Runningman
Well-known member
For us there is only one God, the Father. 1 Corinthians 8:6.And yet the Bible is clear that there is only ONE God
For you there are many gods.
For us there is only one God, the Father. 1 Corinthians 8:6.And yet the Bible is clear that there is only ONE God
Yes, but it was through an act of creation, not procreation.Let me try it this way. Who is the literal father of Jesus Christ? Is it not God the Father?
Again, through an act of creation.Jesus DID NOT HAVE a literal human father. He had a literal human mother and His Father was Deity.
If Jesus was procreated, you might have a point. But he wasn't, he was created. God provided what was necessary for Mary to conceive a man.So, can you give me an example of a son that does not share or have the same nature as it's father?
That's Trin-speak. The Bible NEVER says Jesus Christ has "two natures."Jesus is the one and only person who has two nature's. One on His mother's side, (human), and one on His Fathers side "Deity or God."
Again, who do Jesus Christ and Paul say that one God is?And yet the Bible is clear that there is only ONE God, period. Prove me wrong!
...IN GOD THE SON,
james
You just don't listen. I told you no like 4 times now and I explained my reasons. You on the other hand have not answered one of my questions but instead filled the room with "smoke screen" excuses. Thomas identified Jesus Christ as his "Lord and God." Paul identified Jesus as God. John identified Jesus as God.So....... your way of dealing with your Isaiah 44:24 problem here is to throw your own confusion at it?
You have indeed lost your mind. It is only insanity that would deny that it is the God of Jesus speaking at Isaiah 44:24. His God is the only God there is. But you gleefully lept into that insanity of denying this was his God speaking.
Or are you just too far gone now to even recognize how insane that was?
Can you please give me a list of all the verses you think prove Jesus Christ was a created being?Yes, but it was through an act of creation, not procreation.
Again, through an act of creation.
If Jesus was procreated, you might have a point. But he wasn't, he was created. God provided what was necessary for Mary to conceive a man.
That's Trin-speak. The Bible NEVER says Jesus Christ has "two natures."
Again, who do Jesus Christ and Paul say that one God is?
...
Matt 1:18 Now the birth [genesis, meaning origin, source, or beginning] of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.Can you please give me a list of all the verses you think prove Jesus Christ was a created being?
IN GOD THE SON,
james
Well can you explain why you stopped there? What does the rest of the verse say? Here, let me help you out. "yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and we exist for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him." Since it explicitly says there is "one Lord Jesus Christ" does that mean that God the Father is not the Lord in your mind? Btw, notice the little word "and" in the verse, what is the function of this conjunction word in the verse?For us there is only one God, the Father. 1 Corinthians 8:6.
For you there are many gods.
Is not a verse found in the bible. It is something you made up. Even in the OT, pre-existent angels are recorded as being men."[all] men do not preexist their conception."
How will you account for "God is the head of Christ" 1 Cor 11:3?Well can you explain why you stopped there? What does the rest of the verse say? Here, let me help you out. "yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and we exist for Him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him." Since it explicitly says there is "one Lord Jesus Christ" does that mean that God the Father is not the Lord in your mind? Btw, notice the little word "and" in the verse, what is the function of this conjunction word in the verse?
IN GOD THE SON,
james
There is no record anywhere, Bible or secular writings, where men preexist their conception.Is not a verse found in the bible. It is something you made up.
They appeared AS men, they weren't men.Even in the OT, pre-existent angels are recorded as being men.
People use that verse to support all kinds of things that don't make sense.Moreover, Luke 18:27 “The things which are impossible with men are possible with God.”
My God is the Creator of heaven and earth. There is none mightier. He is the God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ.Seems your God is very small.
No he didn't. He accused Jesus of blasphemy for claiming to be the Christ, the Son OF God.The high priest at the trial of Jesus at Matthew 26 accused Jesus of blasphemy for claiming to be God.
It's written in 4 gospels and the whole of the NT that Christ pre-existed his conception vis-a-vis his spiritual make up. Why else the need for the phrase, "Christ was an Israelite according to the flesh" in Rom 9:5? Why the reference to the pre-existent "spirit of Christ" in 1 Peter?There is no record anywhere, Bible or secular writings, where men preexist their conception.
The bible says they were men.They appeared AS men, they weren't men.
Many miracles "don't make sense." Doesn't mean they didn't happen.People use that verse to support all kinds of things that don't make sense.
Your God would be a deceiver for making out that Christ pre-existed his conception, if in fact he didn't. But he did, for "In the beginning was the Logos," Jn 1:1a.My God is the Creator of heaven and earth. There is none mightier. He is the God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ.
Got any verses?It's written in 4 gospels and the whole of the NT that Christ pre-existed his conception vis-a-vis his spiritual make up.
Jesus Christ is a blood descendant of "the fathers" on his mother's side. His Father is God.Why else the need for the phrase, "Christ was an Israelite according to the flesh" in Rom 9:5?
What verse are you referring to?Why the reference to the pre-existent "spirit of Christ" in 1 Peter?
You follow a Jewish heresy.
No.Are you a Jew?
The Bible calls them men, but they were angels appearing AS men.The bible says they were men.
True enough.Many miracles "don't make sense." Doesn't mean they didn't happen.
God does not "make out" that Christ preexisted his conception.Your God would be a deceiver for making out that Christ pre-existed his conception, if in fact he didn't.
God's logos was not a sentient being. It is His will, plan, or purposes.But he did, for "In the beginning was the Logos," Jn 1:1a.
The phrase "[monogenes] son of God" means "sent son" cf. Luke 20:13. It is recorded that God loved his son, even before he was sent. It would not be possible if Jesus didn't pre-exist.Got any verses?
So he came from God, which mean he pre-existed.Jesus Christ is a blood descendant of "the fathers" on his mother's side. His Father is God.
1 Peter 1:11.What verse are you referring to?
Why espouse Jewish heresies, then?
They were real men. They ate and drank with Abraham.The Bible calls them men, but they were angels appearing AS men.
Your motto "men do not pre-exist their conception" is fallacious, where "men" denotes sinful men, and so you infer Jesus to be a sinner like all other men. If Jesus was created, he would be like every other man, irrespective of whether he was created by parthenogenesis, which is impossible btw, as "men are not created by parthenogenesis."True enough.
God does not "make out" that Christ preexisted his conception.
Again, an addition to the bible that finds no support from within the bible.God's logos was not a sentient being. It is His will, plan, or purposes.
I'm curious shroom? You said, "They appeared AS men, they weren't men." What verse or verses are you referring to?There is no record anywhere, Bible or secular writings, where men preexist their conception.
They appeared AS men, they weren't men.
People use that verse to support all kinds of things that don't make sense.
My God is the Creator of heaven and earth. There is none mightier. He is the God and Father of my Lord Jesus Christ.
You just don't listen. I told you no like 4 times now and I explained my reasons. You on the other hand have not answered one of my questions but instead filled the room with "smoke screen" excuses.
Thomas identified Jesus Christ as his "Lord and God." Paul identified Jesus as God. John identified Jesus as God.
The high priest at the trial of Jesus at Matthew 26 accused Jesus of blasphemy for claiming to be God.
Even Jesus' own Father identified Jesus as God at Hebrews .
Revelation 1: 8 Jesus identifies Himself as God.
Of course, you have typical excuses that all these text do not mean what they say.
And to make matters even worse for you, you quote Isaiah 44:24
that has nothing to do with whether or not Jesus has a God.
It's about creating, and you even got that wrong because Jesus is clearly identified as the creator in multiple verses in the NT. What do you do, ignore the m, just like everything else about Jesus.Y
Do you know what are the four most lethal words are in the Bible? Of course you don't. It's when Jesus said, "I never knew you." I will close with John 5:22-23, "For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son, (WHY) vs23, in order that ALL may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father who sent Him." Notice the Father sent the Son into the world which means Jesus was not created like the rest of us. To be sent you have to have existed already.
IN GOD THE SON,
james
Every Bible I'm familiar with says your throne O God.Right. Why don't you believe him?
Jesus' throne is God. IOW, the power behind Jesus Christ is God.
The Deity of Christ was believed by ALL Christians from Pentecost.According to Jesus Christ and Paul, who is that one God?
Absolutely ZERO. The Trinity, and the deity of Christ, came much later.
...
NO ONE can be made The ONE True Lord. He either is or He isn't.Right.
Jesus Christ. God MADE him Lord and Christ (Acts 2:36).
No.
Eph 4:5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism,
Great verse!
Jesus isn't the "one true God." His Father is.
I know the one true God (Yahweh, the Father) and I know the Son of God whom God made both Lord and Christ.
John 14:23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.
Yes I do.
1 John 1:3 That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, AND with his Son Jesus Christ.
...still not a biblical phrase, James.
Through Begettal. The SON of God can NEVER be created.Yes, but it was through an act of creation, not procreation.
Again, through an act of creation.
If Jesus was procreated, you might have a point. But he wasn't, he was created. God provided what was necessary for Mary to conceive a man.
That's Trin-speak. The Bible NEVER says Jesus Christ has "two natures."
Again, who do Jesus Christ and Paul say that one God is?
...
It means unique or only. God sent His Son. It does not mean Jesus preexisted.The phrase "[monogenes] son of God" means "sent son" cf. Luke 20:13.
That was prophetic.It is recorded that God loved his son, even before he was sent. It would not be possible if Jesus didn't pre-exist.
No, it does not mean Jesus preexisted.So he came from God, which mean he pre-existed.
No Jew believed Jesus Christ preexisted his conception.1 Peter 1:11.
It was a heretical Jewish sect who first refused to accept Christ's pre-existence: Ebionites.
Why espouse Jewish heresies, then?
No, they were angels appearing as men.They were real men.
They did.They ate and drank with Abraham.
It's not "my motto." It's the truth. Human beings do not preexist their conception.Your motto "men do not pre-exist their conception" is fallacious,
It denotes all men. Jesus Christ was, and still is, a man, a human being. He has been resurrected, glorified, and highly exalted by God.where "men" denotes sinful men,
No, I do not infer that at all. Jesus Christ was born sinless, and kept himself from sinning.and so you infer Jesus to be a sinner like all other men.
He was.If Jesus was created,
God provided what was necessary for Mary to conceive. It was a miracle, an act of creation.he would be like every other man, irrespective of whether he was created by parthenogenesis, which is impossible btw, as "men are not created by parthenogenesis."
That's simply false.Every argument you raise against Jesus's pre-existence is self-defeating and without any foundation.
Look up the word logos and see how it's used.Again, an addition to the bible that finds no support from within the bible.