Just remember....He certainly did. He said it about the relationship between Jesus and Joseph, and he said it to get around the claim of a virgin birth:
23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph
And then he told us of the relationship between Joseph and Heli, and when he did that he did NOT say Enomizeto.
Joseph, the son of Heli,
Ignore what? We discussed the Enomizeto issue in depth.
Anyone can find the five posts where I discussed it here: https://forums.carm.org/search/96418/?q=Enomizeto&c[users]=The+Pixie&o=date
You are WRONG that I decided to ignore it. You are WRONG that Enomizeto refers to the relationship between Joseph and Heli. You are WRONG that Heli was the father of Mary.
And I can grind that axe because I am right, and you are WRONG.
Not really, it is pretty straightforward. Luke used it about the relationship between Jesus and Joseph, to allow for the virgin birth.
You want to pretend that instead it is about the relationship between Heli and Joseph. You know it does not work - that is why you cannot quote the text. You are WRONG.
But you have to keep up the pretence to save your precious pride.
Still grinding it, Steve.
You're doing this so you can send yourself to an eternity of misery and agony and anguish for absolutely no other reason than you are deliberately choosing to.
Demonstrating exactly what Jesus said.
Joh 3:18-21 WEB 18 He who believes in him is not judged. He who doesn’t believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only born Son of God. 19 This is the judgment, that the light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light, for their works were evil. 20 For everyone who does evil hates the light and doesn’t come to the light, lest his works would be exposed. 21 But he who does the truth comes to the light, that his works may be revealed, that they have been done in God.”
Hope you're happy with your choice.