Announcement

Collapse

Message to all users:

https://carm.org/forum-rules

Super Member Subscription
https://carm.org/carm-super-members-banner-ad-signup

As most of you are aware, we had a crash to forums and were down for over two days a while back. We did have to do an upgrade to the vbulletin software to fix the forums and that has created changes, VB no longer provide the hybrid or threaded forums. There are some issues/changes to the forums we are not able to fix or change. Also note the link address change, please let friends and posters know of the changed link to the forums. For now this is the only link available, https://forums.carm.org/vb5/ but if clicking on forum on carm.org homepage it will now send you to this link. (edited to add https: now working.

Again, we are working through some of the posting and viewing issues to learn how to post with the changes, you will have to check and test the different features, icons that have changed. You may also want to go to profile settings,since many of the notifications, information in profile, also to update/edit your avatar by clicking on avatar space, pull down arrow next to login for user settings.

Edit to add "How to read forums, to make it easier."
Pull down arrow next to login name upper right select profile, or user settings when page opens to profile,select link in tab that says Account. Then select/choose options, go down to Conversation Detail Options, Select Display mode Posts, NOT Activity, that selection of Posts will make the pages of discussions go to last post on last page rather than out of order that happens if you choose activity threads. Then be sure to go to bottom and select SAVE Changes in your profile options. You can then follow discussions by going through the pages, to the last page having latest responses. Then click on the other links Privacy, Notifications, to select viewing options,the forums get easier if you open all the tabs or links in your profile, user settings and select options. To join Super Member, pull down arrow next to login name, select User Settings and then click on tab/link at top that says Subscriptions.

Thank you for your patience and God Bless.

Diane S
https://carm.org/forum-rules
See more
See less

The Democratic Desperation on Kavanaugh is Delicious

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Democratic Desperation on Kavanaugh is Delicious

    They really are desperate:

    1. Demanding nomination process be delayed until after midterm elections.
    I don't think so.

    2. Declaring that the Ginsburg Rule must now be abandoned and nominees must in detail give their views on hot button legal issues.
    Nope.

    3. That Kavanaugh is either already disqualified or must recuse himself as a justice if any Supreme Court business becomes related to any investigation, indictment of Trump campaign people or in feverish hopes, the Donald himself.
    Nah.

    4. Whenever the Democrats regain power that court packing must be instituted to "save democracy".
    They may be onto something here...saving democracy sounds urgent, perhaps Trump should get a head start and pack the court from his list. Heh.

    5. Attacking him as a "frat boy" and trying to make a thing out of his name somehow.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-boy-name.html

    6. Melting down over a puffy opinion piece appearing in the Washington Post.

    https://hotair.com/archives/2018/07/...dge-Kavanaugh/

    I liked how Chris Hayes for instance pretty much says the piece shouldn't have been published. Sweet.

  • #2
    Schumer and his snowflake posse oppose everything.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by somnia View Post
      They really are desperate:

      1. Demanding nomination process be delayed until after midterm elections.
      I don't think so.

      2. Declaring that the Ginsburg Rule must now be abandoned and nominees must in detail give their views on hot button legal issues.
      Nope.

      3. That Kavanaugh is either already disqualified or must recuse himself as a justice if any Supreme Court business becomes related to any investigation, indictment of Trump campaign people or in feverish hopes, the Donald himself.
      Nah.

      4. Whenever the Democrats regain power that court packing must be instituted to "save democracy".
      They may be onto something here...saving democracy sounds urgent, perhaps Trump should get a head start and pack the court from his list. Heh.

      5. Attacking him as a "frat boy" and trying to make a thing out of his name somehow.

      http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-boy-name.html

      6. Melting down over a puffy opinion piece appearing in the Washington Post.

      https://hotair.com/archives/2018/07/...dge-Kavanaugh/

      I liked how Chris Hayes for instance pretty much says the piece shouldn't have been published. Sweet.
      I think Trump is saving the US Constitution which the Dems would just as soon be rid of. It blocks them from fully implementing their brand of fascism.

      If he had meant to cast you away he would have done so long ago. If he wanted reasons for rejecting you he had reasons from all eternity, for he knew what you would be. No sin in you has been a surprise to him. C.H. Spurgeon

      Comment


      • #4
        Senator Chuck Grassley, talking about the Democrats dragging out the hearings, said "If you're already going to vote NO, how much more information do you need?"
        "Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the emperor.".....I Peter 2:17

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by awsmmix View Post
          Senator Chuck Grassley, talking about the Democrats dragging out the hearings, said "If you're already going to vote NO, how much more information do you need?"
          That is a great line.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by awsmmix View Post
            Senator Chuck Grassley, talking about the Democrats dragging out the hearings, said "If you're already going to vote NO, how much more information do you need?"
            The Democrats have no real hope of blocking the nomination. All that's left is to get as much political mileage out of it as possible.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Tyrrho View Post

              The Democrats have no real hope of blocking the nomination. All that's left is to get as much political mileage out of it as possible.
              The 30% hard left loud-mouthed radicals do not like the fact that the voices of the rest of Americans are being heard above the din.
              I am not a NPB-Onlyist (No Perfect Bible Onlyist), nor a NA/UBS-Onlyist. Marke

              If this book be not infallible, where shall we find infallibility? We have given up the Pope, for he has blundered often and terribly; but we shall not set up instead of him a horde of little popelings fresh from college. C. H. Spurgeon

              For that Revised Version I have but little care as a general rule, holding it to be by no means an improvement upon our common Authorized Version. C.H. Spurgeon

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by somnia View Post
                They really are desperate:

                1. Demanding nomination process be delayed until after midterm elections.
                I don't think so.

                2. Declaring that the Ginsburg Rule must now be abandoned and nominees must in detail give their views on hot button legal issues.
                Nope.

                3. That Kavanaugh is either already disqualified or must recuse himself as a justice if any Supreme Court business becomes related to any investigation, indictment of Trump campaign people or in feverish hopes, the Donald himself.
                Nah.

                4. Whenever the Democrats regain power that court packing must be instituted to "save democracy".
                They may be onto something here...saving democracy sounds urgent, perhaps Trump should get a head start and pack the court from his list. Heh.

                5. Attacking him as a "frat boy" and trying to make a thing out of his name somehow.

                http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-boy-name.html

                6. Melting down over a puffy opinion piece appearing in the Washington Post.

                https://hotair.com/archives/2018/07/...dge-Kavanaugh/

                I liked how Chris Hayes for instance pretty much says the piece shouldn't have been published. Sweet.
                Do not be surprised if Rosenstein has people spying on him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by somnia View Post
                  They really are desperate:

                  ...5. Attacking him as a "frat boy" and trying to make a thing out of his name somehow.

                  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...-boy-name.html
                  ...
                  That one is really delicious!
                  Fox: "The latest line of attack from liberals against Brett Kavanaugh, President Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, is knocking the judge for his “frat boy”-sounding first name. “We'll be DAMNED if we're going to let five MEN—including some frat boy named Brett—strip us of our hard-won bodily autonomy and reproductive rights,” the influential pro-choice organization NARAL tweeted Tuesday..."
                  Mouser Larry Roy: "yippee ki yay"
                  “... see the loonies in their cages… are they not witty… how much amusement they afford… ours is a human world, theirs is a bestial world… " Bedlam

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by GondwanaLand

                    Yah, Harry Reid sorta screwed the pooch on that one.
                    If the Republicans hadn't used the nuclear option then, they'd be using it now. No real difference.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by somnia View Post
                      ... perhaps Trump should get a head start and pack the court from his list...
                      n>One of the worst, most ridiculous notions I've seen. Now you sound like FDR.

                      .
                      Mouser Larry Roy: "yippee ki yay"
                      “... see the loonies in their cages… are they not witty… how much amusement they afford… ours is a human world, theirs is a bestial world… " Bedlam

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tyrrho View Post

                        If the Republicans hadn't used the nuclear option then, they'd be using it now. No real difference.
                        Hm, but they didn't use it then, and had just as small a majority. They only used it after Harry Reid decided it was a good idea press the big red button.
                        A forum liberal
                        "When you claimed black people were raped, wasn't that racist? I'd say so."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Nouveau View Post
                          Schumer and his snowflake posse oppose everything.
                          But what do you think of the nominee? He is a Catholic who attended a Jesuit high school!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by simplicio View Post

                            But what do you think of the nominee? He is a Catholic who attended a Jesuit high school!
                            As a Catholic I bristle at his Jesuit education, after all the current pope is a Jesuit and look how that's working out? Other than that he seems like just the guy we need to bring common sense back to the court. The judicial activism has to be stopped.
                            "Now, what is the Sacrament of the Altar!
                            Answer: It is the true body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, in and under the bread and wine which we Christians are commanded by the Word of Christ to eat and to drink."

                            Martin Luther "The Large Cathechism"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ignatius View Post

                              As a Catholic I bristle at his Jesuit education,
                              A little too Catholic for you? What would an appropriate education be?

                              after all the current pope is a Jesuit and look how that's working out? Other than that he seems like just the guy we need to bring common sense back to the court. The judicial activism has to be stopped.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X