There's no other way for a Jew to understand what your saying.
The shema has never been a paradox for the Jew, only gentiles. Only the unlearned would translate the way you do as it admits to polytheism.
Clearly...and when you read the Tenach, the Jews are not famous for their flawless understanding all the time.
Only the "unlearned" would see the plural and say, "That is plural..." And only the observant would see Genesis open and watch the Father, the Word and the Spirit create together, three and yet only One. And only John would reword Genesis 1 so clearly as to make the understanding possible even for the youngest child.
Every time I quote directly...and I'm not alone, either.
He said he had visions, and only Moses saw clearly.
...ok...and? He SAW in His vision. I don't remember when Moses was even taken directly to where Isaiah SAW his vision. Your point is specious. I don't think you had a coherent conversation with Isaiah.
I accept what is written and balance all of Tanakh.
Unless it's inconvenient to do so. We've seen that. "The Word is not a person..." is something you have to say. It's still denial. You have no problem personifying dust and making it human...but you cannot see that the Word is What actually performed that act. Without the Word nothing was made that was made. Why is it beyond your understanding that the perfect outward expression of God is a person, one with Him?
The grammar shows exclusively one, and alone. You haven't understood the Hebrew.
I don't know...you could be right...Beyond "gods" how many times does Hebrew make plural singular. Being a linguist, I enjoy the grammar of the languages I delve into. But I'm an expert in French and English only, and conversant in Swedish. I won't boast beyond my own means.
Because the grammar doesn't support it. Nor is God made of parts.
Any description of God is inadequate...however, seeing the tripartite nature of man, and knowing I am a single and whole, it's easier to describe the "Trinity" on these terms. I do not like the word itself. But I acknowledge what I see...and the interaction of body and soul and spirit in the redemption of man is essential to understanding the extreme nature of Jesus' act of love.
Your claim. You cannot see the support...runs throughout both testaments.
Then created and not God. You can't be creator and created.
You have limited God...and He did what was required: The Word we SEE at the beginning was made flesh, and dwelt among us. This was the struggle of the early Christians...to understand the nature of the incarnation. You've just taken up one side of the debate.
History doesn't say that. Your NT does.
The NT, like your tenach, is an accurate historic document. That's why these are so daunting to secular historians. Fighting Truth is a vain battle.
Nope...Triune...Father, Word, spirit.
Nephesh in the blood. You're quibbling.
Not sure what you've proven by this...He passed before him, as the cloud descended, declaring the Word...as all Three made His presence known. Echad.
Blood and body are physical. God isn't. Isaiah 40:18,25;46:5. You didn't study damah.
Not strong either...We're pressed into the temporal, and clothed with it. God transcends it...and as He is, we become.
Do you understand that God's call to Israel as His bride, and His overwhelming protection of Her is everything you're fighting against here? Why are you so averse to God loving Israel as a bride? He's pretty graphic in Micah as to His intent. Do you not see the fulfillment?
Yep.
It's adultery get pregnate with another not your husband.
No...It's adultery to lie with another. It's not to believe God, and receive His word, and to have His word clothed with life.
That's called the obedience of faith. Not adultery.
The best historians say otherwise.
Yep the law is perfect and the truth. It perfects.
The Law is perfect. It perfects. That is truth. The Law exhorts. That is truth. And exhortation is an exhortation. That, too, is truth.
Sorry. No need for a 3rd or 2nd wheel.
Agreed. Jesus was neither second nor third. Just the Word made flesh...a need for all time.
It doesn't say love Gods...
Nope...But it says, "Love elohim"...Hope that helps. What works for you in Hebrew will have to work for you in any other language, until you see this.