spot onIt is impossible for Scripture to disagree with God.
It is impossible for God to disagree with Scripture.
If you think otherwise; please explain how God's words can disagree with God's words
spot onIt is impossible for Scripture to disagree with God.
It is impossible for God to disagree with Scripture.
If you think otherwise; please explain how God's words can disagree with God's words
Every word is inspired by THE WORD (JESUS).And all I'm saying if two people are teaching and one of them is Jesus, I'm believing Jesus. I'm the one believing God, God Incarnate himself, Jesus Christ.
Those books were never scripture. The RCC is the proven bad tree, so has no authority over real believers. You have it right are you kidding. Your leaders fail the scriptural requirements for leaders, a fact that RCs ignore.Not so. Protestants took out those books of the Canon.
The Church can also be looked at as "God Breathed" as much as any writings.
We believe we must accept Jesus as the Savior, and scripture also tells us that. We believe scripture as well, our entire worship and faith is based on it.
Yes, it is the highest religious authority on this earth. The CC was instituted by God himself while he was here.
Someone has to interpret the scriptures, and that would be the Holy Catholic Church. We have it right, you all are still flailing. In that action you would be correct.
No, your institution is the bad tree. Jesus never established the bad tree, therefore it is not part of God's word. It is not inspired. It cannot be included. You are deluded when you make that comment.Then let us include the one church he started as well.
It would be lowering scripture, if we accepted the RCC as being the church. It is the bad tree, its fruit speaks.It isn't lowering one's views... it is the assurance that Christ gave us a Church, protected by the Holy Spirit.
Only in your estimation.They should not have been in there: they were not God-breathed
The Canon of Scripture was settled by the Bishops of God's church years ago, so there is no reason to add anything to it. It is the Church itself that was "God Breathed", and thus it has standing and authority.Then why are not the "God Breathed" writings from the Catholic Church in the Canon
No. The minimum is a belief that Mary was indeed the Mother of God.Is belief in the Immaculate Conception of Mary a REQUIREMENT for salvation?
Nice opinion.Nope, Scripture is the highest authority on earth:
As does the Church.Scripture has the same authority as God speaking
In the whole scheme of things yes, but it is the Church that was set up to be a teaching church for the faithful as they go through the journey of life. It has God given authority to decide things here on earth.God is more authoritative than the Church
I believe they would have equal authority. Someone has to interpret the scriptures, hence the Church and the bishops who lead it.Therefore Scripture is more authoritative than any Church
The proper authorities interpret scripture.Interpretation is not the same as authority.
No.Do you think the interpreters of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount have more authority than Jesus's words?
Not really.Every one of your points have been refute.
Very well, I do respect your opinion. Mine is different as you have come to know.And my point stands: Catholics have a lower view of Scripture than the Reformers
Not all of your fruit is good either.It would be lowering scripture, if we accepted the RCC as being the church. It is the bad tree, its fruit speaks.
I always find this strange sort of comment from RCs. As if they believe all fruit is the same. Yet they divide sins into mortal sins and venial sins. Their leaders do mortal sins and they just blindly accept them as having authority. That is not scriptural.Not all of your fruit is good either.
Only in your estimation.
The Canon of Scripture was settled by the Bishops of God's church years ago, so there is no reason to add anything to it. It is the Church itself that was "God Breathed", and thus it has standing and authority.
No. The minimum is a belief that Mary was indeed the Mother of God.
Nice opinion.
As does the Church.
In the whole scheme of things yes, but it is the Church that was set up to be a teaching church for the faithful as they go through the journey of life. It has God given authority to decide things here on earth.
I believe they would have equal authority. Someone has to interpret the scriptures, hence the Church and the bishops who lead it.
The proper authorities interpret scripture.
No.
Not really.
Very well, I do respect your opinion. Mine is different as you have come to know.
The Canon of Scripture was settled by the Bishops of God's church years ago, so there is no reason to add anything to it.
It is the Church itself that was "God Breathed", and thus it has standing and authority.
The proper authorities interpret scripture.
Wrong. This is what the scriptures say: "If you see a fellow believer sinning in a way that does not lead to death, you should pray, and God will give that person life. But there is a sin that leads to death, and I am not saying you should pray for those who commit it. All wicked actions are sin, but not every sin leads to death." (1 John 5: 16-17.)I always find this strange sort of comment from RCs. As if they believe all fruit is the same. Yet they divide sins into mortal sins and venial sins. Their leaders do mortal sins and they just blindly accept them as having authority. That is not scriptural.
You will find that nowhere in scripture....Christ didn't give us a church protected by the Holy Spirit.... He founded His church, which is the body of believers, each and every single person who is born from above is part of His church....WE ARE the church, the body of Christ and members individually (1 Cor 12)....WE, individual believers are indwelt by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit indwells PERSONS, not religious organizations.It isn't lowering one's views... it is the assurance that Christ gave us a Church, protected by the Holy Spirit.
Nope. the Scriptures are God breathed.Only in your estimation.
The Canon of Scripture was settled by the Bishops of God's church years ago, so there is no reason to add anything to it. It is the Church itself that was "God Breathed", and thus it has standing and authority.
Nope....the IC, PV and assumption are DOGMAS. You HAVE TO BELIEVE them.No. The minimum is a belief that Mary was indeed the Mother of God.
Not an opinion.Nice opinion.
WE are the church. We speak His truth.As does the Church.
Nope....The church is commissioned to preach the Gospel. WE are the church given that commission....everyone born from above. The only authority we have is to teach HIS truth contained in HIS word.In the whole scheme of things yes, but it is the Church that was set up to be a teaching church for the faithful as they go through the journey of life. It has God given authority to decide things here on earth.
Not true at all.I believe they would have equal authority.
Yes, WE are to interpret the scriptures....they aren't written in code.Someone has to interpret the scriptures, hence the Church and the bishops who lead it.
Holy Spirit filled believers are the proper authorities. Again, scripture is not penned in code that needs decoding.The proper authorities interpret scripture.
Yes, really.Not really.
A parable is a sort of code isn't it, a way of teaching to get people to think is my opinion.Yes, WE are to interpret the scriptures....they aren't written in code.
Exactly, and there is zero in Scripture about believing Mary is "the mother of God." That foolishness destroys the truth of the Gospel, and shows the false gospel being propagated by the RCC.Nope. the Scriptures are God breathed.
Nope....the IC, PV and assumption are DOGMAS. You HAVE TO BELIEVE them.
Not an opinion.
WE are the church. We speak His truth.
Nope....The church is commissioned to preach the Gospel. WE are the church given that commission....everyone born from above. The only authority we have is to teach HIS truth contained in HIS word.
Not true at all.
Yes, WE are to interpret the scriptures....they aren't written in code.
WE are to study to show ourselves approved, rightly dividing the word of Truth....
Holy Spirit filled believers are the proper authorities. Again, scripture is not penned in code that needs decoding.
Yes, really.
No, parables aren’t written in code.A parable is a sort of code isn't it,
Who was Jesus? Only God come to earth. Immanuel means "God with us". The Creator himself came to earth as Jesus to experience his creation, and him having a mother would be part of that. Thus, it is very easy to see that Mary, the woman who bore the Christchild into this world is indeed a mother, the mother of Immanuel, Jesus Christ, God Himself come to earth. The scriptures say all that I just said, so what is the problem with that? I see none.Exactly, and there is zero in Scripture about believing Mary is "the mother of God."
Mary was the mother of Jesus' humanity. God has no mother! God did not need a mother to come into existence (He has always existed and always will); but, Jesus' humanity did need a mother.Who was Jesus? Only God come to earth. Immanuel means "God with us". The Creator himself came to earth as Jesus to experience his creation, and him having a mother would be part of that. Thus, it is very easy to see that Mary, the woman who bore the Christchild into this world is indeed a mother, the mother of Immanuel, Jesus Christ, God Himself come to earth. The scriptures say all that I just said, so what is the problem with that? I see none.
Yes, he has already been in existence. His journey on earth was something different however, as he remains God when on earth as much as he was God and in heaven. We call women who bring children into the world the word "mother", and Mary was indeed the mother of Immanuel (GOD WITH US).Mary was the mother of Jesus' humanity. God has no mother! God did not need a mother to come into existence (He has always existed and always will); but, Jesus' humanity did need a mother.
...and nothing you've stated proves your errors as to what the RCC truly means and says about "Mary."Who was Jesus? Only God come to earth. Immanuel means "God with us". The Creator himself came to earth as Jesus to experience his creation, and him having a mother would be part of that. Thus, it is very easy to see that Mary, the woman who bore the Christchild into this world is indeed a mother, the mother of Immanuel, Jesus Christ, God Himself come to earth. The scriptures say all that I just said, so what is the problem with that? I see none.
Um...she was mother of His humanity, not His Divinity.Yes, he has already been in existence. His journey on earth was something different however, as he remains God when on earth as much as he was God and in heaven. We call women who bring children into the world the word "mother", and Mary was indeed the mother of Immanuel (GOD WITH US).