Eightcrackers
Well-known member
Then you judge your god by your standards, and he is not your ultimate standard.Yes, their moral consciences.
You (think you) choose him to be your standard because, by your standard, he is good.
But you arrive at the conclusion that he is good by, in your words, evaluating your god by your moral conscience.No, but we can discover the objective good, and that is what Christians do when they discover God.
Where does that conscience come from? If the answer is "my god", then you are judging him by the standard he gave you. Which is to say, his own standard.
And judging a thing by its own standards is no judgement at all, is it...?
Tu quoque fallacy.I can't prove it, but you can't prove you exist to others.
"Historical evidence" = "a story in a book", in this case.But There is historical evidence that they were revealed by Him in written form to the ancient hebrews.
Is there sociological evidence that Yahweh was the one that "built" them there?And there is sociological evidence that they are built into human consciences.
If so, what is it?
False dichotomy fallacy - I never said we put them there.We can't build things into us since we can't create ourselves.