The reason I mentioned uncertainty is that understanding it in a given poll informs people of what matters most.... In a nutshell, one should be suspicious about a non-scientific poll.
Relevance?
And what makes you think Gallup was "unscientific"?
Why post the poll if it is unscientific?
Why post the poll if it is unscientific and say nothing about it being unscientific?
Supporting a people that openly and desperately asks for help against a monster-sized country that is acting similar to King Ahab and Queen Jezebel did toward Naboth is a worthy endeavor.
That is a woefully inadequate comparison and very poor analogy.
A better analogy might be between Ahab/Jezebel and Babylon. or Babylon, Persia, and Judah because no one is blameless in this conflict and the western democracies hold some culpabilities for going back on their word. A compromise was negotiated where Ukraine would not join NATO, they'd surrender their nukes, and Rusia wouldn't invade. The west continued to make overtures to a corrupt regime to join NATO
knowing it was provocative to Russia. Furthermore, there are elements in the Ukrainian Army that are fascist. Google "
ukrainian soldiers with ss tattoos," and peruse the results. The matter is further complicated because the eastern part of Ukraine still speaks Russian and adheres to Russian cultural histories. It would be comparable to Chinatown covering the entire west coast of the US, or the challenges the UK has experienced with Ireland. Russians (in and out of Ukraine) think Ukraine treats the Russian-Ukrainians the way the Chinese treat the Uyghurs. Then there's the matter of "gold." All wars are fought for gold (money). the more access to the Black Sea Russia has the better.
But ultimately.....
I DON'T CARE!
I don't care about the excuses and justifications and explanations, or merits of supporting Ukraine or anyone else if US tax-payer resources are spent wantonly. Tell me objectives, show me how the objectives are reach, document the expenditures anddemonstrate the resources allocated achieved the stated goals.
That is how all foreign aid should be conducted and that is not happening in Ukraine. Maybe I am wrong, but I suspect there will be greater support for Ukraine if and when concrete goals are articulated, and a sound accounting of tax-payer resources are provided. Until that is done Ukraine will be like every other foreign war in which the US has participated.
Are you aware the money the US has spent in Ukraine rivals the entire yearly military budget of Russia?
Zelensky might be right as Reuters reported a couple of days ago.
Oh, let's do set sound US policy based on what a foreign leader "might" be.
How much support is too much support changes under evolving circumstances.
I will respectfully submit that is a red herring and therefore the wrong question(s) to be asking because no amount will be too much or too little when there are no goals and not accounting.
One thing is for certain: if you do not know where you are going you will definitely not get there. It is axiomatic and it is not an axiom that has anything to do with political parties.