Kjvo hold that the Kjv is supreme over even the Hebrew and Greek texts though!
Why no attention to the horrible translation of the NIV and others yet crickets ?
- Thread starter Leatherneck0311
- Start date
GeneZ
Well-known member
They are dumb and deceived. What can I tell you?
Even Psaki will give reason why Joe is doing a good job and some will believe her.
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
I have never heard any that hold to the KJV say or imply that the KJV corrects the originals , which I believe was an outright lie started by modern version only folks to besmirch those that stay with the KJV. Most people believe the KJV to be a far superior English translation, and many like myself do not trust nor accept the corrupted minority texts.
GeneZ
Well-known member
Why is your straw man always the "modern versions?" Modern versions suffer from the same problem.
There are too many moments in translation that would require a teacher to take considerable time to explain a word or phrase's usage to get the student to grasp a feel for how a word was used when the Bible was written. There are passages that many remain oblivious to because translations as written can not convey the exacting meaning and depth....
Translations can often lead to questions that will lead the determined searcher to finding answers by God's grace,
The term "modern version only folks" is the outright lie on display here.
Happy to educate you about the beliefs of some KJVOs
many of the Kjvo hold that the Kjv corrects any mistakes in the Hebrew/Greek texts, and that the only valid salvation came from Kjv being used!
Some also hold that the only translation good for missions based off Kjv being translated into native tongue, not off the Greek and Hebrew texts!
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
If this was the only error in modern translations it would be more than enough reason to throw them out. Scripture says “are saved “as opposed to “being saved”, which of course is RCC doctrine.
BINGO!
Like you, I am a former KJVOist. It wasn't until I read some of the writings of WH for myself -- from their own works -- that I realized just how ridiculous the claims of KJVOs are.
The problem is that they won't read the writings of WH. They blindly trust what Riplinger, Waite, Cloud and others say ABOUT them, and that's enough to speak authoritatively concerning their "heresies."
Hey kiwi, i started reading the writings of WH for myself as a direct result of the website BrianT created, and you now own. Like Rick's book The Unbound Scriptures, your site played a part in leading me out of KJVOism.
God bless!
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
Obviously you have never read the book by Hort’s son about his dad who he said was a cultist.
Beloved Daughter
Super Member
And we have explained this issue to you countless times.
So the concepts of justification and sanctification are foreign to you.
You have no link, so why should we believe you.
Beloved Daughter
Super Member
I have read it, and this is an outright lie. Hort's son said no such thing. If one has to make up deliberate falsehoods about things, his vision is deluded. Now go find that book, copy where Hort's son said he was a cultist, and bring it back here. You can find the book for free at http://westcotthort.com/bookshelf.html
Happy hunting.
If you didn't check your statement, for its veracity, then you would be engaging in gossip.
Do you have a reference for that? (And is it doctrine or dogma?)
BTW, RCs also teach the Trinity. Do you object to that doctrine as well?
--Rich
"Esse quam videri"
David1701
Well-known member
Yes, it was.
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
I am not a Roman Catholic nor do I believe their oral traditions are valid. If you are interested do as I did research it.
Notice he dodged the question.