A self-proclaimed noachide is quite different from one under the umbrella of Israel as stranger or as convert. The courts decide who is a noachide, convert, etc. That's why the issues in Acts 15 were brought before the Nazarene judges jurisdiction.
I agree you've epically failed. The idea of Greek and Roman gods battling and losing to mortals like your idea has is quite comical.
I told you to get familiar with the Jewish idea of emissary, shaliach, agent.
From the Jewish Encyclopedia available online.
I have. Just the context of Moses writing how he and others are God.
See above. You failed.
When they misjudge, but they are referred to as Ho Theos in Exodus 21:6; 22:8-9. So no, you're not consistent.
Then Jacob wrestling with God and God losing must be figurative? Or is your god that weak?
No, you didn't address the Jewish and cultural understanding of what emissaries represent. Refer to the info above.
No argument here.
Not really.
Not when nouns based on context are referring to YHWH. So several humans are referred to as the divine God.
No, the same situation. Why are you wussing on this fact?
I don't reject it. When an emissary speaks the words of God, they are God.
Always.
I don't think that answered my question but okay.
What's the difference? Someone who converts to Judaism becomes a Jew, they are adopted into the People of Israel, and are thus obligated to observe our covenant. Someone who does not convert to Judaism has no such obligation. They are only bound by the Noahide laws.
I agree you've epically failed. The idea of Greek and Roman gods battling and losing to mortals like your idea has is quite comical.
Your god lost in a wrestling match. What a loser.
No...that isn't what I asked. Once again...you didn't read/comprehend.
I'm sure the rest of your responses will follow your silly habits.
Sure he does. The emissary appears before anyone the agent desires with all the power and in His name.
It addresses that an emissary is for all intent purposes the actual agent in the presence of others. I guess you can't handle that you have no clue regarding Judaism nor cultural ideas as the background for Tanakh.
Grow up. You can't address the issues and are acting the wuss.
I've addressed the issue. You just don't like it. Just admit you don't have a solution for consistency with humans being God in God's stead.
Always.
There is nothing wrong with my reading comprehension. You asked why some people, converts, need to keep the 613 laws, while others, non-Jews, need only keep the seven categories. I answered this question.
I'm sure the rest of your responses will follow your silly habits.
I guess you can't address your weak god losing a wrestling match.
Why is your ontological god a weakling?
It addresses that an emissary is for all intent purposes the actual agent in the presence of others. I guess you can't handle that you have no clue regarding Judaism nor cultural ideas as the background for Tanakh.
Your exhaustive search was pathetic, DOGB.
You don't have a response for your stance on a weakling as a god, right? If you think that your god was actually wrestling Jacob, then you have bigger issues in your ideology.
The funny thing is, I know you don't read everything literally, because if you did, there would be no excuse given that Jesus acknowledges he has a God, God isn't flesh and blood, and other verses in the NT that acknowledges no one has seen God.
I don't reject anything. I also accept that Moses wrote that he is God, as well as Abraham, the house of David, angels, judges, etc. So, you must several divinities if you're going to be consistent.
Out of context? Hardly. So, do you accept the divinity of Moses and others?
The only nonsense are your inconsistencies.
He still does.
Yes, there definitely is something wrong with your reading comprehension.
Jeshua made it simple.
No, she is correct.
It's both. There are two categories of gentiles. 1) Ger Toshav - a gentile that follows the 7 noachide laws; and 2) Ger Tzedek - a gentile that has converted and follows the same laws a native Jew does.
You said "one law for the native and stranger." If a Gentile converts, one assumes they're no longer a stranger.
Correct. They are a full-fledged Jews, and can marry other Jews. Converts are considered "born again" and not the same person.
Not everyone fears God to the point of taking on all of the law, like the Sabbath, festivals, circumcision, etc.
It appears that @Jewjitzu and I disagree on this, although I would say the odds are very high that we are just misunderstanding him, and that if he further elaborated it would make more sense.
All rabbis teach this. It is standard Judaism. Jesus was not the originator of the teaching.
No, we agree. See post #433.
Nothing new here. Jesus borrowed from his predecessors.
Sure but in the New Convenant we are no longer under the law which no one could keep anyways. The purpose of the law was for one to recognize that they are sinners and in need of a Savior. Jeshua is that Savior. No one will see Heaven unless you are Born Again and only then will your mind be renewed and understand that Jeshua is that ticket to Heaven..