CrowCross
Well-known member
Hige topic....but in this case clearly for evil purposes and population reduction. Thankfully the lab grown C19 didn't kill as many...initially...as expected.
Gain of Function v. Directed Evolution
- Thread starter DeSanto
- Start date
DeSanto
Well-known member
The Pfizer exec clearly stated his suspicions Covid (the virus) was manufactured via directed evolution.
Manufactured Crisis… meet Cash Cow
We’re talking about creating biological weapons that could wipe out millions of people… not bananas.
I think it is not unreasonable, but it may be more likely that there was an intermediary species.
Viruses can and do jump between species, and there are plenty of examples.
Who did what with what virus?
No evidence that C19 was created in a lab for the purpose of killing people.
Why would it make sense that Chinese scientists would release a dangerous virus in a large Chinese town?
Suspicions are not evidence.
And seriously, if someone wanted to create biological weapons to kill millions, why would they start with a cold virus? How does that make sense?
Makes sense if they did not want any alarms raised.
DeSanto
Well-known member
Didn’t say it was, but it’s pretty obvious. Did you even listen to what the guy said? He literally said there’s no way that virus just came out of nowhere.
And look! YouTube deleted the video. That right there is pretty damning evidence.
Oh, they have much worse in their stockpile. You can be sure of that!
But really all they have to do is make people BELIEVE they going to die… then they can step in as the saviors of humanity and introduce their product.
But they’re going to want to milk that cash cow for everything it’s got.
So, what happens if we catch on to their scheme? Who’s to stop them from creating or using the threat of a killer virus against us or perhaps use it as leverage against politicians and world leaders or just to force people to take their product or die?
Obey
CrowCross
Well-known member
Sheeze vibise....let me ask it a different way....do you still think the virus wasn't created in a lab?
CrowCross
Well-known member
Did you watch the video? Tucker on the 26 of Jan opened with the story and video.
CrowCross
Well-known member
Have you never had a discussion on these forums to talk about population reduction? The inscription of the blown up Georgia Guidestone?
Authentic Nouveau
Well-known member
The old bat conspiracy theory is still activated.
DeSanto
Well-known member
UPDATE:
www.pfizer.com
It should be noted that this carefully worded statement does not deny that Jordon Triston Walker works for Pfizer. Nor does it deny that he is the director of scientific and operational initiatives, which is directly salient to the statements made in the video. It does not directly address the content of the video.
It does not deny the possibility that Pfizer employees may have discussed the intentional mutation of viruses to sell future vaccines. It does not rule out Pfizer subcontractors experimenting to explore such a possibility.
The Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planner says in the video:
Pfizer’s statement did not respond directly to Project Veritas. Nor did it threaten a lawsuit, which could lead to discovery.
Pfizer RESPONDS:
Pfizer Responds to Research Claims | Pfizer
New York, N.Y., January 27, 2023 – Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.
www.pfizer.com
It should be noted that this carefully worded statement does not deny that Jordon Triston Walker works for Pfizer. Nor does it deny that he is the director of scientific and operational initiatives, which is directly salient to the statements made in the video. It does not directly address the content of the video.
It does not deny the possibility that Pfizer employees may have discussed the intentional mutation of viruses to sell future vaccines. It does not rule out Pfizer subcontractors experimenting to explore such a possibility.
The Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planner says in the video:
“One of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
Pfizer’s statement did not respond directly to Project Veritas. Nor did it threaten a lawsuit, which could lead to discovery.
Last edited:
rossum
Well-known member
Covid is not anything near a biological weapon, the death rate is far too small. Anthrax has a death rate about 80%, so if you are looking for a bioweapon, then start with something like Anthrax, or maybe Ebola, not Covid.
It is false to say that covid-19 could not have a natural origin. Viruses are constantly evolving, and in fact can evolve more quickly than cell-based lifeforms because the polymerases they use to replicate their genomes have a high error rate, so a large number of mutant variants are generated that can serve as substrates for natural selection. In fact, after a human is infected with HIV, the infecting virus quickly produces swarms of "quasi-species" with sequence and functional differences - in a single infected person.
What is true is that there are multiple examples of trans-species transmissions of viruses resulting in previously unseen infectious diseases in humans or other animals. In fact, covid-19 is at least the third such jump involving coronaviruses, MERS and SARS being the other two. Other examples include Ebola, HIV, Zika and swine and avian flu. This can and does happen which is why a natural origin for covid-19 is entirely possible if not probable.
The rest of your post is over-the-top conspiracy theory.
Well, there you go. If Tucker said it, why bother checking with scientists!
In order to understand how a virus infects a cell and how it interacts with the host immune system, scientists take it apart to determine what sites are responsible for infectivity and pathogenicity. This commonly involves mutating specific sites in the viral genome to identify the sites critical for function. There is nothing sinister in this, but conspiracy-prone nonscientists wrongly seem to think such mutational analysis must have some evil purpose.UPDATE:
Pfizer RESPONDS:
Pfizer Responds to Research Claims | Pfizer
New York, N.Y., January 27, 2023 – Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight.
It should be noted that this carefully worded statement does not deny that Jordon Triston Walker works for Pfizer. Nor does it deny that he is the director of scientific and operational initiatives, which is directly salient to the statements made in the video. It does not directly address the content of the video.
It does not deny the possibility that Pfizer employees may have discussed the intentional mutation of viruses to sell future vaccines. It does not rule out Pfizer subcontractors experimenting to explore such a possibility.
The Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planner says in the video:
“One of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create — preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine — no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
Pfizer’s statement did not respond directly to Project Veritas. Nor did it threaten a lawsuit, which could lead to discovery.
CrowCross
Well-known member
There was much more to it than that....Walker explained the reason why, the cash cow.
A conspiracy theory.