him. I John 3:6. The original Greek implies continuous deliberate action.
The once a year sacrifice done by the priest in the Holy of Holies was designed to cease all the sins from all the people.
Psalm 2 is a Messianic Psalm which is about Jesus, the Messiah. There is only one Messiah in scripture and the prophets recognized that He had to come to the second temple before it was destroyed when the Jews had lost their power to pronounce capital judgments. This has all been fulfilled.
Keep reading. The Tanakh shows there are several anointed.
How do you know it's legit?
Where?
Yep, and I haven't seen it reference Messiah.
No, the word just means word, command, not a person. You make up a lot.
Nope. I already gave the sins that aren't. Repeating yourself after you were shown to be wrong doesn't help your case.
Did he sprinkle blood on the earthly temple? No.
Which is a lie because nothing confirms this.
No, the sacrifices continued for 37+ years after his death contradicting your point.
An asham doesn't cut it.
So his blood doesn't help you.
Nope. Which sins were covered? How did blood covered money owed, property lost, etc.?
Why don't you have a good response as to an asham and it not covering all sins?
It was about David, who was anointed.
I showed that's not true.
Jeremiah 31:31-34 doesn't support you.
Just go back to Daniel and find your messiah in the history he records to the judgment from chapters 10 through 11.
You are confusing an asham offering with the once a year offering the priest made for all the people in the holy of holies, that's not the same thing.
The verse is talking about people who were never saved in the first place. Holiness is the fruit of having your sins forgiven by God through Jesus' sacrifice.
God was instigating the New Covenant where Jesus' blood was accepted on the heavenly altar which the Holy of Holies is a foreshadow.
You didn't show me to be wrong, you just showed that you don't know the difference between an asham sacrifice the the once a year sacrifice that the priest did in the Holy of Holies, they are not the same thing.