Questions that disprove billions of yrs and evolution and prove that the Bible is true and God created all things in 6 days, 6000 years ago.

One person cannot have two different lineages.

Remember that illogic makes one look foolish.
One is through Mary and other through Joseph.
An unsaved person hates the word of God beucase it proves they are wrong.
Therefore they never search the scripture at all.

Saul called David his son. He was just a son in law. So David has a father and a father in law.
And David is the son of Jesse and the son-in-law of Saul.
It also can apply to adopted children.
And then there is the case that if a brother dies and leaves no heir, the eldest brother can marry the widow so that the dead brother has an heir.

The word of God has 2 purposes - to put people in heaven and put people in hell.
 
So, tell us which lineage has the word "Mary" in it? I couldn't see that word in either lineage when I looked.

Does your copy of the Bible have some extra words that other copies don't?
In Luke 3 do you see the phrase (as was supposed).
That is a clue that it is not Joseph. Heli is the father in law of Jospeh, aka Mary’s father.
 
In Luke 3 do you see the phrase (as was supposed).
That is a clue that it is not Joseph. Heli is the father in law of Jospeh, aka Mary’s father.
So, you are interpreting those words as "Mary".

That is a human interpretation of the Bible, so it can be wrong. There are a lot of wrong human interpretations of the Bible out there; just look at the number of different Christian denominations there are.

So, unless your name is Francis, and you are posting from Rome, we don't have to believe you.

P.S. Hope you get better soon.
 
So, you are interpreting those words as "Mary".

That is a human interpretation of the Bible, so it can be wrong. There are a lot of wrong human interpretations of the Bible out there; just look at the number of different Christian denominations there are.

So, unless your name is Francis, and you are posting from Rome, we don't have to believe you.

P.S. Hope you get better soon.
No,
Just that from scripture a persons can have 2 men that count as fathers
Biological and father in law.
Biological and adopted father.
Biological and that biological father’s dead brother if brother died before leaving an heir.
 
No,
Just that from scripture a persons can have 2 men that count as fathers
Biological and father in law.
Biological and adopted father.
Biological and that biological father’s dead brother if brother died before leaving an heir.
All based on YOUR interpretation of the (translated hearsay) words "as was supposed". When were you made Pope?
 
All based on YOUR interpretation of the (translated hearsay) words "as was supposed". When were you made Pope?
Not me.
I just proved that there is no contradiction.
And technically there are 3 possibilities to show you have no proof.
But I believe Matthew is through Jospeh and Luke through Mark, Heli being the father in law of Joseph.
 
Just that from scripture a persons can have 2 men that count as fathers
Two different men, one of whom is called "Joseph" and the other who is called "Joseph". Really? Who is the second Joseph you are talking about?

Your human interpretation of the text is looking weak. A text which does not say "Mary" but only has Joseph. You are going to need something better than this.
 
Two different men, one of whom is called "Joseph" and the other who is called "Joseph". Really? Who is the second Joseph you are talking about?

Your human interpretation of the text is looking weak. A text which does not say "Mary" but only has Joseph. You are going to need something better than this.
No. Heli is Josep’s father in law, aka Mary’s father.
 
Two different men, one of whom is called "Joseph" and the other who is called "Joseph". Really? Who is the second Joseph you are talking about?

Your human interpretation of the text is looking weak. A text which does not say "Mary" but only has Joseph. You are going to need something better than this.
Mammals with different chromosome numbers cannot produce fertile offspring,
So all mammals should have the same chromosome count.

That destroys macroevolution and refutes the dating of the rock layers.

 
Diploid numbers (2n) were found to vary from 2n = 6–7 in the Indian muntjac[7] to over 100 in some rodents.[8]

Genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals

When your mommy opens up your internet access to include Wkipedia instead of just onservapedia, you might have a chance of not looking like a fool with every post.
The indian muntjac has 6 chromosomes in the female and 7 in the male.


This destroys creationism and 6000 years and the Bible.
 
Diploid numbers (2n) were found to vary from 2n = 6–7 in the Indian muntjac[7] to over 100 in some rodents.[8]

Genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals

When your mommy opens up your internet access to include Wkipedia instead of just onservapedia, you might have a chance of not looking like a fool with every post.
The indian muntjac has 6 chromosomes in the female and 7 in the male.


This destroys creationism and 6000 years and the Bible.

This link works.
 
Diploid numbers (2n) were found to vary from 2n = 6–7 in the Indian muntjac[7] to over 100 in some rodents.[8]

Genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals

When your mommy opens up your internet access to include Wkipedia instead of just onservapedia, you might have a chance of not looking like a fool with every post.
The indian muntjac has 6 chromosomes in the female and 7 in the male.


This destroys creationism and 6000 years and the Bible.
Also, this blog:
 
Back
Top