Search results

One KJV-only poster appealed to 2 Corinthians 6:14 in his effort to support non-scriptural KJV-only opinions. Does he apply this verse soundly, consistently, and justly? Would a consistent, just application of his use of this verse condemn his own KJV-only teaching that involves use of...

Ruth Magnusson Davis maintained that "a characteristic shared by and unique to the Reformation Bibles is the translation of ecclesia by 'congregation'" (The Story of the Matthew Bible, Part 1, p. 243). Ruth Magnusson Davis asserted: "The simple fact is that the Matthew Bible is the only English...

Peter Ruckman asserted that “given by inspiration of God” “is the definition of ‘scripture’ in the ‘scripture’” (King James Onlyism, p. 29), but he did not prove his claim to be true. Perhaps Steven Avery has adopted this definition by Peter Ruckman. Perhaps it has never occurred to some...

Alfred Martin as edited by David Otis Fuller wrote: “The traditional text is not synonymous with the Received Text, but the latter does embody it in a rather corrupt form” (Which Bible, fifth edition, p. 148). Alfred Martin asserted: “One cannot say that the Textus Receptus, for example, is...